Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T08:29:39.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-dimensionality of elliptical cylinder wakes at low angles of incidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2017

Anirudh Rao
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 17 College Walk, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Justin S. Leontini
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia
Mark C. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 17 College Walk, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Kerry Hourigan
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 17 College Walk, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: mark.thompson@monash.edu

Abstract

The wake of an elliptical cylinder at low incident angles is investigated for different aspect ratio ( $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=\text{major:minor axis ratio}$ ) cylinders using stability analysis and direct simulations. In particular, two- and three-dimensional transitions are mapped for cylinders of aspect ratios between 1 and 4 using Floquet stability analysis. The transition scenario for near-unity aspect ratio cylinders resembles that for a circular cylinder wake as Reynolds number is increased to $Re\lesssim 400$ ; first, with the transition from steady two-dimensional flow to unsteady two-dimensional flow, followed by the onset of three-dimensional flow via a long-wavelength instability (mode A), then, a short-wavelength instability (mode B) and, finally, an intermediary wavelength instability which is quasi-periodic in nature (mode QP). The effect of the incident angle on this transition scenario for the low-aspect-ratio cylinders is minimal. As the aspect ratio is increased towards 2, two synchronous modes, modes $\widehat{\text{A}}$  and $\widehat{\text{B}}$ , become unstable; these modes have spatio-temporal symmetries similar to their circular cylinder wake counterparts, modes A and mode B, respectively. While mode $\widehat{\text{A}}$  persists for all incident angles investigated here, mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$  is found only to be unstable for incident angles up to $10^{\circ }$ . Surprisingly, for $1.8\lesssim \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\lesssim 2.9$ , the mode A instability observed at zero incident angle emerges as a quasi-periodic mode as the incident angle is increased even slightly. At higher incident angles, this quasi-periodic mode once again transforms to a real mode on increasing the Reynolds number. The parameter space maps for the various aspect ratios are presented in the Reynolds number–incident angle plane, and the three-dimensional modes are discussed in terms of similarities to and differences from existing modes. A key aim of the work is to map the different modes and various transition sequences as a simple body geometry is systematically changed and as the flow symmetry is systematically broken; thus, insight is provided on the overall path towards fully turbulent flow.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.Schematic of the elliptical cylinder in a flow at angle of incidence.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Variation of the Strouhal number, $St$, versus Reynolds number, $Re$, for (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ and (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$, for various incident angles of: $I=0^{\circ }$ (●), $I=4^{\circ }$ (○), $I=8^{\circ }$ (▫), $I=12^{\circ }$ (▪), $I=16^{\circ }$ (▵) and $I=20^{\circ }$ (▴). The shedding frequency decreases with an increase in the angle of incidence. The dashed red line approximately marks the critical Reynolds number for the transition to three-dimensional flow.

Figure 2

Figure 3.(a) Marginal stability diagram of the $Re-I$ parameter space showing the various transitions for $Re\leqslant 440,I\leqslant 20^{\circ }$ for the elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.1$. (b) Regions of steady flow and three-dimensional instabilities – (c) mode A, (d) mode B and (e) mode QP are each assigned a unique colour and overlaying these regions gives the composite image in (a).

Figure 3

Figure 4.(a) Marginal stability diagram of the $Re-I$ parameter space showing the various transitions for $Re\leqslant 440,I\leqslant 20^{\circ }$ for the elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5$. (b) Regions of steady flow and three-dimensional instabilities: (c) mode A, (d) mode $\widehat{\text{A}}$, (e) mode B, (f) mode QP and (g) mode C are each assigned a unique colour and overlaying these regions gives the composite image in (a).

Figure 4

Figure 5.(a) Marginal stability diagram of the $Re-I$ parameter space showing the various transitions for $Re\leqslant 440,I\leqslant 20^{\circ }$ for the elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$. Regions of three-dimensional instabilities – (b) mode QPA, (c) mode $\widehat{\text{A}}$, (d) mode B, (e) mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$, (f) mode C and (g) mode QP are each assigned a unique colour and overlaying these regions gives the composite image in (a). The dashed line of mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ indicates the extrapolated values at lower angles of incidence.

