The purpose of this perspective is to highlight potential unintended and adverse consequences of the increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in children and adolescents. We propose a set of activities suited in particular to the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) network of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs to mitigate these possible threats to pediatric health. Our apprehension is heightened, ironically, because recent studies have corroborated in children and adolescents the remarkable effectiveness of the GLP-1RAs in the management of type 2 diabetes and, as satiety-enhancing medications, in obesity that had been previously demonstrated in adults. Two studies were published in the impactful New England Journal of Medicine [Reference Weghuber, Barrett and Barrientos-Pérez1,Reference Arslanian, Hannon and Zeitler2], research motivated, as noted by the authors, in no small measure precisely because the currently approved medications for pediatric obesity and type 2 diabetes have proven to be limited in their effectiveness and fraught with adverse events [Reference Woodard, Louque and Hsia3]. Current administration of the GLP-1RAs is predominantly parenteral, but with the progress in the development of oral formulations [Reference Saxena, Frias and Brown4], their increased use in children and adolescents, unsupervised and/or medically supervised, is inevitable. Little attention has been paid to the possible unintended consequences or adverse impact of these medications on children and adolescents during their critical period of growth and development (Table 1).

Table 1.

Possible unintended consequences of supervised or unsupervised use of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists in children and adolescents

A major element of our concern is that unbalanced and inappropriate reductions in caloric (energy) intake could be induced by GLP-1RA in children and adolescents. Energy in children and adolescents is expended not only on physical activity but also, unlike in adults, on growth and development. The balance of energy intake and energy expenditure influences growth and health across the lifespan. For example, with appropriate levels of exercise and diet during adolescence, bone mineralization is increased and the risk of osteoporosis and pathologic fractures much later in life is lessened [Reference Nguyen5]. Almost any deviation from healthy levels of physical activity and diet can adversely impact catabolic and anabolic mediators. Seemingly disparate conditions such as adolescents who are normal-weight but physically inactive [Reference Ischander, Zaldivar, Eliakim, Nussbaum, Dunton and Leu6], those who exercise at excessive levels [Reference Nemet, Connolly and Pontello-Pescatello7,Reference Javed, Tebben, Fischer and Lteif8], and obese children and adolescents [Reference Petek, Petek, Močnik and Varda9], all manifest harmful growth patterns and, often, elevated inflammation associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk.

Rapid development of oral-administration formulations of GLP-1RA and the proclivity among adolescents for risk-taking [Reference Winer, Yule, Hadland and Bagley10] create a perfect storm for potential abuse. Adolescence marks a particularly vulnerable period for the development of self-esteem and satisfaction with one’s own appearance. Lifetime prevalence data in the United States from 2010 indicated that 2.7% of adolescents manifested eating disorders at some point in their lifetime, with females being more than twice as likely as males [Reference Merikangas, He and Burstein11]. Volitional emesis and the use of laxatives or appetite suppressants are not uncommon in youth [12]. In recent years, the rapid expansion of social media has resulted in more youth being exposed to body image ideals and diet culture than ever before. Young users of social media have a higher risk of developing eating disorders [Reference Wilksch, O’Shea, Ho, Byrne and Wade13]. The potential for GLP-1RA abuse was further enhanced by the shutdowns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic that worsened the intractable epidemics of pediatric obesity and poor cardiorespiratory-metabolic fitness, particularly among minority populations of children and adolescents.

Anecdotal clinical experience of our group suggests that there is already widespread knowledge in the pediatric population about the GLP-1RA’s effectiveness as satiety medication aiding weight loss, not helped by apparent widespread use documented in the popular media [Reference Maurice14]. Health threats resulting from the explosion of counterfeit drugs are well documented [Reference Blumenberg, Hughes, Reckers, Ellison and Gerona15] and fueled in part by illegitimate access through the internet [Reference Michael White16]. We fear that children and adolescents participating in weight-sensitive activities such as wrestling, bodybuilding, cheerleading, gymnastics, or dance might be particularly vulnerable to unsupervised acquisition and use of these medications.

Adding to our concerns about potential abuse and overuse of the new GLP-1RA medications is the increasing medicalization of pediatric conditions [Reference Marty, Alvey, Mann and Murphy17], many of which result from environmental and societal rather than biological mechanisms, and the lack of progress in particular made in addressing the environmental and lifestyle issues that have contributed immeasurably to the childhood obesity epidemic. The issue of lifestyles was, in fact, highlighted in particular by Weghuber et al. cited above in their publication on semaglutide effectiveness in pediatric obesity [Reference Weghuber, Barrett and Barrientos-Pérez1]. The authors carefully adhered to the “lifestyle interventions” mandated by the FDA and its European counterpart for clinical trials of medications for type 2 diabetes and obesity in the pediatric age range [18,19]. However, the lifestyle intervention guidelines, dating back to 2007–2008, do not address the need to precisely measure dose, frequency, and type of physical activity or diet and do not suggest ways (e.g., cardiopulmonary exercise testing) other than self-report to monitor intervention compliance or fidelity.

