Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T09:55:47.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and fresh seed germination in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

Amrit Lamichaney*
Affiliation:
Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India
Pradip Kumar Katiyar
Affiliation:
Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India
Vijay Laxmi
Affiliation:
Division of Basic Science, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India
Aditya Pratap
Affiliation:
Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: amritiipr@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mungbean seeds, despite being protected inside the pod, are susceptible to pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) following rainfall due to lack of fresh seed dormancy (FSD), which deteriorates the quality of the seed/grain produced. Therefore, development of mungbean cultivars with short (10–15 days) period of FSD has become important to curtail losses incurred by PHS. In this study, we investigated variations in PHS, fresh seed germination (FSG) and activity of α-amylase enzyme in diverse mungbean genotypes. There was a wide variation in PHS tolerance and FSG among 163 genotypes examined and 14 genotypes were found to be tolerant (<20%) to PHS. Seed germination in a pod, a measure used to evaluate PHS, varied from 7.14% in germplasm accession Chamu 4 to 82.52% in cultivated variety IPM 2–3. There was a marked increase in α-amylase activity in genotypes showing high FSG and PHS, especially at 48 and 72 h after germination as compared with PHS tolerant genotypes. Therefore, α-amylase can be used as an effective biochemical marker to evaluate a large number of mungbean genotypes for FSD and PHS. Also, the variation in seed germinability as found in this study could be further used for mungbean improvement programme.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Variation in pre-harvest sprouting (PHS). (a) PHS susceptible IPM 2–3, IPM 2–14, Meha, Vambam 1 showing profuse PHS, PHS-tolerant Chamu 4 showing no PHS and Chamu 4 showing intact seeds inside the pod. (b) Distribution of 163 mungbean genotypes for PHS and fresh seed germination (FSG) (c). Data for PHS and FSG were recorded on the 4th day of incubation at 25 °C, 100% RH.

Figure 1

Table 1. General morphological and biochemical parameters for various characters in 163 mungbean genotypes

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Comparison of germination ability. (a) The box plot illustrating the changes in germination (%) of seeds in pod and germination after separation from the pod (4th day of incubation); (b) correlation between fresh seed germination (FSG) and PHS. *, Germination of seed inside pod (PHS); **, FSG after removing from the pod.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Variation in α-amylase activity with germination in 18 selected mungbean genotypes.

Figure 4

Table 2. Genetic estimation of variance component, genotypic (GCV) and phenotypic (PCV) coefficient of variation, broad sense heritability (H) and genetic advance as a percent of mean (GA) for pre-harvest sprouting, fresh seed germination (FSG), water imbibition by seed, water imbibition by pod (WIP) and amylase activity in 163 mungbean genotypes

Figure 5

Table 3. Correlation of fresh seed germination (FSG) and pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) with different characters

Supplementary material: File

Lamichaney et al supplementary material

Lamichaney et al supplementary material 1

Download Lamichaney et al supplementary material(File)
File 124 KB