Figure 5

Figure 6.Visualisation of spanwise perturbation vorticity contours for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ at the specified parameter values, and in the increasing order of their characteristic spanwise wavelengths, for (a) mode B: $Re=400,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=0.85$, (b) mode QP: $Re=400,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=1.9$, (c) mode C: $I=20^{\circ },Re=360,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=2.1$, (d) mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$: $Re=320,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=2.5$, (e) mode QPA: $Re=320,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4$ and (f) mode $\widehat{\text{A}}$: $Re=320,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=8$. Spanwise perturbation vorticity contour levels are between $\pm 0.1D/U$ and are overlaid by dashed lines (— —) that indicate the base flow vorticity contour levels between $\pm 1D/U$. Modes QPA, $\widehat{\text{A}}$ and $\widehat{\text{B}}$ have been captured at the same instant of vortex shedding at $I=8^{\circ },Re=320$; modes B and QP have been captured at the same instant of vortex shedding at $I=8^{\circ },Re=400$; mode C has been captured at $I=20^{\circ },Re=360$. Flow is from left to right in all images.

Figure 6

Figure 7.(a) Marginal stability diagram of the $Re-I$ parameter space showing the various transitions for $Re\leqslant 500,I\leqslant 20^{\circ }$ for the elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$. (b) Regions of steady flow and three-dimensional instabilities: (c) mode QPA, (d) mode $\widehat{\text{A}}$, (e) mode B, (f) mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ and (g) mode C are each assigned a unique colour and overlaying these regions gives the composite image in (a).

Figure 7

Figure 8.Variation of the critical spanwise wavelength at onset for $Re\leqslant 500$ for (a) mode A, (b) mode B, (c) mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$, (d) mode C, (e) mode QP and (f) mode QPA. The aspect ratios are assigned a specific symbol and line type; $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.1$ (●), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.8$ (▵), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ (▫), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$ (▪) and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=3$ (▴).

Figure 8

Figure 9.Locus of the Floquet multipliers on the complex plane at the specified Reynolds numbers at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$ at (a) $I=8^{\circ }$ for a spanwise wavelength of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.6$ and (b) $I=16^{\circ }$ for a spanwise wavelength of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.5$. The unit circle ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$) is shown by the curved red line. For clarity, only the positive component of the complex-conjugate pair of the multipliers is shown in these figures. Three-dimensional reconstructions of mode QPA in plan view taken at (c) $t=t_{o}$ and (d) $t=t_{o}+17T_{2D}$ at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5,I=8^{\circ },Re=400$ showing two spanwise wavelengths of the instability over a spanwise distance of $8D$. Isosurfaces of streamwise perturbation vorticity (in red and yellow) are visualised with the cylinder (in blue). Flow is from left to right in images (c,d).

Figure 9

Figure 10.Locus of the Floquet multipliers on the complex plane for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5,I=16^{\circ }$ for $Re=285$ (●) and $Re=290$ (○) at the specified values of spanwise wavelength. The unit circle ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$) is shown by the curved red line. For clarity, only the positive component of the complex-conjugate pair of the multipliers is shown in this figure. The values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D$ are shown in black and red labels for $Re=285$ and $Re=290$, respectively for (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.6$, (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.9$, (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.2$, (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.5$, (e) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.8$ and (f) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=5.4$.

Figure 10

Figure 11.Locus of the normalised Floquet multipliers on the complex plane at the specified values for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$. The unit circle ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$) is shown by the curved red line. For clarity, only the positive component of the complex-conjugate pair of the multipliers is shown in this figure. The values chosen are close to the marginal stability curve for mode QPA: (a) $I=12^{\circ },Re=310,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.9$, (b) $I=10^{\circ },Re=330,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.6$, (c) $I=9^{\circ },Re=340,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.3$, (d) $I=8^{\circ },Re=360,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.3$, (e) $I=6^{\circ },Re=380,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.15$, (f) $I=4^{\circ },Re=400,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.0$, (g) $I=2^{\circ },Re=415,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.3$ and (h) $I=0^{\circ },Re=430,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.6$.

Figure 11

Figure 12.Visualisation of the spanwise perturbation vorticity contours in the wake of an elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$ for (a) $I=0^{\circ },Re=460,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.6$ and (b) $I=16^{\circ },Re=290,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.5$. Contour shading as per figure 6. Flow is from left to right in all images.

Figure 12

Figure 13.Variation of the Floquet multiplier with spanwise wavelength for the elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$, at $I=8^{\circ },Re=400$. The dashed line indicates neutral stability ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$). The three-dimensional modes which are unstable – modes C, $\widehat{\text{B}}$, QPA and $\widehat{\text{A}}$ are marked on this figure.