We recognize the challenges imposed by implementing truly effective lifestyle interventions in children and adolescents who are obese or suffer from frank type 2 diabetes. By the time such children or adolescents gain access to medical intervention (which is currently limited at best) or are eligible for clinical trials, the clinical trialist and primary care provider must overcome the years of poor diet, sedentary behavior, and lack of available, safe, and supportive venues for vigorous play and exercise that for the majority of these children paved the way for their conditions. In the classic 2002 NEJM study designed to prevent the transition of pre-diabetes to frank type 2 diabetes in adults [Reference Knowler, Barrett-Connor and Fowler20], the authors concluded, “Lifestyle changes and treatment with metformin both reduced the incidence of diabetes in persons at high risk. The lifestyle intervention was more effective than metformin.” We speculate that the very fact that the lifestyle interventions in the recent pediatric study had virtually no effect suggests that their ineffectiveness resulted from insufficient implementation and not lack of biological efficacy.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of certain GLP-1RAs like liraglutide have been studied in both adult and pediatric populations [Reference Carlsson Petri, Hale, Hesse, Rathor and Mastrandrea21]; however, children are not miniature adults and as newer formulations emerge, it cannot be assumed that pharmacokinetics or adverse effects in adults are the same in children or adolescents [Reference Verscheijden, Koenderink, Johnson, de Wildt and Russel22]. We must also consider that pediatric dosage forms may be more expensive than adult formulations [23], there is a potential for lifelong reliance on these medications if started in childhood, and GLP-1RA may require lifestyle interventions [Reference Sandsdal, Juhl, Jensen, Lundgren, Janus and Blond24] to optimize safety, efficacy, and value during growth and development.

The GLP-1RA class of medications will benefit children and adolescents with morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes. We also believe that their overuse and abuse are inevitable. The NCATS emphasis on the science of translation positions the network of CTSA hubs to mitigate these potential threats to child and adolescent health. Attention to real-world data, team science, community engagement, implementation and dissemination, and health disparities will be key in formulating research and policy planning. Accordingly, we propose the following elements as a call to action for CTSA hubs across the nation:

1. 1. Build and support multidisciplinary teams of frontline clinicians, community partners, physiologists, and behavioral and pharmaceutical scientists to address the knowledge gap in GLP-1RA effects in children and adolescents (see Fig. 1).

2. 2. Address the translational bioethics research [Reference Rothstein25] issues that will result from approval of pediatric formulations of the GLP-1RA medications in particular and, in general, that have evolved from the medicalization of health conditions like pediatric obesity.

3. 3. Engage and improve the quality and accessibility of relevant real-world data such as school-based physical fitness testing (SB-PFT), mandated in sixteen states covering ∼ 60% of American school children [Reference Krochmal, Cooper, Radom-Aizik and Lu26]. SB-PFT can prove to be an enormously helpful health and fitness metric used to identify regions and communities where poor cardiorespiratory-metabolic fitness and obesity are high, and the possible need for and abuse of GLP-1RA medications are most likely.

4. 4. Work with the FDA and other agencies to update guidelines for lifestyle interventions in pediatric clinical trials that incorporate state-of-the-art approaches to quantifying, monitoring, and evaluating physical activity, adherence to diet, and accurate measurement of body composition beyond the current reliance on the body mass index, a suboptimal metric of overweight and obesity in adolescents [Reference Karchynskaya, Kopcakova and Klein27].

5. 5. Elevate and enhance training of the clinical trial workforce on state-of-the-art understanding of effective lifestyle interventions. Such training should also target primary care pediatricians whose exposure to exercise and nutritional science is currently quite limited [Reference Lu, Cooper, Dubrowski, Barwick and Radom-Aizik28].

6. 6. Develop, demonstrate, and disseminate learning modules for school personnel (teachers, coaches), parents, school-aged children, primary care pediatricians, and child mental health professionals about the GL1-RA medications, their appropriate uses, and possible abuse.

Figure 1.

Dearth of research on GLP-1 RAs in children and adolescents. The use of these medications in the pediatric age range is likely to be long term. Little is known about the long-term and lifespan effects of these drugs during critical periods of growth and development.