Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:30:20.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D polarization texture of a symmetric 4-fold flux closure domain in strained ferroelectric PbTiO3 films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2016

Y.L. Tang
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Y.L. Zhu
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Z.J. Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
E.A. Eliseev
Affiliation:
Institute for Problems of Materials Science, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 03142, Ukraine
A.N. Morozovska
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 03028, Ukraine
Y.J. Wang
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Y. Liu
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Y.B. Xu
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
B. Wu
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
L.Q. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
S.J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
X.L. Ma*
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xlma@imr.ac.cn

Abstract

Although the strong coupling of polarization to spontaneous strain in ferroelectrics would impart a flux-closure with severe disclination strains, recent studies have successfully stabilized such a domain via a nano-scaled multi-layer growth. Nonetheless, the detailed distributions of polarizations in three-dimensions (3D) and how the strains inside a flux closure affect the structures of domain walls are still less understood. Here we report a 3D polarization texture of a 4-fold flux closure domain identified in tensile strained ferroelectric PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer films. Ferroelectric displacement analysis based on aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopic imaging reveals highly inhomogeneous strains with strain gradient above 107/m. These giant disclination strains significantly broaden the 90° domain walls, while the flexoelectric coupling at 180° domain wall is less affected. The present observations are helpful for understanding the basics of topological dipole textures and indicate novel applications of ferroelectrics through engineering strains.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Illustration of the heteroepitaxial SrTiO3(10 nm)/PbTiO3(36 nm)/SrTiO3(3 nm)/PbTiO3(28 nm)/GdScO3 multilayer. (a) Schematic illustration of the multilayer. (b) A low-magnification cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer. (c) A HAADF-STEM intensity profile of (b), which reveals the well-grown PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer. Since the image intensity under HAADF mode is about proportional to Z2 (Z is the atomic number), heavy cations appear as bright contrast while light ions appear as gray contrast in the HAADF, or Z-contrast images. Thus in (b) PbTiO3 crystal shows bright appearance, while the SrTiO3 layers and GdScO3 substrate exhibit darker contrast since Gd and Sr elements are much lighter than Pb.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Experimental determination of the polarization direction by the relative displacements of the Ti4+ cation columns and the Pb2+ cation columns. (a) Schematic perspective view of the unit cell of ferroelectric PbTiO3. (b) Projection of the unit-cell along the [100] direction (yellow circle: Pb2+, red circle: Ti4+ and blue circle: O2−). (c) A HAADF-STEM image of the PbTiO3 crystal. The image is recorded with the incident electron beam parallel to the [100] direction. The Pb2+ columns appear brighter than the Ti4+ columns. The red arrows in (b) and (c) denote the relative displacements of the Ti4+ columns and the Pb2+ columns, which were opposite to the spontaneous polarization direction of the PbTiO3. Yellow arrows superimposed on the right panel of (c) indicate reversed Ti4+ ion displacement (δTi) vectors, which were consistent with the spontaneous polarization direction of the PbTiO3.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. HAADF-STEM image and in-plane strain analysis of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer film. (a) A low-magnification HAADF-STEM image of the multilayer. (b) In-plane strain map extracted via GPA. Domains marked with red color have larger in-plane lattice parameter (a domain), while domains filled with green color possess smaller in-plane lattice parameter (c domain). Yellow arrows indicate possible polarization directions in corresponding domains, which will be specified in latter analysis (Figs. 4 and 5). Note that a possible 4-fold domain wall junctions displaying flux closure feature was marked by a yellow box.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. HAADF-STEM imaging of the 4-fold domain wall junctions in the PbTiO3 layer close to the 3 nm SrTiO3 layer. (a) Atomic-resolution image of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer. The Pb2+ ions appear as bright circles, the Sr2+ and Ti4+ ions show degressively changed intensities. The green dashed-lines trace the 90° domain walls. Note the curvature of the 3 nm SrTiO3 layer, which implies that the upper and lower PbTiO3 layers are strain-coupled with each other. The blue dotted-line indicates the 180° domain wall. (b) A magnification of the red box area in (a) superimposed with reversed Ti4+ ion displacement vector maps unit-cell by unit-cell. It is a quadrant head-to-tail polarization-closure domains composed of two 3-fold vertices.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. High-magnification raw image of the 4-fold domain wall junctions corresponding to Fig. 4.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Strain analysis of the 4-fold domain wall junctions in PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer. (a and b) In-plane lattice parameters and in-plane lattice rotations mappings near the 4-fold domain wall junctions. (c and d) Out-of-plane lattice parameters and out-of-plane lattice rotations mappings near the 4-fold domain wall junctions. An inset in (d) indicates the definition of in-plane and out-of-plane lattice rotation. The in-plane lattice rotation was denoted by ωx, while the out-of-plane lattice rotation was denoted by ωy. Counter-clockwise lattice rotation was defined as positive rotation, while clockwise rotation was defined as negative ones.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Lattice behavior analysis across the 180° domain wall of the 4-fold domain wall junctions. (a) In-plane lattice parameter (c lattice here) distributions. The data was acquired from the white box area in Fig. 6(a). (b) Out-of-plane lattice parameter (a lattice here) distributions. The data was acquired from the PbTiO3 unit-cells corresponding to the white box area marked in Fig. 6(a). (c) c/a ratio (tetragonality) distributions calculated based on (a) and (b). Note the giant lattice parameter gradient up to 0.018 Å per unit-cell in (a), corresponds to a strain gradient above 107/m. Also note an unusual a lattice peak in (b), which results in a nearly 1 tetragonality in (c). This unusual lattice behavior was predicted in first principle simulations for the ferroelectric vortices.12

