Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:02:15.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Open paediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: a five-year experience at a tertiary referral centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2022

A ElSobki
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
N El-Kholy*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Dr N El-Kholy, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Mansoura University Faculty of Medicine, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura 35516, Egypt E-mail: nohaaelkholy@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Laryngotracheal reconstruction with costal cartilage graft is a cornerstone procedure in treatment of multiple paediatric airway pathologies. The current study aimed to report on the experience of laryngotracheal reconstruction and document post-operative outcomes and complications.

Method

Records of laryngotracheal reconstruction procedures performed between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary indication, clinical data, decannulation rate, voice assessment, need for revision surgery and possible complications were analysed.

Results

A total of 41 patients were treated with laryngotracheal reconstruction. Subglottic stenosis formed the largest percentage of cases followed by congenital glottic web (20 and 14 patients, respectively). Three patients (7.3 per cent) underwent single stage surgery, and the remaining cases had a double stage procedure. Revision laryngotracheal reconstruction was needed in a single case, and 38 out of 39 tracheostomised patients were successfully decannulated.

Conclusion

Favourable outcomes were reported with costal cartilage laryngotracheal reconstruction as a definitive treatment for a large range of paediatric airway problems.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Demonstration of the main steps of anterior and posterior laryngotracheal reconstruction by costal cartilage grafting. (a) Skeletonisation of the rib graft with the overlying perichondrium. (b) Cartilage graft length, which usually measures 4–6 cm. Note the absence of perichondrial coverage as the perichondrium on the pleural side is left in place to guard against pleural injury. (c) The luminal side of the graft with its perichondrium and carved edges to fit into the laryngofissure. (d) Posterior cricoid split. (e) Posterior cartilage graft in place between the edges of the split cricoid lamina. (f) The posterior graft is stabilised in its position by four 4–0 Vicryl sutures. (g) Stent (Foley's catheter) in place with closure of the upper end of the laryngofissure. (h) Anterior cartilage graft. The overlying Prolene suture knots are those used for stent fixation. (i) Endoscopic view immediately after stent removal. (j) Endoscopic view two weeks after stent removal showing completely taken graft.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Different types of stents used in the present study. (a) Part of silicon catheter. The transfixing suture was usually added at the upper end of the stent to give a nearly triangular anterior end to fit in the anterior commissure and also to avoid aspiration. (b) Part of Foley's catheter. (c) Vertical part of T-tube. (d) Frontal and (e) lateral views of the custom-made silicon stent.

Figure 2

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics in the studied group*

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Complications encountered post-laryngotracheal reconstruction. (a) Suprastomal granuloma. (b) Subglottic central granuloma. (c) Bilateral arytenoid prolapse after posterior glottis expansion. (d) Endoscopic view of prolapsed anterior wall graft causing marked narrowing of the airway.

Figure 4

Table 2. Post-operative complications and outcome measures

Figure 5

Table 3. Classification and subjective and objective assessment of severity of glottic web cases*

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Endoscopic-assisted glottic web cutting. (a) Endoscopic view of grade IV glottic web. (b) View after cutting the glottis web demonstrated in (a) without endoscopic visualisation, showing traumatised right vocal fold resulting from unequal cut at anterior commissure. (c) Follow-up view of (a) showing atrophic anterior end of the right vocal fold. (d) Endoscopic view of grade III glottic web. (e) Endoscopic-assisted cutting of web shown in (d) (neck view). (f) Follow-up endoscopic view of (d) showing sharp anterior commissure with taken subglottic anterior graft.