1 Introduction and main results
In a recent article, Mallick and Mishra [Reference Mallick and Mishra5] studied the matrix Diophantine equation
in a class of
$2\times 2$
integer matrices whose study goes back to Białek and Grytczuk [Reference Białek and Grytczuk1] and to Cao and Grytczuk [Reference Cao and Grytczuk2, Reference Cao and Grytczuk3]. Throughout,
$d$
denotes a fixed nonzero squarefree integer. Białek and Grytczuk [Reference Białek and Grytczuk1] studied Fermat-type equations in the commutative matrix ring
which is isomorphic to the quadratic order
$\mathbb {Z}[\sqrt d]$
via
$\big(\begin {smallmatrix} a & b \\ db & a \end {smallmatrix}\big) \leftrightarrow a + b \sqrt d$
. Cao and Grytczuk [Reference Cao and Grytczuk2, Reference Cao and Grytczuk3] refined this setting by additionally fixing the determinant: for
$l \in \mathbb {Z}$
, they introduced the class
of matrices in
$G_2(d)$
with determinant
$l$
(their notation is
$G_2(k, \Delta )$
, with
$k$
a positive integer; following [Reference Mallick and Mishra5], we allow
$d$
to be an arbitrary nonzero squarefree integer). The motivation for working in these classes is that the isomorphism
$G_2(d) \cong \mathbb {Z}[\sqrt d]$
turns the matrix Fermat equation (1.1) into a Diophantine equation over
$\mathbb {Q}(\sqrt d)$
, while fixing the determinant to
$l$
restricts attention to elements of norm
$l$
, where the interplay between the equation and the unit and torsion structure of the order becomes visible. This passage between matrix and scalar norm-form equations, on which both [Reference Mallick and Mishra5] and the present note rely, is already exploited by Cao and Grytczuk [Reference Cao and Grytczuk3], who proved that the classical Fermat equation
$X^n + Y^n = Z^n$
has no solutions at all in
$G_2(d, l)$
when
$d> 0$
and
$l \ne 0$
for every
$n \geqslant 2$
.
Following [Reference Mallick and Mishra5], we call a solution
$(X, Y, Z) \in G_2(d, l)^3$
of (1.1) trivial if
$X$
,
$Y$
and
$Z$
coincide up to sign, that is,
$Y = \pm X$
and
$Z = \pm X$
. Which sign patterns actually solve (1.1) depends on the parity of
$n$
: for
$n$
even, all choices of the signs give solutions, whereas for
$n$
odd, the relation
$A^n + (-A)^n = 0$
forces the only trivial solutions with
$l \ne 0$
to be
$(A, A, A)$
, together with the degenerate cancelling solution
$(A, -A, 0)$
, which has
$Z = 0$
and hence
$l = 0$
. We write
$\mathcal {T}$
for the resulting set of trivial solutions; the parity dependence of its cardinality is recorded explicitly in Corollary 3.2. For every
$n> 2$
, [Reference Mallick and Mishra5, Theorem 1.3] asserts that every solution of (1.1) in
$G_2(d, l)$
is trivial.
This note has three goals. First, we observe that the assertion of [Reference Mallick and Mishra5, Theorem 1.3] fails for two infinite families of
$(d, n)$
, namely
$d = -1$
with
$4 \mid n$
and
$d = -3$
with
$3 \mid n$
. Second, we prove the sharp criterion governing failure, identify exactly which determinants
$l$
admit nontrivial solutions and count those solutions. Third, we lift the entire framework from quadratic fields to number fields of arbitrary degree via the regular representation, and prove a clean nonexistence theorem for totally real fields and even exponents.
First, we write
$K = \mathbb {Q}(\sqrt d)$
and let
$w_K := |\mu (K)|$
denote the number of roots of unity in
$K$
. For quadratic fields,
Our first result corrects [Reference Mallick and Mishra5, Theorem 1.3] by Mallick and Mishra, and pinpoints the boundary between the trivial and nontrivial regimes.
Theorem 1.1. Let
$d$
be a nonzero squarefree integer,
$n \geqslant 2$
an integer,
$l \in \mathbb {Z}$
and
$K =~\mathbb {Q}(\sqrt d)$
.
