Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:34:03.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The so-called “one-and-a-half” ventricular repair: where are we after 40 years?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2023

Ujjwal Kumar Chowdhury*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Jaipur, RJ, India
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Genetics, Newcastle University, London, UK
Niraj Nirmal Pandey
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Radiology and Endovascular Interventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, DL, India
Sundeep Mishra
Affiliation:
Cardiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Jaipur, RJ, India
Lakshmi Kumari Sankhyan
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Bilaspur, CG, India
Niwin George
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, KL, India
Maroof A. Khan
Affiliation:
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, DL, India
Shikha Goja
Affiliation:
Department of CTVS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, DL, India
*
Corresponding author: U. K. Chowdhury; Email: ujjwalchowdhury@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

The indications, timing, and results of the so-called “one-and-a-half ventricle repair”, as a surgical alternative to the creation of the Fontan circulation, or high-risk biventricular repair, currently remain nebulous. We aimed to clarify these issues.

Methods:

We reviewed a total of 201 investigations, assessing selection of candidates, the need for atrial septal fenestration, the fate of an unligated azygos vein and free pulmonary regurgitation, the concerns regarding reverse pulsatile flow in the superior caval vein, the growth potential and function of the subpulmonary ventricle, and the role of the superior cavopulmonary connections as an interstage procedure prior to biventricular repair, or as a salvage procedure. We also assessed subsequent eligibility for conversion to biventricular repair and long-term functional results.

Results:

Reported operative mortalities ranged from 3% to 20%, depending on the era of surgical repair with 7% risk of complications due to a pulsatile superior caval vein, up to one-third incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias, and a small risk of anastomotic takedown of the superior cavopulmonary connection. Actuarial survival was between 80% and 90% at 10 years, with two-thirds of patients in good shape after 20 years. We found no reported instances of plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, or hepatic cirrhosis.

Conclusions:

The so-called “one-and-a-half ventricular repair”, which is better described as production of one-and-a-half circulations can be performed as a definitive palliative procedure with an acceptable risk similar to that of conversion to the Fontan circulation. The operation reduces the surgical risk for biventricular repair and reverses the Fontan paradox.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Volume rendered images (a–c), oblique coronal images (d and e), and oblique axial image (f) show a small right ventricle (RV) in the setting of transposition. Note is made of pulmonary valvar (PV) stenosis and a subaortic ventricular septal defect (*). [A = aorta; LV = left ventricle; P = pulmonary trunk; LA = left atrium].

Figure 1

Figure 2. The volume-rendered image (a), and the oblique axial image (b) show a hypoplastic tricuspid valve (curved arrow) and a hypoplastic right ventricle (RV). [A = aorta; LV = left ventricle; P = pulmonary trunk; RA = right atrium].

Figure 2

Figure 3. Volume rendered images (a and b) and oblique axial image (c) shows features of tetralogy of Fallot with hypoplasia of the morphologically right ventricle (RV). Note the patent cavopulmonary shunt. [A = aorta; LV = left ventricle; P = pulmonary trunk; * = subaortic ventricular septal defect; arrowhead = infundibular stenosis].

Figure 3

Figure 4. The axial image (a), the coronal minimum intensity projection image (b), and the oblique axial image (c) show the features of right isomerism, in patient with absence of the spleen, a transverse midline liver, bilateral morphologically right bronchuses, and a right-sided heart with atrioventricular septal defect (star).

Figure 4

Figure 5. The volume-rendered images (a and b), the oblique axial image (c), and the oblique coronal image (d) show apical displacement of septal leaflet (yellow arrow) and posterior leaflet (black arrow) of the tricuspid valve in a patient with Ebstein’s malformation. Note the grossly dilated right atrium (RA). [RV = right ventricle].

Figure 5

Figure 6. The volume rendered images (a, c) and the oblique axial image (b) show absence of communication (dotted yellow arrow) between the right atrium (RA) and the incomplete right ventricle (RV), with fat noted within the right atrioventricular groove. This is classical tricuspid atresia. Note the ventricular septal defect (*) and the hypoplastic and incomplete morphologically right ventricle (RV). The volume rendered image (d, with aorta digitally subtracted) shows the superior cavopulmonary connection, connecting the superior caval vein (SCV) to the right pulmonary artery (RPA). [A = aorta; P = pulmonary trunk; LA = left atrium; LPA = left pulmonary artery].

Supplementary material: File

Chowdhury et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Chowdhury et al. supplementary material(File)
File 39.8 KB