Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T04:53:43.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equitable access to evidence-based treatment for eating disorders for patients with low-income: identifying barriers and exploring solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2024

Suzanne Bailey-Straebler Open the ORCID record for Suzanne Bailey-Straebler [Opens in a new window] ,
Deborah R. Glasofer ,
Jessica Ojeda  and
Evelyn Attia
Suzanne Bailey-Straebler*
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
Deborah R. Glasofer
Affiliation:
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
Jessica Ojeda
Affiliation:
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
Evelyn Attia
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
*
Corresponding author: Suzanne Bailey-Straebler; Email: sus9111@nyp.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract

Eating disorders are equally prevalent across socioeconomic status, and yet individuals facing socioeconomic adversity are far less likely to receive evidence-based treatments. A range of barriers contribute to this disparity, including limited awareness and provider training about eating disorders leading to underdiagnosis; a shortage of available services and long waitlists due to a lack of trained therapists, associated treatment costs (e.g. transportation expenses and costly treatment materials) and an insufficient understanding of the impact of an individual’s cultural context. While these barriers are experienced by many individuals with eating disorders, those with low income are particularly vulnerable. To ensure equitable access to effective eating disorder treatment, therapists should actively consider and address the barriers faced by these patients. In this paper, we share guidance based on our experience treating a socioeconomically diverse patient population, on factors to consider when extending the reach of recommended psychological treatments for eating disorders and suggest areas of future research. We emphasize the opportunities available to therapists to improve equity in eating disorders treatment by making accommodations that enhance access to existing evidence-based approaches rather than by making modifications to the treatments.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To identify obstacles experienced by individuals with eating disorders and low income in accessing and engaging in treatment.

  2. (2) To learn practical strategies to reduce or eliminate barriers preventing the uptake of evidence-based psychological eating disorder interventions for individuals with low income.

  3. (3) To appreciate the intersectionality of low income with other factors impacting equity of eating disorder treatment access.

Keywords

DisseminationEating disordersEquityLow incomeTreatment accessTreatment barriers

Information

Type
Empirically Grounded Clinical Guidance Paper
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 17 , 2024 , e5
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Introduction

Eating disorders (EDs) are complex psychiatric illnesses affecting up to 4% of the population, with serious implications for morbidity and mortality (Arcelus et al., Reference Arcelus, Mitchell, Wales and Nielsen2011; Iwajomo et al., Reference Iwajomo, Bondy, de Oliveira, Colton, Trottier and Kurdyak2021). They are associated with numerous medical complications and elevated levels of psychological distress and reduced quality of life (van Hoeken and Hoek, Reference van Hoeken and Hoek2020). Individuals with EDs are at heightened risk for early death, and age at assessment of the disorder has been found to be a predictor of mortality in those with restrictive EDs (Fichter and Quadflieg, Reference Fichter and Quadflieg2016). In addition to grave costs to individuals, EDs are extremely financially costly. In the United States (US), for example, a recent cost-of-illness study estimated the annual health care cost of EDs at $64.7 billion, roughly $11,800 per affected individual (Streatfeild et al., Reference Streatfeild, Hickson, Austin, Hutcheson, Kandel, Lampert, Myers, Richmond, Samnaliev, Velasquez, Weissman and Pezzullo2021). Furthermore, EDs have a remarkably high global burden of disease, and in recent decades, the burden estimates have increased within low- and middle-income countries (Erskine et al., Reference Erskine, Whiteford and Pike2016).

Fortunately, EDs are treatable. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) identifies several recommended psychological treatments for EDs (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2017). However, few patients with EDs have access to these treatments (Cooper and Bailey-Straebler, Reference Cooper and Bailey-Straebler2015). One group especially at risk for inequitable ED treatment access is patients with low income (Accurso et al., Reference Accurso, Buckelew and Snowden2021; Moreno et al., Reference Moreno, Buckelew, Accurso and Raymond-Flesch2023).

Despite EDs being equally prevalent across socio-economic categories (Huryk et al., Reference Huryk, Drury and Loeb2021), patients and families with low income are susceptible to encountering multiple barriers in accessing evidence-based care. In part, this is likely due to the intersection of low-income and other vulnerability factors. For example, low income is associated with having lower education levels, being from a historically marginalized racial/ethnic group, identifying as a sexual or gender minority, having limited English proficiency, and endorsing acculturative distress related to immigration status. All these factors are associated with worse mental health outcomes (Cervantes et al., Reference Cervantes, Gattamorta and Berger-Cardoso2019; Kivimäki et al., Reference Kivimäki, Batty, Pentti, Shipley, Sipilä, Nyberg, Suominen, Oksanen, Stenholm, Virtanen, Marmot, Singh-Manoux, Brunner, Lindbohm, Ferrie and Vahtera2020; Ridley et al., Reference Ridley, Rao, Schilbach and Patel2020). Patients with low income are known to be at increased risk for mental health disorders (Ridley et al., Reference Ridley, Rao, Schilbach and Patel2020; Sareen et al., Reference Sareen, Afifi, McMillan and Asmundson2011), yet are less likely to seek treatment (Sonneville and Lipson, Reference Sonneville and Lipson2018), and more likely to be misdiagnosed (Cachelin et al., Reference Cachelin, Rebeck, Veisel and Striegel-Moore2001; Pulsifer et al., Reference Pulsifer, Evans, Capel, Lyons-Hunter and Grieco2019).

The combination of these factors often delays or prevents treatment access, thereby intensifying the negative health and psychological impact of EDs on this population. For example, data suggest that individuals with EDs categorized as low income have exacerbated symptoms. In Australia, for example, below-median annual household income has been associated with increased prevalence rates of binge eating, purging, and strict dieting (Mitchison et al., Reference Mitchison, Hay, Slewa-Younan and Mond2014). In the US, higher rates of body dissatisfaction and unhealthy weight control behaviours have been reported by adolescents and emerging adults with lower socioeconomic status (Larson et al., Reference Larson, Loth, Eisenberg, Hazzard and Neumark-Sztainer2021).

Guidance on improving the equity of access to evidence-based care for patients with EDs and low income is lacking for real-world therapists; it is therefore crucial to explore and develop solutions (Harvey and Gumport, Reference Harvey and Gumport2015; Kazdin, Reference Kazdin2017; Kazdin et al., Reference Kazdin, Fitzsimmons-Craft and Wilfley2017). Our out-patient ED specialty clinic (S.B.-S., E.A.) is part of an academic hospital located in a major metropolitan city on the East Coast of the US. Here we provide a case for equitable access to ED treatment through accommodations and examples based on clinical experience (S.B.-S., E.A.). We discuss how to apply this framework to reduce barriers and enhance fidelity to standards of evidence-based care.

Equitable treatment access via accommodations

Due to a lack of diversity and representation in clinical research (Burnette et al., Reference Burnette, Luzier, Weisenmuller and Boutté2022; Hartman-Munick et al., Reference Hartman-Munick, Silverstein, Guss, Lopez, Calzo and Gordon2021; Smolak and Striegel-Moore, Reference Smolak, Striegel-Moore, Striegel-Moore and Smolak2001), very little is known about how current treatments perform in patients with low income. Although some of the major randomized control trials providing the evidence for recommended ED treatment report including patients of different income levels, income is neither routinely analysed in relation to outcome nor clearly detailed (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fursland, Allen and Watson2011; Fairburn et al., Reference Fairburn, Cooper, Doll, O’Connor, Bohn, Hawker, Wales and Palmer2009; Fairburn et al., Reference Fairburn, Bailey-Straebler, Basden, Doll, Jones, Murphy, O’Connor and Cooper2015; Wonderlich et al., Reference Wonderlich, Peterson, Crosby, Smith, Klein, Mitchell and Crow2014). For example, ‘occupational social class’ is reported in some studies (e.g. Fairburn et al., Reference Fairburn, Cooper, Doll, O’Connor, Bohn, Hawker, Wales and Palmer2009), but this may or may not be aligned with income. Other reports include an income category cut-off (>$100,000) which is well above a low-income threshold (Le Grange et al., Reference Le Grange, Lock, Agras, Bryson and Jo2015).