The cases where part (ii) is nonvacuous are precisely
$d = -1$
with
$4 \mid n$
(and
$w_K =~4$
) and
$d = -3$
with
$3 \mid n$
(and
$w_K = 6$
). The integers
$l$
representable as
$a^2 + b^2$
are classical and, for
$d = -3$
, the additional constraint
$4 \mid l$
has a parity interpretation. A representation
$a^2 + 3b^2 = l$
has
$a \equiv b \pmod 2$
if and only if
$4 \mid l$
, and this is precisely the condition for
$\zeta \cdot (a + b\sqrt {-3})$
to remain in
$\mathbb {Z}[\sqrt {-3}]$
for a nonreal sixth root of unity
$\zeta $
.
The passage from (1.1) to the scalar equation
$\alpha ^n + \beta ^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
over
$\mathbb {Z}[\sqrt d]$
, on which the proof in Section 2 rests, makes sense over any number field and yields a strong conclusion when
$K$
is totally real.
Theorem 1.2. Let
$K$
be a totally real number field of degree
$k \geqslant 1$
, let
$\mathcal {O} \subseteq K$
be an order and let
$\phi : \mathcal {O} \to M_k(\mathbb {Z})$
be the regular representation in any
$\mathbb {Z}$
-basis. For every even integer
$n \geqslant 2$
and every nonzero
$l \in \mathbb {Z}$
, every solution of
in the determinant-fixed class
satisfies
$X = \pm Y$
and
$X = \pm Z$
.
The remainder of the paper is organised as follows. Section 2 proves Theorem 1.1 by an argument that is in essence that of Mallick and Mishra, filling in a gap in [Reference Mallick and Mishra5] and recast to facilitate the generalisation in Section 4. Section 3 records a bijection between the solution set of (1.1) and a set of triples
$(\alpha , \zeta , \xi )$
, with explicit cardinality formulae. Section 4 proves Theorem 1.2. Section 5 collects open problems and connections.
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let
$\mathcal {O} = \mathbb {Z}[\sqrt d]$
, let
$\sigma $
denote the nontrivial element of
$\mathrm {Gal}(K / \mathbb {Q})$
and define the regular representation
which encodes multiplication on
$\mathcal {O}$
in the basis
$(1, \sqrt d)$
. Then,
$\phi $
is an injective ring homomorphism with
$\det \phi (\alpha ) = N(\alpha ) := \alpha \sigma (\alpha )$
, and
$\phi $
restricts to a bijection between
$\{\alpha \in \mathcal {O} : N(\alpha ) = l\}$
and
$G_2(d, l)$
.
Proof of part (i).
Suppose
$(X, Y, Z) \in G_2(d, l)^3$
is a solution of (1.1). Write
${X = \phi (\alpha )}$
,
$Y = \phi (\beta )$
,
$Z = \phi (\gamma )$
with
$N(\alpha ) = N(\beta ) = N(\gamma ) = l$
. Applying
$\phi ^{-1}$
,
If
$l = 0$
, then
$a^2 = d b^2$
with
$d$
squarefree forces
$a = b = 0$
, so
$G_2(d, 0) = \{0\}$
and the only solution is the zero solution, which is trivial. Assume henceforth
$l \ne 0$
, so
$\alpha , \beta , \gamma $
are nonzero.
Apply
$\sigma $
to (2.1) and multiply the resulting equation and (2.1):
Expanding and using
$\alpha \,\sigma \alpha = \beta \,\sigma \beta = l$
,
Set
$u := \alpha \, \sigma \beta $
. Then,
$\beta \, \sigma \alpha = \sigma (u)$
and
$u \, \sigma (u) = N(\alpha ) N(\beta ) = l^2$
, so
$\sigma (u) = l^2 / u$
. Substituting,
Hence,
$u^n = l^n$
. Dividing by
$(\alpha \, \sigma \alpha )^n = l^n$
and applying
$\sigma $
,
Therefore,
$\zeta := \beta / \alpha $
lies in
$K \cap \mu _n = \mu _{\gcd (n, w_K)}$
, the largest subgroup of
$\mu _n$
contained in
$K$
. Substituting
$\beta = \zeta \alpha $
into (2.1) and using
$\zeta ^n = 1$
gives
$2 \alpha ^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
, whence
$\xi := \gamma / \alpha $
also lies in
$\mu _{\gcd (n, w_K)}$
.
The solution is trivial precisely when
$(\zeta , \xi ) \in \{\pm 1\}^2$
. If
$\gcd (n, w_K) \leqslant 2$
, then
$\mu _{\gcd (n, w_K)} \subseteq \{\pm 1\}$
and every solution is trivial. This proves part (i).