Figure 13

Figure 14.(a,b) Time histories of the streamwise and spanwise velocity components at a point in the wake ($(x,y)=(1.58,0.5)$) of an elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5,I=8^{\circ },Re=400$ for a cylinder of spanwise distance of $8D$. Visualisations of the streamwise vorticity (in red and yellow) in the wake of the cylinder (in blue) in plan view at (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=213$, (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=295$, (e) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=385$ and (f) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=426$. Flow is from left to right in images (c)–(f).

Figure 14

Figure 15.Locus of the Floquet multipliers on the complex plane for elliptical cylinders at an incident angle of $I=16^{\circ }$ for: (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.1,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=2$, (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.8,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.9$, (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.6,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.8$ and (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=3,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4.8$ at the specified Reynolds numbers. The unit circle ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$) is shown by the curved red line. For clarity, only the positive component of the complex-conjugate pair of the multipliers is shown in this figure.

Figure 15

Figure 16.(a) Variation of the magnitude of the Floquet multiplier with spanwise wavelength at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5,I=12^{\circ },Re=440$. The dashed line indicates neutral stability ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$). (b–j) Visualisation of the spanwise perturbation vorticity contours at the same instant in the vortex shedding cycle for spanwise wavelengths for (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4$, (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=5$, (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=6$, (e) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=7$, (f) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=8$, (g) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=10$, (h) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=12$, (i) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=20$ and (j) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=32$. Contour shading as per figure 6. Flow is from left to right in these images.

Figure 16

Figure 17.Unstable region of mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ in the $Re-I$ parameter space for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.8$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ (●), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$ (▫) and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=3$ (▪). The onset of mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ is delayed to higher Reynolds numbers as the aspect ratio is increased beyond $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$. The dashed line of mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ at low incident angles indicates the values have been extrapolated using the quadratic fit method employed in Leontini et al. (2015).

Figure 17

Figure 18.Contour plots of the Floquet multiplier of mode $\widehat{\text{B}}$ for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$: (a) as a $f(Re,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant incident angle of $I=8^{\circ }$ and (b) as a $f(I,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant Reynolds number of $Re=360$. Contour lines in (a) are at $|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1.075$ (thin dashed lines), $1$ (continuous line) and $0.925$ (thick dashed lines). Contour lines in (b) are at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}=1.15$ (thin dashed lines), $1$ (continuous line) and $0.9$ (thick dashed lines).

Figure 18

Figure 19.Contour plots of the Floquet multipliers for mode QP and mode C for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5$: (a) as a $f(Re,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant incident angle at $I=16^{\circ }$ and (b) as a $f(I,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant Reynolds number of $Re=380$. Contour lines in (a) are at $|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1.3$ (thin dashed lines), $1.15$ (continuous line) and $1$ (thick dashed lines) and in (b) are at $|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1.4$ (thin dashed lines), $1.25$ (continuous line) and $1.1$ (thick dashed lines).

Figure 19

Figure 20.Locus of the Floquet multipliers on the complex plane for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5,I=16^{\circ }$ at the specified Reynolds numbers for spanwise wavelengths of (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=1.9$ and (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=2.15$. The unit circle ($|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1$) is shown by the curved red line. For clarity, only the positive component of the complex-conjugate pair of the multipliers is shown in this figure.

Figure 20

Figure 21.Variation of the dominant spanwise wavelength of mode C (●) and mode QP (▫, ▪) at $I=18^{\circ }$ for (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5$, (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ and (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5,I=22^{\circ }$. Open symbols indicate values when the mode is stable to perturbations ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}<1$), while filled symbols indicate values where Floquet multipliers are unstable ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}\geqslant 1$). Lines are best fits to the measured values.

Figure 21

Figure 22.Contour plots of the Floquet multiplier of mode C for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$: (a) as a $f(Re,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant incident angle of $I=8^{\circ }$ and (b) as a $f(I,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D)$ at a constant Reynolds number of $Re=400$. Contour lines in (ab) are at $|\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}|=1.02$ (thin dashed lines), $0.96$ (continuous line) and $0.9$ (thick dashed lines).

Figure 22

Figure 23.(a) Marginal stability diagrams of the mode E instability showing the variation of the critical Reynolds number (●), spanwise wavelength (○) and the critical Reynolds number for the onset of unsteady flow (▫) with varying aspect ratios at $I=0^{\circ }$. (b) The variation of the critical Reynolds number with angle of incidence is shown for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.1$ (●), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.5$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$ (▫) and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$ (▪). The critical Reynolds number for the onset of this mode decreases to lower values as the angle of incidence is increased. (c) Variation of the critical spanwise wavelength of the mode E instability at onset with angle of incidence for the aspect ratios in (b). Lines are best fits to the measured values. Plots reproduced from figures 3 and 4 of Rao et al. (2016).