Research assessing the efficacy of evidence-based psychological treatment for EDs – or the need for adaptations – in a wider, more representative range of patients is greatly needed. However, such trials are time consuming and costly. Borrowing language from the education model of accommodations (equitable access to the same content) and modifications (change in the content and expectations) (McGlynn and Kelly, Reference McGlynn and Kelly2019), we propose that in the meantime, rather than modifying the treatments and risk diluting their potency, we can identify the barriers that prevent patients from accessing recommended treatments and work to remove them. In education, accommodations are designed to promote equity in learning by assuring that all students have access to the same teaching content with the expectation that this will provide the same potential to learn. Translating this concept to the provision of psychological treatment, the aim is to increase complete access to the therapy for all individuals who need it. Our experience suggests that barriers that are especially likely to be encountered by individuals with low income can be overcome when appropriate accommodations, rather than modifications, are implemented.

Barriers

To know where accommodations may be needed and what form they might take, barriers to equal access for therapy must first be identified. Table 1 lists the barriers we have encountered and also the potential remedies we use in our clinic. Below, barriers are illustrated using composite case vignettes and we offer additional ideas about accommodations based on available data and clinical experience. We consider barriers that are encountered by many individuals seeking psychological treatment and highlight how certain barriers are likely experienced more acutely by patients with low income. Additionally, we explore treatment barriers unique to patients with EDs and low income (e.g. food insecurity, access to means for food preparation and storage) and suggest possible accommodations based on our clinical work.

Table 1.

Identified ED treatment barriers, accommodations and considerations

Case-based examples

1. Poor case identification

J, a Black, 68-year-old, straight, cisgender man was receiving treatment for social anxiety in a community mental health clinic. Although his longstanding anxiety symptoms were clearly impacting many aspects of his life, they centred on concerns about body shape, weight, and eating. When therapeutic progress was slow, his therapist considered if his social anxiety was related to an underlying ED. J had never been assessed for an ED and was reluctant. He asked how it could be possible for a man of his size (he was in a larger body, body mass index (BMI) of 39) who relied on food from a food bank, to have an ED. An assessment determined that J met criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, and that the ED likely dated back to his teens.

Mis-diagnosis and under-diagnosis, well-described elsewhere (Fursland and Watson, Reference Fursland and Watson2014; Kornstein et al., Reference Kornstein, Kunovac, Herman and Culpepper2016; Strother et al., Reference Strother, Lemberg, Chariese Stanford, Turberville, Cohn and Lemberg2013), are associated with low rates of treatment-seeking for individuals with EDs (Hart et al., Reference Hart, Granillo, Jorm and Paxton2011). Reluctance to seek care may be fuelled by shame and stigma, poor mental health literacy (Grammer et al., Reference Grammer, Shah, Laboe, McGinnis, Balantekin, Graham, Smolar, Taylor, Wilfley and Fitzsimmons-Craft2022; Hamilton et al., Reference Hamilton, Mitchison, Basten, Byrne, Goldstein, Hay, Heruc, Thornton and Touyz2022; Sonneville and Lipson, Reference Sonneville and Lipson2018), denial of the illness and the belief that others cannot help (Radunz et al., Reference Radunz, Ali and Wade2023). Delays in diagnosis or treatment-seeking are especially prominent in historically marginalized ethnic/racial groups, men, and individuals in larger bodies (Becker et al., Reference Becker, Franko, Speck and Herzog2003; Coffino et al., Reference Coffino, Udo and Grilo2019; Garb, Reference Garb2021; Gewirtz O’Brien et al., Reference Gewirtz O’Brien, Sim, Narr, Mattke, Billings, Jacobson and Lebow2021; Harrop, Reference Harrop2020; Marques et al., Reference Marques, Alegria, Becker, Chen, Fang, Chosak and Diniz2011; Sonneville and Lipson, Reference Sonneville and Lipson2018), which may be related to higher levels of stigma felt by these groups (Benuto et al., Reference Benuto, Gonzalez, Reinosa-Segovia and Duckworth2019; Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Mond, Li, Gunatilake, Murray, Sheffield and Touyz2015). Unfortunately, early descriptions of individuals with EDs – focusing nearly exclusively on white, young, cisgender women, from higher socioeconomic backgrounds (Smolak and Striegel-Moore, Reference Smolak, Striegel-Moore, Striegel-Moore and Smolak2001) – inform implicit bias.

To reduce stigma and increase awareness, our clinic (S.B.-S., E.A.) holds virtual seminars throughout the year and on request for schools, libraries, and community health clinics, and offers guidance on screening tools and treatment referrals. The educational content emphasizes that EDs are treatable serious illnesses that may affect individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, and weight.

Broader educational efforts to improve knowledge about ED diagnosis among healthcare providers and trainees are also underway globally. Newer educational initiatives that leverage technology to reach trainees efficiently and effectively may be low-cost options (Kerfoot et al., Reference Kerfoot, Baker, Pangaro, Agarwal, Taffet, Mechaber and Armstrong2012; Maguire et al., Reference Maguire, Li, Cunich and Maloney2019; Raffoul et al., Reference Raffoul, Vitagliano, Sarda, Chan, Chwa, Ferreira, Gooding, Forman and Austin2022). To this end, our group (D.R.G., E.A.) created PreparED, a freely available, US-based, online curriculum for healthcare trainees and non-specialist providers (Glasofer et al., Reference Glasofer, Pagano, Liebling and Attia2020; Glasofer and Attia, Reference Glasofer and Attia2021).

When providing seminars and other education guidance we strongly encourage the use of ED-specific screening tools. These measures assist in accurate identification of EDs and have a demonstrable positive impact on referrals when used by general practitioners (Wade et al., Reference Wade, Johnson, Cadman and Cook2022). It is also recommended that all initial psychiatric evaluations include screenings for EDs (Crone et al., Reference Crone, Fochtmann, Attia, Boland, Escobar, Fornari, Golden, Guarda, Jackson-Triche, Manzo, Mascolo, Pierce, Riddle, Seritan, Uniacke, Zucker, Yager, Craig, Hong and Medicus2023). Several transdiagnostic and diagnostic specific, brief screeners exist (Gormally et al., Reference Gormally, Black, Daston and Rardin1982; Maguen et al., Reference Maguen, Hebenstreit, Li, Dinh, Donalson, Dalton, Rubin and Masheb2018; Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Reid and Lacey1999; Stice et al., Reference Stice, Telch and Rizvi2000; Yanovski et al., Reference Yanovski, Marcus, Wadden and Walsh2015).

2. Inadequate numbers of trained therapists

P, a 24-year-old, Asian-American man, was aware of the recommended treatments for bulimia nervosa. He contacted our center looking for a specific type of evidence-based treatment. He reported that he had called what felt like ‘hundreds’ of therapists on a referral website only to find that very few therapists provided this therapy and none of them were in his area or had openings. P described feeling hopeless about receiving the treatment he needed.

