Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:25:36.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-description of Cirratulus dollfusi (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae), and Fauvelicirratulus as a new genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2010

Melih Ertan Çinar*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
Mary Elizabeth Petersen
Affiliation:
Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M.E. Çinar, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey email: melih.cinar@ege.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cirratulus dollfusi Fauvel, 1928 is re-described from the material from the Sea of Marmara. The specimens collected from the Sea of Marmara were compared to the holotype of the species. The species is a multitentaculate and multibranchiate cirratulid; it differs from all other known cirratulid genera in its type of chaetae and the way the multiple branchial filaments arise from the notopodia. Chaetae are of two types: numerous long, fine capillaries in both rami throughout, also 2–4 shorter, wider, finely tapering spines in noto- and neuropodia. There are no slightly flattened sigmoid spines, typical of most Cirratulus species. Very short, slender grooved tentacles arise in a small circular group on either side of chaetiger 1. Branchial filaments are multiple; they arise as 1–2 filaments from each of 4–8 raised notopodial lobes on parapodia of anterior and middle segments, with lobes fading out and fewer (holotype) or no branchiae posteriorly (our material). No other cirratulid genera appear to have straight, tapering spines plus so many fine capillaries. We propose Fauvelicirratulus gen. nov. for this species. The species seems most closely related to Cirratulus hedgpethi Hartman, 1951, from the northern Gulf of Mexico, still only known from the incomplete original description. Features of some cirratulid genera are compared and the use of multiple branchiae as a generic character is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the investigated area with the location of sampling sites.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Fauvelicirratulus dollfusi. (A) Dorsal view of whole body (ESFM-POL/92-34); (B) dorsal view of anterior segments; (C) ventral view of anterior segments; (D) tentacular filaments; (E) branchiae on chaetigers 25 and 26. Scale bar A = 4.3 mm, B and C = 1.1 mm, D = 0.9 mm, E = 0.6 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Fauvelicirratulus dollfusi. (A) Dorsal view of anterior segments (ESFM-POL/92-34); (B) lateral view of parapodium on chaetiger 8 (chaetae omitted); (C) dorsal view of parapodia on chaetigers 3 and 4; (D) posterior view of parapodium on chaetiger 30 (chaetae omitted); (E) posterior view of parapodium on chaetiger 119 (chaetae omitted); (F) dorsal view of posterior end and pygidium; (G) spine on neuropodium of chaetiger 100. Scale bar A = 1.8 cm, B, D and E = 0.8 mm, C = 0.6 mm, F = 0.74 mm, G = 270µm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Fauvelicirratulus dollfusi. (A) Posterior view of parapodium on chaetiger 20 (ESFM-POL/92-34); (B) posterior view of parapodium on chaetiger 100; (C) posterior view of parapodium on chaetiger 162; (D) spines on neuropodium of chaetiger 100; (E) chaetigers in middle region of the body; (F) eggs within parapodium of chaetiger 70 (mean diameter 65.8 µm); (G) a spine on neuropodium of chaetiger 100. Scale bar A = 1 mm, B = 1.65 mm, C = 0.4 mm, D = 0.52 mm, E = 1.65 cm, F = 0.58 mm, G = 150 µm.