Proof of part (ii).
Suppose
$\gcd (n, w_K)> 2$
. Then,
$w_K \in \{4, 6\}$
, so
$K \in \{\mathbb {Q}(i), \mathbb {Q}(\sqrt {-3})\}$
and there exists
$\xi \in \mu (K) \cap \mu _n$
with
$\xi \notin \{\pm 1\}$
.
Case
$d = -1$
. Here,
$\mathcal {O} = \mathbb {Z}[i] = \mathcal {O}_K$
, so
$\mu (K) = \{\pm 1, \pm i\} \subset \mathcal {O}$
. For any
$\alpha \in \mathcal {O}$
with
$N(\alpha ) =~l$
(which exists if and only if
$G_2(-1, l) \ne \emptyset $
, that is,
$l$
is a sum of two squares), the triple
$(\alpha , \alpha , \xi \alpha )$
satisfies
$\alpha ^n + \alpha ^n = 2 (\xi \alpha )^n$
and lifts via
$\phi $
to a nontrivial solution in
$G_2(-1, l)^3$
.
Case
$d = -3$
. Here,
$\mathcal {O} = \mathbb {Z}[\sqrt {-3}] \subsetneq \mathcal {O}_K = \mathbb {Z}[\zeta _6]$
of index
$2$
. For
$\alpha = a + b \sqrt {-3} \in \mathcal {O}$
, a short calculation yields
$\zeta _6 \alpha = \tfrac {1}{2}((a - 3 b) + (a + b) \sqrt {-3})$
, which lies in
$\mathcal {O}$
if and only if
$a \equiv b \pmod 2$
. Since
$a^2 + 3 b^2 \equiv 0 \pmod 4$
if and only if
$a \equiv b \pmod 2$
, the condition
$\zeta _6 \alpha \in \mathcal {O}$
is equivalent to
$4 \mid N(\alpha ) = l$
.
If
$4 \mid l$
and
$G_2(-3, l) \ne \emptyset $
, pick any
$\alpha \in \mathcal {O}$
with
$N(\alpha ) = l$
(necessarily satisfying
$a \equiv ~b \pmod 2$
). Then,
$\xi \alpha \in \mathcal {O}$
for every
$\xi \in \mu (K)$
and the triple
$(\alpha , \alpha , \xi \alpha )$
lifts to a nontrivial solution in
$G_2(-3, l)^3$
.
If
$4 \nmid l$
, then every
$\alpha \in \mathcal {O}$
with
$N(\alpha ) = l$
has
$a \not \equiv b \pmod 2$
and for
$\xi \in \mu (K) \setminus \{\pm 1\}$
, one checks
$\xi \alpha \notin \mathcal {O}$
. Hence, no
$(\zeta , \xi ) \in \mu (K)^2 \setminus \{\pm 1\}^2$
produces a valid triple and every solution is trivial.
3 Solution counts
The proof of Theorem 1.1 extracts more than nontriviality; it yields a complete description of the solution set as a fibre product over
$\mathcal {O}$
.
Proposition 3.1. Fix
$d$
a nonzero squarefree integer,
$l \in \mathbb {Z} \setminus \{0\}$
and
$n \geqslant 2$
. Set
$\mathcal {O} =~\mathbb {Z}[\sqrt d]$
. The map
$(\alpha , \zeta , \xi ) \mapsto (\phi (\alpha ), \phi (\zeta \alpha ), \phi (\xi \alpha ))$
is a bijection between
and the set of ordered solutions of (1.1) in
$G_2(d, l)^3$
.
Proof. Surjectivity is the content of the proof of Theorem 1.1. Injectivity follows from the injectivity of
$\phi $
, together with the fact that
$\alpha \ne 0$
recovers
$\zeta = \phi ^{-1}(Y) / \phi ^{-1}(X)$
and
$\xi = \phi ^{-1}(Z) / \phi ^{-1}(X)$
uniquely.
For
$d \notin \{-1, -3\}$
,
$\mu _n \cap K = \{\pm 1\}$
and the bijection collapses to the trivial set
$\mathcal {T}$
. The nontrivial cases yield exact counts. For a positive integer
$l$
, let
Corollary 3.2. Let
$S(d, l, n)$
denote the number of ordered solutions of (1.1) in
$G_2(d, l)^3$
.