The paucity of therapists trained in evidence-based treatments for EDs is a major barrier (Cooper and Bailey-Straebler, Reference Cooper and Bailey-Straebler2015) and is likely even more pronounced in clinics serving individuals with low income (Accurso et al., Reference Accurso, Buckelew and Snowden2021). Training typically consists of an expert-led workshop, reading an associated treatment guide, and clinical supervision. However, few therapists receive this training (Kazdin et al., Reference Kazdin, Fitzsimmons-Craft and Wilfley2017), primarily due to associated fees and indirect costs (i.e. time away from work) (Pagoto et al., Reference Pagoto, Spring, Coups, Mulvaney, Coutu and Ozakinci2007). In the US, the majority of therapists with training credentials to offer these treatments do not accept third-party payment (i.e. insurance plan coverage) for this care, instead requiring out-of-pocket payment (Accurso et al., Reference Accurso, Buckelew and Snowden2021), making these treatments impossible for patients with low income to access.

Some cost-effective training methods are available, which we utilize in our clinic. Low-cost asynchronous web-based training, for example, is an option for ED treatments such as enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E) (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Becker-Haimes and Kendall2020). Once trained, treatment session adherence checklists (e.g. Bailey-Straebler et al., Reference Bailey-Straebler, Cooper, Grave, Calugi and Murphy2022) may be a helpful method to reduce therapeutic drift and ensure fidelity to the selected approach (Waller and Turner, Reference Waller and Turner2016).

Task-shifting/sharing (training non-specialists, i.e. peers, to provide therapy), program-led (e.g. app-based) and low-intensity treatments (self-help books; 6 hours or less of therapist contact) are additional cost-effective ways to overcome the challenge of inadequate numbers of trained therapists (Davey et al., Reference Davey, Bennett, Bryant-Waugh, Micali, Takeda, Alexandrou and Shafran2023; Fairburn and Patel, Reference Fairburn and Patel2014). Unfortunately, these options are not available to patients with low income who receive government-funded health insurance in the US, where reimbursement requirements stipulate that only licensed therapists can provide psychological treatment.

3. Direct and indirect treatment costs

S, a 43-year-old transgender Chinese woman with binge eating disorder, lived about 75 miles from our clinic and relied on public transportation. The cost (close to $100 roundtrip return ticket train fare and taxi fare from the station to the clinic) to attend the required in-person evaluation was unaffordable. Fortunately, we were able to arrange transportation for her through her public insurance. Footnote 1 S reported that this was a ‘huge relief’ and without this option she would not have been able to attend the evaluation session, which would have made her ineligible for treatment.

Cost of treatment is a frequently cited barrier to ED treatment (Ali et al., Reference Ali, Farrer, Fassnacht, Gulliver, Bauer and Griffiths2017). This includes direct (e.g. session fees) and indirect (e.g. loss of work time, transportation, childcare) costs. Although telehealth has greatly reduced transportation-associated costs such as train fare, parking fees, or petrol, it has created other related treatment costs (e.g. cost of mobile devices, internet access, and electricity use). Additionally, there remain times when travel costs continue to prevent attendance (Bischoff et al., Reference Bischoff, Hollist, Smith and Flack2004). For example, some patients with EDs prefer in-person sessions (Pagano et al., Reference Pagano, Glasofer, Attia, Ruggiero, Eziri, Goldstein and Steinglass2023), and some services are required to see patients in-person for evaluation sessions or prior to prescribing controlled substances. For these situations, therapists are encouraged to investigate available transportation schemes. In the US this includes transportation provided by some types of government-based insurance and in the UK the National Health Services’ (NHS) Healthcare Travel Costs Scheme may provide travel reimbursement to eligible participants (based on income and/or disability) (National Health Service, 2020).

There are multiple hidden costs to sessions conducted via telehealth. Telehealth necessitates that patients have access to computers, tablets or smartphones capable of hosting or maintaining an adequate wireless connection to the required telehealth platform (e.g. app or website). Telehealth also incurs further costs related to internet and electricity, described in detail below. Additionally, this modality has resulted in patients needing to buy or be provided with weighing scales to be used at home during sessions for treatment plans that require regular weight monitoring. When possible, we provide patients with weighing scales that have been donated to our clinic.

Cost of other treatment materials is also a factor worth considering. For example, many ED treatments rely on the use of nutritional supplement drinks to help patients regain weight. These drinks are extremely costly when sold individually. In locations where these drinks are not freely supplied to patients in need, it can be useful to explore if a patient’s health insurance will pay for them. In the US, for instance, some government-funded insurance will cover the cost when drinks are deemed medically necessary and prescribed like medication. Equally it is important to consider the costs of any between-session work. Some treatments suggest supplementary reading materials. Borrowing from the Books on Prescription model utilized by the NHS (Brewster, Reference Brewster2009), we frequently partner with local libraries to provide access to these reading materials (e.g. Overcoming Binge Eating; Fairburn, Reference Fairburn2013). Treatments also encourage engaging in distraction activities or returning to hobbies. Finding low-cost or cost-free activities that are accessible in the patient’s location is essential. Finally, sometimes there is the need to have patients obtain new clothing. This may be related to changes in weight or as a part of tackling body avoidance. Charity shops provide an option for low-cost clothing.

4. Circumstances impacting treatment implementation

D, a 17-year-old, Hispanic, straight, cisgender man with anorexia nervosa, restricting subtype. D’s parents worked long hours without much flexibility. Although he had extended family nearby, D’s parents had concerns about involving other family members in meal preparation or support. Due to the family’s constraints, he was recommended to receive a primarily individually based, rather than family-based, treatment. D’s parents felt confident that he would independently attend sessions regularly and that they could support him in completing homework assignments and participate in a handful of sessions.

In our experience, implementing family-based therapies (e.g. family-based therapy (FBT) for anorexia nervosa/the ‘Maudsley Method’) has been challenging and extra burdensome for some of our families with low income. A sizable proportion of these families are single-parent households, or households in which parents work more than one job to support the family. This understandably impacts parents’ availability to prepare and supervise meals, which can have downstream effects on the effective implementation of family-based therapies. Providing accommodations such as additional support via extra therapy sessions and increased school involvement has been helpful, although is often insufficient. Of note, in cases where families with low income are able to fully implement FBT, we have seen great successes. It is therefore crucial to ensure that patients and families can effectively implement suggested treatments. Careful assessment and consideration of the patient and family’s ability to effectively utilize the treatment prior to starting treatment has allowed for more appropriate treatment allocation. For example, family-based therapies and individual/adolescent-based therapies (e.g. adolescent focused therapy (AFT) or CBT-E for adolescents) are recommended treatments for youth with restrictive EDs (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2017); and while there are no clear predictors of outcome in favour of one versus the other (Le Grange et al., Reference Le Grange, Eckhardt, Dalle Grave, Crosby, Peterson, Keery, Lesser and Martell2020), the treatments differ in terms of the optimal environment for success (full description of AFT here: Fitzpatrick et al., Reference Fitzpatrick, Moye, Rienecke, Lock and Grange2010; and full description and comparison on FBT and CBT-E here: Dalle Grave et al., Reference Dalle Grave, Eckhardt, Calugi and Le Grange2019). Consequently, all are reasonable choices and therapists can make thoughtful, informed recommendations based on the available home support and family preference.