Figure 23

Figure 24.Visualisation of the spanwise perturbation vorticity contours for the mode E instability in the wake of an elliptical cylinder for (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.2,I=0^{\circ },Re=110,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=6$, (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=4,I=0^{\circ },Re=280,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=4$, (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2,I=4^{\circ },Re=140,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=5$ and (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2,I=20^{\circ },Re=110,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=6.5$. Contour shading as per figure 6. Flow is from left to right in these images. Images reproduced from figures 3 and 4 of Rao et al. (2016).

Figure 24

Figure 25.(a,b) Time histories of the streamwise and spanwise velocity components at a point in the wake ($(x,y)=(1.76,1.76)$) of an elliptical cylinder of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=1.6,I=0^{\circ },Re=300$ for a cylinder of spanwise distance of $16D$. Visualisations of the streamwise vorticity (in red and yellow) in the wake of the elliptic cylinder (in blue) in plan view at (c) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=103$, (d) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=172$, (e) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=257$ and (f) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=261$. Flow is from left to right in images (c–f).

Figure 25

Figure 26.Visualisations of the streamwise vorticity (in red and yellow) in the wake of the elliptic cylinder (in blue) in plan view at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2,I=12^{\circ },Re=320$ for a cylinder of spanwise distance of $16D$, at (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=276$ and (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=1903$. Flow is from left to right in these images.

Figure 26

Figure 27.Visualisations of the streamwise vorticity (in red and yellow) in the wake of the elliptic cylinder (in blue) in plan view at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.25,I=0^{\circ }$ for a cylinder of spanwise distance of $16D$, at (a) $Re=300,\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=618$, (b) $Re=320,\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=649$ and (c) $Re=320,\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}=1079$. Flow is from left to right in these images.

Figure 27

Table 1.Summary of the three-dimensional modes showing the characteristic wavelength at onset, nature of the Floquet multiplier ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}$), the periodicity of the two-dimensional base flow and the spatial symmetries of these modes with respect to the streamwise velocity, $u$.

Figure 28

Table 2.Variation of time-averaged drag coefficient ($\overline{C_{d}}$), root mean square of the lift coefficient ($C_{l,RMS}$) and Strouhal number ($St$) with the specified domain sizes at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2$, $I=0^{\circ },Re=440$.

Figure 29

Table 3.Variation of time-averaged drag coefficient ($\overline{C_{d}}$), root mean square of the lift coefficient ($C_{l,RMS}$) and Strouhal number ($St$) with spatial resolution ($N$) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$,$I=0^{\circ },Re=500$. A resolution of $N=8$ was chosen for the computations and it is within 0.6 % of the maximum tested value at $N=11$.

Figure 30

Table 4.Variation of time-averaged drag coefficient ($\overline{C_{d}}$), root mean square of the lift coefficient ($\overline{C_{l}}$) and Strouhal number ($St$) with spatial resolution ($N$) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$,$I=10^{\circ },Re=500$. A resolution of $N=8$ was chosen for the computations and it is within 0.5 % of the maximum tested value at $N=11$.

Figure 31

Table 5.Variation of time-averaged drag coefficient ($\overline{C_{d}}$), root mean square of the lift coefficient ($\overline{C_{l}}$) and Strouhal number ($St$) with spatial resolution ($N$) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$,$I=20^{\circ },Re=500$. A resolution of $N=8$ was chosen for the computations and it is within 0.6 % of the maximum tested value at $N=11$.

Figure 32

Table 6.Variation of Real (Re($\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}$)) and imaginary components ($\text{Im}g(\unicode[STIX]{x1D707})$) of the Floquet multiplier with spatial resolution ($N$) for mode QPA at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2.5$, $I=16^{\circ }$, $Re=260$,$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=3.9$. A resolution of $N=8$ was chosen for the computations and it is within 0.007 % of the maximum tested value at $N=10$.

Figure 33

Table 7.Variation of magnitude of the Floquet multiplier with spatial resolution for mode C at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}=2,I=20^{\circ },Re=400,\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}/D=2.5$. A resolution of $N=8$ was chosen for the computations and it is within 0.22 % of the maximum tested value at $N=11$.