-
(a) If $K = \mathbb {Q}(i)$
and
$4 \mid n$
, then
$S(-1, l, n) = 16 \, r_{-1}(l)$
, of which
$4 \, r_{-1}(l)$
are trivial. -
(b) If $K = \mathbb {Q}(\sqrt {-3})$
,
$3 \mid n$
and
$4 \mid l$
, then
$S(-3, l, n) = m^2 \, r_{-3}(l)$
, where
$m = \gcd (n, 6) \in \{3, 6\}$
. The trivial subset has cardinality
$r_{-3}(l)$
if
$n$
is odd and
$4 r_{-3}(l)$
if
$n$
is even. -
(c) In all other cases with $\gcd (n, w_K) \leqslant 2$
,
$S(d, l, n)$
equals the cardinality of
$\mathcal {T} \cap ~G_2(d, l)^3$
, namely,
$r_d(l)$
if
$n$
is odd and
$4 r_d(l)$
if
$n$
is even.
The asymmetry in trivial counts between odd and even
$n$
is because, for
$n$
odd and
$\alpha \ne 0$
, the equation
$\alpha ^n + (-\alpha )^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
reduces to
$0 = 2 \gamma ^n$
, forcing
$\gamma = 0$
and hence
$l = 0$
. Thus, only
$(\zeta , \xi ) = (1, 1)$
yields a triple in
$\mathcal {T}$
when
$n$
is odd.
4 Proof of Theorem 1.2
Let
$K$
be a totally real number field of degree
$k$
, with embeddings
$\sigma _1, \ldots , \sigma _k$
mapping
$K \hookrightarrow \mathbb {R}$
. Let
$\mathcal {O} \subseteq K$
be an order,
$B = (e_1, \ldots , e_k)$
a
$\mathbb {Z}$
-basis and
$\phi : \mathcal {O} \to ~M_k(\mathbb {Z})$
the regular representation in basis
$B$
. As in the quadratic case,
$\phi $
is an injective ring homomorphism with
$\det \phi (\alpha ) = N_{K/\mathbb {Q}}(\alpha ) = \prod _{i=1}^k \sigma _i(\alpha )$
, and
$\phi $
restricts to a bijection between
$\{\alpha \in \mathcal {O} : N(\alpha ) = l\}$
and
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}, l)$
.
Suppose
$(X, Y, Z) = (\phi (\alpha ), \phi (\beta ), \phi (\gamma ))$
is a solution of (1.1) in
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}, l)^3$
with
$l \ne ~0$
. Then,
$\alpha , \beta , \gamma $
are nonzero elements of
$\mathcal {O}$
with
$\alpha ^n + \beta ^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
and
$N(\alpha ) = N(\beta ) = N(\gamma ) =~l$
.
Take the product of the conjugate equations
$\sigma _i(\alpha )^n + \sigma _i(\beta )^n = 2 \sigma _i(\gamma )^n$
over
$i =1, \ldots , k$
:
Factor out
$\prod _i \sigma _i(\beta )^n = N(\beta )^n = l^n$
on the left and set
$\zeta := \alpha / \beta \in K^\times $
, so that
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) =~\sigma _i(\alpha ) / \sigma _i(\beta )$
. Then,
Furthermore,
$N(\zeta ) = N(\alpha ) / N(\beta ) = 1$
, so
Set
$t_i := \sigma _i(\zeta )^n$
. Since
$K$
is totally real,
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) \in \mathbb {R}^\times $
. Since
$n$
is even,
$t_i = \sigma _i(\zeta )^n> 0$
. By the AM-GM inequality,
$1 + t_i \geqslant 2 \sqrt {t_i}$
for every
$i$
, with equality if and only if
$t_i = 1$
. Taking the product over
$i$
and using (4.2),
Equality in (4.1) forces equality in each AM-GM step; hence,
$t_i = 1$
for every
$i$
, that is,
$\sigma _i(\zeta )^n = 1$
for every embedding
$\sigma _i$
.
Since
$\sigma _i(\zeta )^n = 1$
for every embedding
$\sigma _i$
and the
$\sigma _i$
are injective,
$\zeta ^n = 1$
. Since
$\zeta \in K$
and
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) \in \mathbb {R}$
with
$\sigma _i(\zeta )^n = 1$
and
$n$
even,
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) \in \{\pm 1\}$
. As
$K$
is totally real,
$\mu (K) \subseteq \{\pm 1\}$
, so
$\zeta = \pm 1$
, that is,
$\alpha = \pm \beta $
.