5. A lack of cultural humility

In both the UK and US, individuals meeting criteria for low income represent ethnically diverse backgrounds and cultures (Department for Work and Pensions, 2022; Donohue et al., Reference Donohue, Cole, James, Jarlenski, Michener and Roberts2022). Therapist cultural awareness improves patient and family engagement in treatment and is associated with decreased rates of treatment drop-out. Some (Heim and Kohrt, Reference Heim and Kohrt2019; Perera et al., Reference Perera, Salamanca-Sanabria, Caballero-Bernal, Feldman, Hansen, Bird, Hansen, Dinesen, Wiedemann and Vallières2020) have argued in favour of adapting treatments to achieve cultural humility, while others believe that doing so has the potential to dilute treatments, rendering them less effective or place them at risk for missing individual variations that exist within similar cultural groups (Hall et al., Reference Hall, Ibaraki, Huang, Marti and Stice2016; Healey et al., Reference Healey, Stager, Woodmass, Dettlaff, Vergara, Janke and Wells2017). There has been limited work exploring cultural adaptations to ED treatment, with initial studies suggesting that only minor modifications may be required (e.g. devising meal plans that incorporate culturally familiar foods) (Acle et al., Reference Acle, Cook, Siegfried and Beasley2021; Shea et al., Reference Shea, Cachelin, Uribe, Striegel, Thompson and Wilson2012; Shea et al., Reference Shea, Cachelin, Gutierrez, Wang and Phimphasone2016).

To increase cultural humility in our clinic, we work to (1) increase therapist cultural sensitivity and awareness; (2) encourage the use of culturally informed interviews; and (3) consider ways that ED treatment and culture intersect. These efforts combined serve as a foundation for therapists to assess the family’s and patient’s views of mental illness (and EDs specifically) and psychological treatment.

We encourage all staff to attend ongoing professional development and discussions on topics such as: the impact of a patient’s culture on their illness, engagement in treatment, and symptom description; the possibility of culturally specific stigma; and relevant treatment adaptations (Cherestal et al., Reference Cherestal, Salajegheh, Waltman and Kanellopoulos2023). Ongoing supervision then retains an attunement to culture.

Incorporating the tone and style of questions included on the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) can be helpful. The CFI is a 16–question mental health assessment tool, designed to inform clinicians on the impact of culture on clinical presentation. Where relevant, we add questions focused on food and eating. For example, in the section on cultural identity we include: ‘Food is often an important part of one’s culture and identity. Many cultures and religions engage in events/celebrations throughout the year, for example days of fasting or periods of feasting. For you/your family, what important events/celebrations/important religious obligations include eating/not eating/eating specific foods?’.

Standard eating practices are often culturally bound, including food choices (e.g. restrictions around certain meat or fish products), the availability of and family practices around food (e.g. individual roles in grocery shopping or food preparation, eating environment and mealtimes), and holiday customs. Cultural norms for beauty related to body shape, weight and height can also greatly impact treatment. If EDs are viewed as lifestyle choices rather than mental illnesses with potentially life-threatening physical correlates (Hamilton et al., Reference Hamilton, Mitchison, Basten, Byrne, Goldstein, Hay, Heruc, Thornton and Touyz2022), psychoeducation about the seriousness and dangerousness of these disorders is emphasized.

6. Food insecurity

S is a 12-year-old white cisgender girl with anorexia nervosa, binge-purge subtype. Due to low income, her parents struggled to provide enough food for their family. The clinic provided support in several ways: (1) involving S’s school to get her the available free food options, (2) assisting her parents in registering for a national government food assistance program, (3) connecting her parents to local food banks, and (4) guiding her family in seeking school-based accommodations under Section 504 of The Rehabilitation Act, Footnote 2 which granted S access to support while eating and a quiet space to engage in telehealth therapy sessions during the school day.

Once the family was more food secure, we assisted S in overcoming other food-related challenges. Many foods provided by the school and the food bank were items that she avoided due to fear of weight gain. The foods delivered by the food bank and government-funded program were tied to a calendar, which inadvertently worsened her feast-or-famine mentality. S’s therapist, aware of how food insecurity and food assistance programs inform cycles of restriction and binge eating, coached her parents to take responsibility for portioning out foods when they arrived. Everyone in the family understood the importance of eating roughly similar amounts throughout the month to protect against the cycle.

Food insecurity, a ‘lack of consistent access to enough food for every person in a household to live an active, healthy life’ (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2022), is associated with worse health outcomes (Kushel et al., Reference Kushel, Gupta, Gee and Haas2006) and disproportionately impacts individuals with low income and those from marginalized racial/ethnic groups (Myers and Painter, Reference Myers and Painter2017). In 2020, nearly 15% of US households with children experienced food insecurity, with the numbers dramatically increasing throughout the pandemic (Wolfson and Leung, Reference Wolfson and Leung2020). In the UK, numbers of those experiencing food insecurity are similar (Environmental Audit Committee, 2019). A recent UK-wide survey of ED health professionals highlighted insufficient awareness of food insecurity and strongly called for the development of guidance, training, and a policy response from the government (Kuehne et al., Reference Kuehne, Hemmings, Phillips, İnce, Chounkaria, Ferraro, Pimblett, Sharpe and Schmidt2023).

Given that food is the primary medicine in many ED treatments, it is unsurprising that issues related to food scarcity would uniquely affect individuals with these disorders. The impact appears particularly pronounced in EDs that are characterized by binge eating (i.e. bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, anorexia nervosa binge purge subtype) (Hazzard et al., Reference Hazzard, Loth, Hooper and Becker2020). While the mechanism of the relationship remains unclear, one possibility is the restriction–binge cycle may be influenced by federal programs in place to assist individuals with low income. In the US, assistance typically renews on a monthly basis. Individuals may over-eat when there is an abundance of food at the start of the cycle and be forced to restrict their eating as resources wane towards the end of the cycle, potentially promoting the ‘feast-or-famine’ cycle of food availability known to be associated with problematic eating behaviours (Hazzard et al., Reference Hazzard, Loth, Hooper and Becker2020).

7. Housing, energy, and technology insecurity

When M, an Italian American 19-year-old cisgender woman, started treatment in our clinic for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), she and her family had stable housing and were living with other family members. In the years prior, they had struggled to secure housing, twice faced eviction from their apartment, and once lived in an emergency housing shelter for homeless families. In the present housing arrangement, although M’s family was able to pay their rent, they were frequently unable to pay associated living costs including their electricity bill. As a result, M worried about the cost of warming and cooking foods. Helping M to broaden her array of meals while planning for foods that could be eaten with little preparation was essential.

Difficulty paying rent, facing eviction, frequent moving, overcrowding, and poor neighbourhood safety/quality, are all barriers to health care among individuals with low income (Kushel et al., Reference Kushel, Gupta, Gee and Haas2006). Energy insecurity, the ‘inability to adequately meet basic household energy needs’ (Hernández, Reference Hernández2016), can include difficulties in affording heating, cooling and electricity. Immigrants, individuals with low income, and those identifying as from a historically marginalized ethnic/racial group disproportionately encounter both housing and energy insecurity (Memmott et al., Reference Memmott, Carley, Graff and Konisky2021). In the US, energy insecurity is a factor for roughly 30% of the US population (Hernández and Laird, Reference Hernández and Laird2022; Beall and Hronis, Reference Beall and Hronis2022) and according to 2021 UK census data, adults with an annual personal income below £30,000 were nearly three times as likely to report energy insecurity than those with an annual personal income over £40,000 (Office for National Statistics, 2023).

For patients who opt for telehealth, taking time to determine what kinds of technology (internet access and devices) are available in the home, available space to have the session, as well as comfort level in using online technologies is important. In the US, individuals from historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups and those with low income are less likely than their white and higher-income counterparts to have internet access (Ko et al., Reference Ko, El-Toukhy, Quintero, Wilkerson, Nápoles, Stewart and Strassle2023). Prevalence of households with no internet may be as high as 21–29% for Black and Hispanic youth with low-income nationally (Dolcini et al., Reference Dolcini, Canchola, Catania, Song Mayeda, Dietz, Cotto-Negrón and Narayanan2021). In the UK, as of 2018, 10% of the adult population faced ‘digital exclusion’, with those in lower income levels, ethnic minorities, older adults, and those with disabilities being the most disadvantaged (Office for National Statistics, 2019).