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Phase-field simulation of domain structures in the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer under tensile strain. (a) Initial structure used for the phase-field simulation of domain structures of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 multilayer film. Small slightly polar nuclei were initiated until the stabilized domain structure obtained. (b) In-plane polarization map (X component). (c) Out-of-plane polarization map (Z component). Note that both of the 4-fold domain wall junctions and periodic array of flux-closure quadrants were well reproduced through the phase-field calculations, which are consistent with the HAADF-STEM observations (Fig. 3). The polarization of bulk PbTiO3 (about 0.75 C/m2) was normalized to ‘1’ and used for defining the color scale of Px and Pz.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Phase-field simulations of strain and polarization distributions in the 4-fold domain wall junctions. (a) In-plane lattice parameter map (X component). (b) Out-of-plane lattice parameter map (Z component). (c) Polarization vector map for the X–Z component. (d) Y component polarization map. Maps (c) and (d) correspond to the white box area marked in (b). Note that the color scales for the X and Z strain components in the ellipse areas are nearly the same, indicating a ∼1 c/a ratio occurs here, which are consistent with the STEM observations [Fig. 7(c)].

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Comparisons of Pb2+ ion offsets across the 180° domain wall in the 4-fold domain wall junctions and a 180° domain wall under no strain. These Pb2+ offsets were analyzed by the Landau–Ginsburg–Devonshire model. (a) The HAADF-STEM image of the 180° domain wall in the 4-fold domain wall junctions. (b) The distributions of Pb2+ offsets across the 180° domain wall in (a). The solid curve is the fitting result of the HAADF-STEM experiment based on (a). (c) A HAADF-STEM image of a 180° domain wall in a PbTiO3/SrTiO3(001) film. The PbTiO3 crystal here is less affected by strain since the mismatch between PbTiO3 and SrTiO3(001) substrate is tiny (<0.13%). (d) The distributions of Pb2+ offsets across the 180° domain wall in (c). The solid curve is the fitting result based on the HAADF-STEM experiment of (c). Note the obvious scattering of Pb2+ offset distributions across the 180° domain wall in the 4-fold domain wall junctions in (c). Nevertheless, the fitting results revealed that the relative Pb2+ offsets across these two 180° domain walls were basically the same, while the Pb2+ offsets for 4-fold domain wall junctions are highly asymmetric.