Substituting
$\beta = \pm \alpha $
into
$\alpha ^n + \beta ^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
and using
$n$
even gives
$2 \alpha ^n = 2 \gamma ^n$
; hence,
$(\gamma / \alpha )^n = 1$
and by the same argument,
$\gamma = \pm \alpha $
. Therefore,
$(X, Y, Z) = (\phi (\alpha ), \pm \phi (\alpha ), \pm \phi (\alpha ))$
, which lies in the trivial set
$\mathcal {T}$
.
For
$k = 1$
, we have
$\mathcal {O} = \mathbb {Z}$
and
$G_\phi (\mathbb {Z}, l) = \{l\}$
is a singleton: the only element is
$\phi (l) = l$
itself, giving the unique triple is
$(l, l, l)$
, which is trivially a solution. No nontrivial arithmetic content arises in this case; the theorem is vacuous for
$k = 1$
and its substance lies entirely in
$k \geqslant 2$
. In particular, Theorem 1.2 should not be read as asserting anything about the unconstrained integer equation
$x^n + y^n = 2z^n$
, which for
$n = 2$
has infinitely many nontrivial solutions. Indeed,
$x^2 + y^2 = 2z^2$
has infinitely many integer solutions with
$y = 1$
, since these come from the Pell equation
$x^2 - 2z^2 = -1$
, whose solutions
$(x, z) = (1, 1), (7, 5), (41, 29), \ldots $
are infinite in number (giving
$7^2 + 1^2 = 2 \cdot 5^2$
,
$41^2 + 1^2 = 2 \cdot 29^2$
, and so on).
Remark 4.1. The hypothesis
$n$
even is used twice in the proof: to make
$t_i = \sigma _i(\zeta )^n> 0$
for the AM-GM inequality and to ensure
$-1 \in \mu _n$
so that the conclusion
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) \in \{\pm 1\}$
allows
$\zeta = -1$
. The first use is critical; the second is cosmetic. For odd
$n \geqslant 3$
and
$k \geqslant 3$
, the relation (4.1) together with (4.2) admits algebraic solutions with some
$t_i < 0$
and we do not know whether such solutions occur for genuine units of totally real cubic or higher-degree fields.
5 Further research
The arguments above settle (1.1) completely in the matrix classes of quadratic fields and in those of totally real fields for even
$n$
, leaving the following questions natural and, to our knowledge, open.
Question 5.1. Let
$K$
be a totally real number field of degree
$k \geqslant 3$
and
$n \geqslant 3$
an odd integer. Does the equation
$X^n + Y^n = 2 Z^n$
admit only trivial solutions in
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}_K, l)$
for every
$l$
?
After the reduction of Section 4, Question 5.1 is equivalent to asking whether a unit
$\zeta \in \mathcal {O}_K^\times $
with
$N(\zeta ) = 1$
,
$\zeta \ne 1$
, can satisfy
The following partial result narrows the search significantly.
Proposition 5.2. Let
$K$
be a totally real number field of degree
$k$
,
$n \geqslant 1$
an integer, and
$\zeta \in K^\times $
a totally positive element with
$N_{K/\mathbb {Q}}(\zeta ) = 1$
and
$\zeta \ne 1$
. Then,
In particular, no totally positive unit other than
$\zeta = 1$
satisfies (5.1).
Proof. For each real embedding
$\sigma _i$
,
$\sigma _i(\zeta )> 0$
and the AM-GM inequality gives
$\sigma _i(\zeta )^n + \sigma _i(\zeta )^{-n} \geqslant 2$
, with equality if and only if
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) = 1$
. Summing over
$i$
,
Equality holds if and only if
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) = 1$
for every
$i$
, that is,
$\zeta = 1$
. As
$\zeta \ne 1$
, the inequality is strict.
Any solution of (5.1) must therefore have
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) < 0$
for at least one embedding
$\sigma _i$
. Since
$N(\zeta ) = \prod _i \sigma _i(\zeta ) = 1> 0$
, the number of negative embeddings is even and at least two. For totally real cubic fields, this leaves exactly one possibility.
Corollary 5.3. Let
$K$
be a totally real cubic field and
$n \geqslant 3$
an odd integer. Any solution of (5.1) with
$\zeta \in \mathcal {O}_K^\times $
,
$N(\zeta ) = 1$
,
$\zeta \ne \pm 1$
, has exactly two negative real embeddings and one positive real embedding.