The scope of the problem is vast, and the role that physical space and access to electricity play in supporting elements of ED treatment such as food preparation and storage, and internet access and privacy for telehealth sessions are noteworthy. Therapists are advised to approach this barrier similarly to food insecurity, to assess carefully and provide guidance on relevant governmental, community, or non-profit charitable support resources.

8. Limited accessibility of treatment materials

To provide equal access to treatment, we must deliver care in the language most understood by patients. Limited English proficiency (LEP) (or limited primary language proficiency in locations where English is not the primary language) leads to health disparities associated with low mental health literacy, less disclosure, and inappropriate diagnosis (Bauer and Alegría, Reference Bauer and Alegría2010; Foiles Sifuentes et al., Reference Foiles Sifuentes, Robledo Cornejo, Li, Castaneda-Avila, Tjia and Lapane2020; Ohtani et al., Reference Ohtani, Suzuki, Takeuchi and Uchida2015). The highest rates of LEP are found in individuals with low income and among immigrants (Aoki and Santiago, Reference Aoki and Santiago2018; Foiles Sifuentes et al., Reference Foiles Sifuentes, Robledo Cornejo, Li, Castaneda-Avila, Tjia and Lapane2020). For example, in New York State, US, 24% of non-elderly recipients of Medicaid health insurance met criteria for LEP (Haldar et al., Reference Haldar, Artiga, Rudowitz and Damico2022). Similarly in the UK, fewer than half (48%) of individuals who classify as LEP are employed (Office for National Statistics, 2015).

Providing therapy in the patient’s preferred language is ideal given preliminary evidence of improved outcomes and patient satisfaction (Hsueh et al., Reference Hsueh, Hirsh, Maupomé and Stewart2021; Molina and Kasper, Reference Molina and Kasper2019). When possible, therapists fluent in the patient’s language (language-concordant care) should be utilized; however, therapists who speak more than one language are rare. Our service provides in-person, telephone, video- and app-based interpreters for foreign languages and American Sign Language. Use of professional interpreter services is associated with improvements in healthcare outcome (Brandl et al., Reference Brandl, Schreiter and Schouler-Ocak2020) and appears to consistently be more effective than ad hoc interpreters across different modes of treatment delivery (i.e. in-person, on video, by telephone) (Boylen et al., Reference Boylen, Cherian, Gill, Leslie and Wilson2020). It is recommended that patient education materials be checked for reading accessibility and literacy levels, with the aim that all hand-outs be equivalent to the recommended 5th reading level (Stossel et al., Reference Stossel, Segar, Gliatto, Fallar and Karani2012). Utilizing methods such as ‘teach back’ (Griffey et al., Reference Griffey, Shin, Jones, Aginam, Gross, Kinsella, Williams, Carpenter, Goodman and Kaphingst2015) helps clinical staff assess patient understanding and knowledge acquisition.

Future directions

Patients with low income face enormous obstacles in accessing evidence-based treatment. Providing equitable care involves consideration of the needs of individuals with low income including the many related factors that give rise to health disparities such as socioeconomic status, language diversity, and the impact of being from a historically marginalized racial and/or ethnic group. Extending the reach of these treatments is possible with special attention to identifying and removing barriers to accessing treatment. The accommodations reviewed in this paper offer ways to overcome the obstacles patients with low income may encounter when seeking and receiving care.

To improve ED treatment accessibility for patients with low income, the following topics require prioritization:

(1) Further identification and investigation of barriers: fully identifying the barriers individuals with low income encounter when seeking and receiving ED treatment is needed. Many more barriers likely exist than those reviewed here. For example, low income is associated with increased stress levels and co-occurring mental health conditions, all of which can interfere with treatment implementation (Wade et al., Reference Wade, Shafran and Cooper2023) and reduce the effectiveness of psychological treatment (Finegan et al., Reference Finegan, Firth, Wojnarowski and Delgadillo2018). Location-specific barriers related to income also need further exploration (e.g. barriers encountered by patients in countries with nationalized versus single-payer healthcare services, and rural versus urban areas). Importantly, qualitative work involving individuals with lived experience of an ED and low income in terms of accessing and implementing evidence-based treatment is non-existent and crucial to further barrier identification.

(2) Evaluation of clinical efficacy: research is needed to evaluate the impact of the accommodations described here on clinical outcomes. In our experience, removing the barriers listed has allowed patients from a variety of backgrounds to meaningfully engage with and complete evidence-based treatment; our impressions, however, are anecdotal. Large-scale investigations are required to extend the reach of evidence-based psychological treatments equitably, efficiently and effectively.

(3) Exploration of therapist and clinic implications: accommodations are time consuming, often requiring therapists to use valuable clinical hours to take on additional roles resulting in fewer patients being seen. Additionally, providing treatment while managing many different accommodations is mentally burdening and may add to levels of moral distress. Moral distress, characterized as distress caused by repeatedly not being able to carry out professional standards of care (Epstein et al., Reference Epstein, Whitehead, Prompahakul, Thacker and Hamric2019), is associated with negative feelings, compromised patient care, and higher staff turnover (Henrich et al., Reference Henrich, Dodek, Gladstone, Alden, Keenan, Reynolds and Rodney2017). Clinics might also find it econimically unfeasible to pay for the costs of therapist training, treatment material translation, and interpreter provision. Consequently, the financial (and psychological) implications for therapists and clinics might inadvertently create additional barriers for patients with low income. As the field moves forward in improving equitable access to evidence-based ED treatment, it will be essential to evaluate and mitigate the challenges to individual therapists and health care systems.

Key practice points

  1. (1) Psychological treatment for EDs can be effectively implemented for a range of patients including those with low income.

  2. (2) Rather than offering evidence-based interventions in a manner that may dilute their potency, thoughtful, modest accommodations are ideal to extend the reach of first-line treatments.

  3. (3) When implementing ED treatment, therapists are encouraged to assess for barriers that may prevent a patient from fully engaging with the therapy. These obstacles include, but are not limited to: food, housing, and energy insecurity; associated direct and indirect treatment costs; cultural factors that are individual to each patient.

Data availability statement

Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Acknowledgements

We thank George Alexopoulos, Justin Chen, Rachel Moster and Katharine Phillips for their feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. We are grateful to Maura Lehr and Michael McIntosh for their support of this program. We especially thank and highlight the contributions of Samantha Berlow, Melissa Cemel, Laura Cordella, Fayrisa Greenwald and Dominique White for providing the treatment described in this paper.

Author contribution

Suzanne Bailey-Straebler: Conceptualization (lead), Writing – original draft (equal), Writing – review & editing (equal); Deborah R. Glasofer: Conceptualization (supporting), Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (lead); Jessica Ojeda: Formatting manuscript and references (lead); Writing – review (supporting); Evelyn Attia: Writing – review & editing (supporting).

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

S.B.-S., J.O.: none; D.R.G. has received honoraria from Oxford University Press. E.A. receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer and serves on the Clinical Advisory Board of Equip Health, Inc.

Ethical standard

In our treatment and provision of care we have abided by the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct as set out by the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies and the British Psychological Society. The vignettes presented represent composite cases resembling the types of patients we typically encounter in our clinic. There are no identifying features of any specific patients. Therefore, no patient consent was required.

Footnotes

*

Joint first authors.

1 In the US, third-party payment for health care includes health insurance plans that are either offered by private companies (aka ‘commercial insurance’), or by government programs (aka ‘public insurance’), including the federal Medicare program for individuals over 65 years and younger individuals with disabilities, and the state-issued Medicaid programs for individuals with low income.

2 Section 504 is a Federal US civil rights law protecting equal rights of individuals with disabilities, including emotional and mental illness during their school day.

