Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T04:46:07.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the Deformation of Ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

J. W. Glen*
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes compression tests at −1.5° C. on blocks of ice containing many small crystals in random orientation. Results show that ice does not possess a constant coefficient of viscosity, but obeys a more complicated relation between compressive stress u and strain rate . For the stress range 1.5–10 Kg. cm−2 this relation is approximately of the form , where n is a constant equal to about 4. A method of preparing small cylindrical single crystals of ice of a desired orientation is also described.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Es werden Kompressionsexperimente an Eisproben beschrieben, die aus vielen kleinen Kristallen in ungeordneter Orientierung bestehen. Die Resultate bei −1.5° zeigen, dass Eis keine konstante Zähigkeit besitzt, and dass der Zusammenhang zwischen dem Druck σ and der Verformungsgeschwindigkeit ziemlich kompliziert ist. Für den Druckbereich 1.5–10 Kg. cm.–2 gehorcht die Verformungsgeschwindigkeit der Gleichung wobei n konstant bleibt and einen Wert von ungefähr 4 hat. Es wird auch eine Methode zur Züchtung kleiner zylindrischer Einkristalle von Eis in beliebiger Achsenorientierung beschrieben.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1952
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Single crystal of ice, initially 25.4 mm. between grips, 13 mm.2 cross-section, optic axis at 45° to cylinder axis. Pulled with load of 400 gms. The diagram below shows schematically the initial and final states of the crystal supposing slip to have taken place on the basal plane

Figure 1

Fig. 2A typical creep curve. Specimen No. VIII, length 10.2 cm., diameter 4.63 cm., load 48 kg. After 60 hours the curve is effectively a straight line

Figure 2

Fig. 3The variation of the steady state creep rate with stress. Two points had to be omitted at 9.4 bars a strain rate of 128.4 years−1 and at 10.5 bars a strain rate of 87 years−1. The line is the straight line from Fig. 4

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Double logarithmic plot of the data in Fig. 3. The straight line corresponds to the relation, where is the strain rate in years−1 and a the stress in bars