We have verified computationally that for the fundamental units
$\varepsilon _K$
and their powers
$\varepsilon _K^{\,j}$
for
$1 \leqslant j \leqslant 50$
in the totally real cubic fields defined by
$x^3 - 3 x - 1$
(discriminant
$81$
, the maximal real subfield of
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _9)$
) and
$x^3 + x^2 - 2 x - 1$
(discriminant
$49$
, the maximal real subfield of
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _7)$
), and for one norm-
$1$
unit per field across all irreducible totally real cubic polynomials of the form
$x^3 + b x^2 + c x - 1$
with
$|b|, |c| \leqslant 6$
, no
$\zeta $
satisfies (5.1) for odd
$n \in [3, 15]$
. We caution that a totally real cubic field has unit rank
$2$
by Dirichlet’s theorem, so the norm-
$1$
unit group is infinite; our search covers units of small height but is not exhaustive. Full details of these computations are available from the authors on request. The values of
$\operatorname {\mathrm {Tr}}(\zeta ^n) + \operatorname {\mathrm {Tr}}(\zeta ^{-n})$
in these examples grow rapidly in absolute value with
$n$
, since at least one embedding has
$|\sigma _i(\zeta )|> 1$
and dominates. We conjecture that (5.1) has no solutions in any totally real number field of degree
$\geqslant 3$
for odd
$n$
.
Question 5.4. For an imaginary quadratic extension
$L / K$
of a totally real field
$K$
(that is,
$L$
a CM field) with
$\mu (L) = \{\pm 1\}$
and every
$n \geqslant 3$
, do all solutions of (1.1) in
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}_L, l)$
remain trivial?
The analogue of (4.1) for CM fields involves complex moduli, and the AM-GM step does not transfer directly because
$\sigma _i(\zeta ) \in \mathbb {C} \setminus \mathbb {R}$
in general. The triangle inequality
$|1 + \sigma _i(\zeta )^n| \leqslant 2$
gives
$\prod _i |1 + \sigma _i(\zeta )^n| \leqslant 2^k$
with equality only when each
$\sigma _i(\zeta )^n = 1$
, but
$\prod _i (1 + \sigma _i(\zeta )^n) = 2^k$
is a stronger condition that we do not see how to exploit without additional input.
Question 5.5. For
$K$
a cyclotomic field
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _m)$
and
$\mathcal {O} \subseteq \mathcal {O}_K$
an order, characterise the pairs
$(m, n, l)$
for which (1.1) admits nontrivial solutions in
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}, l)$
.
This is the natural framework in which the exceptional pairs
$(d, n) = (-1, 4 \cdot \mathbb {N})$
and
$(-3, 3 \cdot \mathbb {N})$
of Theorem 1.1 sit: these are precisely the embeddings of
$\mathbb {Q}(\sqrt d)$
as subfields of
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _4)$
and
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _6)$
, respectively. We expect a clean answer in terms of the inclusion lattice of subfields of
$\mathbb {Q}(\zeta _m)$
.
Remark 5.6. The scalar equation
$x^n + y^n = 2 z^n$
over
$\mathbb {Q}$
has only the trivial solutions
$\pm (1, 1, 1)$
and
$\pm (1, -1, 0)$
for
$n \geqslant 3$
, established by Ribet [Reference Ribet6] for primes
$n$
, and completed by Darmon and Merel [Reference Darmon and Merel4] for all
$n \geqslant 3$
. Theorem 1.1 together with Proposition 3.1 reduces the matrix problem in
$G_2(d, l)$
to a scalar Diophantine problem in
$K$
, but with the crucial twist that the relevant scalars are not free: they live on the norm-
$l$
orbit of
$\mathcal {O}^\times $
acting on a fixed
$\alpha $
. The exceptional solutions arise from this orbit structure and are invisible to the scalar Fermat program, since they collapse to the trivial scalar solution
$\alpha = \zeta \alpha $
(with
$\zeta $
a nonreal root of unity) after taking absolute values.
Remark 5.7. The matrix class
$G_\phi (\mathcal {O}, l)$
depends on the basis
$B$
chosen, but the property of admitting nontrivial solutions of (1.1) does not: a change of
$\mathbb {Z}$
-basis of
$\mathcal {O}$
conjugates
$\phi $
by a matrix in
$GL_k(\mathbb {Z})$
, which preserves both the determinant and the relation (1.1). Thus, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are statements about the order
$\mathcal {O}$
, not about the matrix embedding.

