References

Further reading

Finegan, M., Firth, N., Wojnarowski, C., & Delgadillo, J. (2018). Associations between socioeconomic status and psychological therapy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 35, 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22765 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huryk, K. M., Drury, C. R., & Loeb, K. L. (2021). Diseases of affluence? A systematic review of the literature on socioeconomic diversity in eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 43, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101548 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, R., Buckelew, S. M., Accurso, E. C., & Raymond-Flesch, M. (2023). Disparities in access to eating disorders treatment for publicly-insured youth and youth of color: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00730-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Accurso, E. C., Buckelew, S. M., & Snowden, L. R. (2021). Youth insured by Medicaid with restrictive eating disorders-underrecognized and underresourced. JAMA Pediatrics, 175, 999–1000. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2081 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acle, A., Cook, B. J., Siegfried, N., & Beasley, T. (2021). Cultural considerations in the treatment of eating disorders among racial/ethnic minorities: a systematic review. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52, 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211017664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, K., Farrer, L., Fassnacht, D. B., Gulliver, A., Bauer, S., & Griffiths, K. M. (2017). Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help-seeking for eating disorders: a systematic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22598 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Y., & Santiago, L. (2018). Deprivation, segregation, and socioeconomic class of UK immigrants: eoes English proficiency matter? IZA Discussion Paper No. 11368. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3137499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey-Straebler, S., Cooper, Z., Grave, R. D., Calugi, S., & Murphy, R. (2022). Development of the CBT-E Components Checklist: a tool for measuring therapist self-rated adherence to CBT-E. Italian Journal of Eating Disorders and Obesity, 4, 6–10.Google Scholar
Bauer, A. M., & Alegría, M. (2010). Impact of patient language proficiency and interpreter service use on the quality of psychiatric care: a systematic review. Psychiatric Services, 61, 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.8.765 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beall, R., & Hronis, C. (2022). In 2020, 27% of U.S. households had difficulty meeting their energy needs. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=51979 Google Scholar
Becker, A. E., Franko, D. L., Speck, A., & Herzog, D. B. (2003). Ethnicity and differential access to care for eating disorder symptoms. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10129 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benuto, L. T., Gonzalez, F., Reinosa-Segovia, F., & Duckworth, M. (2019). Mental health literacy, stigma, and behavioral health service use: the case of Latinx and non-Latinx Whites. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6, 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-019-00614-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bischoff, R. J., Hollist, C. S., Smith, C. W., & Flack, P. (2004). Addressing the mental health needs of the rural underserved: findings from a multiple case study of a behavioral telehealth project. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COFT.0000031242.83259.fa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boylen, S., Cherian, S., Gill, F. J., Leslie, G. D., & Wilson, S. (2020). Impact of professional interpreters on outcomes for hospitalized children from migrant and refugee families with limited English proficiency: a systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18, 1360–1388. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00300 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandl, E. J., Schreiter, S., & Schouler-Ocak, M. (2020). Are trained medical interpreters worth the cost? A review of the current literature on cost and cost-effectiveness. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 22, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00915-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, L. (2009). Books on prescription: bibliotherapy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 9, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323260903253456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnette, C. B., Luzier, J. L., Weisenmuller, C. M., & Boutté, R. L. (2022). A systematic review of sociodemographic reporting and representation in eating disorder psychotherapy treatment trials in the United States. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55, 423–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23699 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, S. M., Fursland, A., Allen, K. L., & Watson, H. (2011). The effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders: an open trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cachelin, F. M., Rebeck, R., Veisel, C., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (2001). Barriers to treatment for eating disorders among ethnically diverse women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.1084 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervantes, R. C., Gattamorta, K. A., & Berger-Cardoso, J. (2019). Examining difference in immigration stress, acculturation stress and mental health outcomes in six Hispanic/Latino nativity and regional groups. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0714-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherestal, S., Salajegheh, A., Waltman, B., & Kanellopoulos, D. (2023). Two models for developing diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in psychiatric academic medical centers. Academic Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01816-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffino, J. A., Udo, T., & Grilo, C. M. (2019). Rates of help-seeking in US adults with lifetime DSM-5 eating disorders: prevalence across diagnoses and differences by sex and ethnicity/race. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94, 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.030 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, Z., & Bailey-Straebler, S. (2015). Disseminating evidence-based psychological treatments for eating disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0551-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crone, C., Fochtmann, L. J., Attia, E., Boland, R., Escobar, J., Fornari, V., Golden, N., Guarda, A., Jackson-Triche, M., Manzo, L., Mascolo, M., Pierce, K., Riddle, M., Seritan, A., Uniacke, B., Zucker, N., Yager, J., Craig, T. J., Hong, S.-H., & Medicus, J. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.23180001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalle Grave, R., Eckhardt, S., Calugi, S., & Le Grange, D. (2019). A conceptual comparison of family-based treatment and enhanced cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of adolescents with eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-019-0275-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant-Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2023). Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department for Work and Pensions (2022). Persistent low income. GOV.UK. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/pay-and-income/low-income/latest Google Scholar
Dolcini, M. M., Canchola, J. A., Catania, J. A., Song Mayeda, M. M., Dietz, E. L., Cotto-Negrón, C., & Narayanan, V. (2021). National-level disparities in internet access among low-income and Black and Hispanic youth: current population survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23, e27723. https://doi.org/10.2196/27723 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donohue, J. M., Cole, E. S., James, C. V., Jarlenski, M., Michener, J. D., & Roberts, E. T. (2022). The US Medicaid program: coverage, financing, reforms, and implications For health equity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 328,1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.14791 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Environmental Audit Committee (2019). Sustainable Development Goals in the UK follow-up; Hunger, malnutrition and food insecurity in the UK (13). House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvaud/1491/1491.pdf Google Scholar
Epstein, E. G., Whitehead, P. B., Prompahakul, C., Thacker, L. R., & Hamric, A. B. (2019). Enhancing understanding of moral distress: the measure of moral distress for health care professionals. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 10, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erskine, H. E., Whiteford, H. A., & Pike, K. M. (2016). The global burden of eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29, 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000276 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, C. G. (2013). Overcoming Binge Eating: The Proven Program to Learn Why you Binge and How you can Stop (2nd edn). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fairburn, C. G., Bailey-Straebler, S., Basden, S., Doll, H. A., Jones, R., Murphy, R., O’Connor, M. E., & Cooper, Z. (2015). A transdiagnostic comparison of enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E) and interpersonal psychotherapy in the treatment of eating disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 70, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn, K., Hawker, D. M., Wales, J. A., & Palmer, R. L. (2009). Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040608 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, C. G., & Patel, V. (2014). The global dissemination of psychological treatments: a roadmap for research and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13111546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichter, M. M., & Quadflieg, N. (2016). Mortality in eating disorders-results of a large prospective clinical longitudinal study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 391–401. https://doi.org10.1002/eat.22501 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finegan, M., Firth, N., Wojnarowski, C., & Delgadillo, J. (2018). Associations between socioeconomic status and psychological therapy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 35, 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22765 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Moye, A., Rienecke, R., Lock, J., & Grange, D. (2010). Adolescent focused psychotherapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-009-9123-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foiles Sifuentes, A. M., Robledo Cornejo, M., Li, N. C., Castaneda-Avila, M. A., Tjia, J., & Lapane, K. L. (2020). The role of limited English proficiency and access to health insurance and health care in the Affordable Care Act era. Health Equity, 4, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2020.0057 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, H. E., Becker-Haimes, E. M., & Kendall, P. C. (2020). Therapist training in evidence-based interventions for mental health: a systematic review of training approaches and outcomes. Clinical Psychology, 27, e12330. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12330 Google ScholarPubMed
