Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:53:38.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of annual layer thickness model estimates with observational measurements using the Berkner Island ice core, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2017

A. Massam*
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
S.B. Sneed
Affiliation:
Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, 133 Sawyer Research Building, Orono, ME 04469-5741, USA
G.P. Lee
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
R.R. Tuckwell
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
R. Mulvaney
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
P.A. Mayewski
Affiliation:
Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, 133 Sawyer Research Building, Orono, ME 04469-5741, USA
P.L. Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model to estimate the annual layer thickness of deposited snowfall at a deep ice core site, compacted by vertical strain with respect to depth, is assessed using ultra-high-resolution laboratory analytical techniques. A recently established technique of high-resolution direct chemical analysis of ice using ultra-violet laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP-MS) has been applied to ice from the Berkner Island ice core, and compared with results from lower resolution techniques conducted on parallel sections of ice. The results from both techniques have been analysed in order to assess the capability of each technique to recover seasonal cycles from deep Antarctic ice. Results do not agree with the annual layer thickness estimates from the age–depth model for individual samples <1 m long as the model cannot reconstruct the natural variability present in annual accumulation. However, when compared with sections >4 m long, the deviation between the modelled and observational layer thicknesses is minimized to within two standard deviations. This confirms that the model is capable of successfully estimating mean annual layer thicknesses around analysed sections. Furthermore, our results confirm that the LA ICP-MS technique can reliably recover seasonal chemical profiles beyond standard analytical resolution.

Information

Type
Physical Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2017 
Figure 0

Table I Annual layer thickness determined as the mean thickness value of all layers identified in each analysed section, and the standard deviation (SD) of each set of annual layers. Modelled annual layer thickness given with model error attached. The estimated age for each sample depth is presented as estimated by the age–depth model.

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Berkner Island ice core sampled sections of ice (pink bands) across the a. isotopic and b. modelled annual layer thickness profiles.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 A 4 m section analysed by a. continuous flow analysis (CFA) and b. dielectric profiling (DEP).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 The LA ICP-MS profiles for three sections of the ice core from 454–459 m. Semi-logarithmic plots show the log(Na+) on a common depth scale with red dashed lines delineating a seasonal peak.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 The LA ICP-MS profiles for three sections of the ice core from 694–697 m. Semi-logarithmic plots show the log(Na+) on a common depth scale with red dashed lines delineating a seasonal peak. Black dashed lines indicate where no annual layers are discernible.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 The LA ICP-MS profiles for three sections of the ice core from 702–707 m. Semi-logarithmic plots show the log(Na+) on a common depth scale with red dashed lines delineating a seasonal peak.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Three sections of the ice core originating from 455–459 m analysed by ion chromatography and displayed as semi-logarithmic plots of element concentration with red dashed lines indicating annual peaks.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Comparison of parallel sections of the ice core from 456.31–456.51 m for a. dielectric profiling (DEP) data, b. nss-S profile analysed by discrete sampling, c. sodium and chloride profiles analysed by discrete sampling and d. ice analysed by LA ICP-MS with the profile smoothed to the same resolution used in the discrete sampling technique. Annual layers are indicated by grey lines.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Comparison of parallel sections of the ice core from 458.51–458.71 m for a. dielectric profiling (DEP) data, b. nss-S profile analysed by discrete sampling (red), c. sodium and chloride profiles analysed by discrete sampling and d. ice analysed by LA ICP-MS with the profile smoothed to the same resolution used in the discrete sampling technique (red). Annual layers are indicated by grey lines.

Figure 9

Fig. 9 Comparison of parallel sections of the ice core from 703.2–703.22 m for a. ice analysed by discrete sampling technique and b. ice analysed via LA ICP-MS with a smoothed profile (red). Black dashed lines indicate where no annual layers are discernible.

Figure 10

Fig. 10 Comparison of parallel sections of the ice core from 706.3–706.38 m for a. ice analysed by discrete sampling technique and b. the nss-S profile from the discrete sampling technique and c. ice analysed via LA ICP-MS with a smoothed profile (red). Black dashed lines indicate where no annual layers are discernible.

Supplementary material: PDF

Massam supplementary material

Massam supplementary material 1

Download Massam supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 473.3 KB