Fursland, A., & Watson, H. J. (2014). Eating disorders: a hidden phenomenon in outpatient mental health? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 422–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22205 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garb, H. N. (2021). Race bias and gender bias in the diagnosis of psychological disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 90, 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102087 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewirtz O’Brien, J. R., Sim, L., Narr, C., Mattke, A., Billings, M., Jacobson, R. M., & Lebow, J. (2021). Addressing disparities in adolescent eating disorders: a case report of family-based treatment in primary care. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 35, 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2020.11.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasofer, D. R., & Attia, E. (2021). Eating disorders education for all: Increasing access to medical students via e-learning [Paper presentation]. Quarterly Meeting of Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry, Virtual.Google Scholar
Glasofer, D. R., Pagano, N., Liebling, S., & Attia, E. (2020). PrepareED: Eating Disorders Education for the Clinicians of Tomorrow. https://prepared.nyspi.org/ Google Scholar
Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S., & Rardin, D. (1982). The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addictive Behaviors, 7, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, A. C., Shah, J., Laboe, A. A., McGinnis, C. G., Balantekin, K. N., Graham, A. K., Smolar, L., Taylor, C. B., Wilfley, D. E., & Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E. (2022). Predictors of treatment seeking and uptake among respondents to a widely disseminated online eating disorders screen in the United States. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55, 1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23760 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffey, R., Shin, N., Jones, S., Aginam, N., Gross, M., Kinsella, Y., Williams, J. A., Carpenter, C. R., Goodman, M., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2015). The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: a randomized, controlled study. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, S., Mond, J. M., Li, Z., Gunatilake, S., Murray, S. B., Sheffield, J., & Touyz, S. (2015). Self-stigma of seeking treatment and being male predict an increased likelihood of having an undiagnosed eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 775–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22413 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haldar, S., Artiga, S., Rudowitz, R., & Damico, A. (2022). Unwinding of the PHE: Maintaining Medicaid for People with Limited English Proficiency. KFF. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/unwinding-of-the-phe-maintaining-medicaid-for-people-with-limited-english-proficiency/ Google Scholar
Hall, G. C. N., Ibaraki, A. Y., Huang, E. R., Marti, C. N., & Stice, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of cultural adaptations of psychological interventions. Behavior Therapy, 47, 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, A., Mitchison, D., Basten, C., Byrne, S., Goldstein, M., Hay, P., Heruc, G., Thornton, C., & Touyz, S. (2022). Understanding treatment delay: perceived barriers preventing treatment-seeking for eating disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211020102 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrop, E. (2020). ‘Maybe I Really Am Too Fat to Have an Eating Disorder’: A Mixed Methods Study of Weight Stigma and Healthcare Experiences in a Diverse Sample of Patients with Atypical Anorexia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, University of Washington ResearchWorks Archive. https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/46576 Google Scholar
Hart, L. M., Granillo, M. T., Jorm, A. F., & Paxton, S. J. (2011). Unmet need for treatment in the eating disorders: a systematic review of eating disorder specific treatment seeking among community cases. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartman-Munick, S. M., Silverstein, S., Guss, C. E., Lopez, E., Calzo, J. P., & Gordon, A. R. (2021). Eating disorder screening and treatment experiences in transgender and gender diverse young adults. Eating Behaviors, 41, 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101517 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, A. G., & Gumport, N. B. (2015). Evidence-based psychological treatments for mental disorders: modifiable barriers to access and possible solutions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 68, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.02.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazzard, V. M., Loth, K. A., Hooper, L., & Becker, C. B. (2020). Food insecurity and eating disorders: a review of emerging evidence. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22, 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01200-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healey, P., Stager, M. L., Woodmass, K., Dettlaff, A. J., Vergara, A., Janke, R., & Wells, S. J. (2017). Cultural adaptations to augment health and mental health services: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 17, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1953-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heim, E., & Kohrt, B. A. (2019). Cultural adaptation of scalable psychological interventions: a new conceptual framework. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 1, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i4.37679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, N. J., Dodek, P. M., Gladstone, E., Alden, L., Keenan, S. P., Reynolds, S., & Rodney, P. (2017). Consequences of moral distress in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study. American Journal of Critical Care, 26, e48–e57. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017786 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernández, D. (2016). Understanding ‘energy insecurity’ and why it matters to health. Social Science & Medicine, 167, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.029 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernández, D., & Laird, J. (2022). Surviving a shut-off: U.S. households at greatest risk of utility disconnections and how they cope. American Behavioral Scientist, 66, 856–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211013401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsueh, L., Hirsh, A. T., Maupomé, G., & Stewart, J. C. (2021). Patient-provider language concordance and health outcomes: a systematic review, evidence map, and research agenda. Medical Care Research and Review, 78, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558719860708 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huryk, K. M., Drury, C. R., & Loeb, K. L. (2021). Diseases of affluence? A systematic review of the literature on socioeconomic diversity in eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 43, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101548 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwajomo, T., Bondy, S. J., de Oliveira, C., Colton, P., Trottier, K., & Kurdyak, P. (2021). Excess mortality associated with eating disorders: population-based cohort study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 219, 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.197 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Addressing the treatment gap: a key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 88, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A. E., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., & Wilfley, D. E. (2017). Addressing critical gaps in the treatment of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22670 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerfoot, B. P., Baker, H., Pangaro, L., Agarwal, K., Taffet, G., Mechaber, A. J., & Armstrong, E. G. (2012). An online spaced-education game to teach and assess medical students: a multi-institutional prospective trial. Academic Medicine, 87, 1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318267743a CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kivimäki, M., Batty, G. D., Pentti, J., Shipley, M. J., Sipilä, P. N., Nyberg, S. T., Suominen, S. B., Oksanen, T., Stenholm, S., Virtanen, M., Marmot, M. G., Singh-Manoux, A., Brunner, E. J., Lindbohm, J. V., Ferrie, J. E., & Vahtera, J. (2020). Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: a multi-cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 5, e140–e149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30248-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, J. S., El-Toukhy, S., Quintero, S. M., Wilkerson, M. J., Nápoles, A. M., Stewart, A. L., & Strassle, P. D. (2023). Disparities in telehealth access, not willingness to use services, likely explain rural telehealth disparities. Journal of Rural Health, 39, 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornstein, S. G., Kunovac, J. L., Herman, B. K., & Culpepper, L. (2016). Recognizing binge-eating disorder in the clinical setting: a review of the literature. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 18, 24032. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15r01905 Google ScholarPubMed
Kuehne, C., Hemmings, A., Phillips, M., İnce, B., Chounkaria, M., Ferraro, C., Pimblett, C., Sharpe, H., & Schmidt, U. (2023). A UK-wide survey of healthcare professionals’ awareness, knowledge and skills of the impact of food insecurity on eating disorder treatment. Eating Behaviors, 49, 101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101740 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushel, M. B., Gupta, R., Gee, L., & Haas, J. S. (2006). Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00278.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, N., Loth, K. A., Eisenberg, M. E., Hazzard, V. M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2021). Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating are prevalent problems among U.S. young people from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds: findings from the EAT 2010–2018 study. Eating Behaviors, 42, 101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101535 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Grange, D., Eckhardt, S., Dalle Grave, R., Crosby, R. D., Peterson, C. B., Keery, H., Lesser, J., & Martell, C. (2020). Enhanced cognitive-behavior therapy and family-based treatment for adolescents with an eating disorder: a non-randomized effectiveness trial. Psychological Medicine, 52, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720004407 Google ScholarPubMed
Le Grange, D., Lock, J., Agras, W. S., Bryson, S. W., & Jo, B. (2015). Randomized clinical trial of family-based treatment and cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent bulimia nervosa. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 54, 886–894.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.08.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguen, S., Hebenstreit, C., Li, Y., Dinh, J. V., Donalson, R., Dalton, S., Rubin, E., & Masheb, R. (2018). Screen for disordered eating: improving the accuracy of eating disorder screening in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry, 50, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.09.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, S., Li, A., Cunich, M., & Maloney, D. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of an evidence-based online training program for health professionals in eating disorders. Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-019-0243-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marques, L., Alegria, M., Becker, A. E., Chen, C.-N., Fang, A., Chosak, A., & Diniz, J. B. (2011). Comparative prevalence, correlates of impairment, and service utilization for eating disorders across US ethnic groups: implications for reducing ethnic disparities in health care access for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20787 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, K., & Kelly, J. (2019). Adaptations, modifications, and accommodations. Science Scope, 43, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memmott, T., Carley, S., Graff, M., & Konisky, D. M. (2021). Sociodemographic disparities in energy insecurity among low-income households before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Energy, 6, article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00763-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchison, D., Hay, P., Slewa-Younan, S., & Mond, J. (2014). The changing demographic profile of eating disorder behaviors in the community. BMC Public Health, 14, 943. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-943 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, R. L., & Kasper, J. (2019). The power of language-concordant care: a call to action for medical schools. BMC Medical Education, 19, 378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1807-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, R., Buckelew, S. M., Accurso, E. C., & Raymond-Flesch, M. (2023). Disparities in access to eating disorders treatment for publicly-insured youth and youth of color: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00730-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, J. F., Reid, F., & Lacey, J. H. (1999). The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ, 319, 1467–1468. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, A. M., & Painter, M. A. (2017). Food insecurity in the United States of America: an examination of race/ethnicity and nativity. Food Security, 9, 1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0733-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health Service (2020). Healthcare Travel Costs Scheme. NHS UK. https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/help-with-health-costs/healthcare-travel-costs-scheme-htcs/ Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017). Eating Disorders: Recognition and Treatment. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG69 Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2015). People who cannot speak English well are more likely to be in poor health. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/language/articles/peoplewhocannotspeakenglishwellaremorelikelytobeinpoorhealth/2015-07-09 Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2019). Exploring the U.K.’s digital divide. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/articles/exploringtheuksdigitaldivide/2019-03-04 Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2023). Characteristics of adults experiencing energy and food insecurity in Great Britain: 22 November to 18 December 2022. ONS Website. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/characteristicsofadultsexperiencingenergyandfoodinsecuritygreatbritain/22novemberto18december2022#characteristics-associated-with-experiencing-energy-insecurity Google Scholar
Ohtani, A., Suzuki, T., Takeuchi, H., & Uchida, H. (2015). Language barriers and access to psychiatric care: a systematic review. Psychiatric Services, 66, 798–805. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400351 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagano, N., Glasofer, D. R., Attia, E., Ruggiero, J., Eziri, K., Goldstein, C. M., & Steinglass, J. E. (2023). Perspectives on relapse prevention following intensive treatment of anorexia nervosa: a focus group study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 56, 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23952 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagoto, S. L., Spring, B., Coups, E. J., Mulvaney, S., Coutu, M. F., & Ozakinci, G. (2007). Barriers and facilitators of evidence‐based practice perceived by behavioral science health professionals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 695–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perera, C., Salamanca-Sanabria, A., Caballero-Bernal, J., Feldman, L., Hansen, M., Bird, M., Hansen, P., Dinesen, C., Wiedemann, N., & Vallières, F. (2020). No implementation without cultural adaptation: a process for culturally adapting low-intensity psychological interventions in humanitarian settings. Conflict and Health, 14, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00290-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulsifer, B. H., Evans, C. L., Capel, L., Lyons-Hunter, M., & Grieco, J. A. (2019). Cross-sectional assessment of mental health and service disparities in a high-risk community. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radunz, M., Ali, K., & Wade, T. D. (2023). Pathways to improve early intervention for eating disorders: findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 56, 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23845 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raffoul, A., Vitagliano, J. A., Sarda, V., Chan, C., Chwa, C., Ferreira, K. B., Gooding, H. C., Forman, S. F., & Austin, S. B. (2022). Evaluation of a one-hour asynchronous video training for eating disorder screening and referral in U.S. Pediatric Primary Care: a pilot study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55, 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23766 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F., & Patel, V. (2020). Poverty, depression, and anxiety: causal evidence and mechanisms. Science, 370, eaay0214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0214 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sareen, J., Afifi, T. O., McMillan, K. A., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2011). Relationship between household income and mental disorders: findings from a population-based longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, M., Cachelin, F., Uribe, L., Striegel, R. H., Thompson, D., & Wilson, G. T. (2012). Cultural adaptation of a cognitive behavior therapy guided self-help program for Mexican American women with binge eating disorders. Journal of Counseling and Development, 90, 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2012.00039.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, M., Cachelin, F. M., Gutierrez, G., Wang, S., & Phimphasone, P. (2016). Mexican American women’s perspectives on a culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help program for binge eating. Psychological Services, 13, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000055 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smolak, L., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (2001). Challenging the myth of the golden girl: Ethnicity and eating disorders. In Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Smolak, L. (eds), Eating Disorders: Innovative Directions in Research and Practice (pp. 111–132). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10403-006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonneville, K. R., & Lipson, S. K. (2018). Disparities in eating disorder diagnosis and treatment according to weight status, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and sex among college students. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51, 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stice, E., Telch, C. F., & Rizvi, S. L. (2000). Development and validation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale: a brief self-report measure of anorexia, bulimia, and binge-eating disorder. Psychological Assessment, 12, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stossel, L. M., Segar, N., Gliatto, P., Fallar, R., & Karani, R. (2012). Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2046-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streatfeild, J., Hickson, J., Austin, S. B., Hutcheson, R., Kandel, J. S., Lampert, J. G., Myers, E. M., Richmond, T. K., Samnaliev, M., Velasquez, K., Weissman, R. S., & Pezzullo, L. (2021). Social and economic cost of eating disorders in the United States: evidence to inform policy action. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 54, 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23486 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strother, E., Lemberg, R., Chariese Stanford, S., & Turberville, D. (2013). Eating disorders in men: underdiagnosed, undertreated, and misunderstood. In Cohn, L., & Lemberg, R. (eds), Current Findings on Males with Eating Disorders (pp. 13–22). Routledge.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2022). Economic Research Service. Definitions of Food Insecurity. USDA. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/definitions-of-food-security/ Google Scholar
van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2020). Review of the burden of eating disorders: mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 33, 521. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000641 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, T. D., Johnson, C., Cadman, K., & Cook, L. (2022). Turning eating disorders screening in primary practice into treatment: a clinical practice approach. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55, 1259–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23732 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, T. D., Shafran, R., & Cooper, Z. (2023). Developing a protocol to address co-occurring mental health conditions in the treatment of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, G., & Turner, H. (2016). Therapist drift redux: why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfson, J. A., & Leung, C. W. (2020). Food insecurity and COVID-19: disparities in early effects for U.S. adults. Nutrients, 12, 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonderlich, S. A., Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Smith, T. L., Klein, M. H., Mitchell, J. E., & Crow, S. J. (2014). A randomized controlled comparison of integrative cognitive-affective therapy (ICAT) and enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for bulimia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 44, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001098 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanovski, S. Z., Marcus, M. D., Wadden, T. A., & Walsh, B. T. (2015). The Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns-5 (QEWP-5): an updated screening instrument for binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Identified ED treatment barriers, accommodations and considerations

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.