Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:39:58.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in 2-1-1 Calls During Public Health Emergencies, Overall and By Gender: Hurricane Irma and COVID-19 in Broward County, Florida

Part of:Hurricanes Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2023

Rachel K. LandisOpen the ORCID record for Rachel K. Landis[Opens in a new window],
Shira H. FischerOpen the ORCID record for Shira H. Fischer[Opens in a new window],
Joie AcostaOpen the ORCID record for Joie Acosta[Opens in a new window] and
Laura J. Faherty
Rachel K. Landis*
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
Shira H. Fischer
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Joie Acosta
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
Laura J. Faherty
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USADepartment of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
*
Corresponding author: Rachel K. Landis; Email: rlandis@rand.org.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trends in 2-1-1 calls reflect evolving community needs during public health emergencies (PHEs). The study examined how changes in 2-1-1 call volume after 2 PHEs (Hurricane Irma and the coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] pandemic declaration) in Broward County, Florida, varied by PHE type and whether variations differed by gender and over time. Examining 2-1-1 calls during June to December 2016, June to December 2017, and March 2019 to April 2021, this study measured changes in call volume post-PHEs using interrupted time series analysis. Hurricane Irma and the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with increases in call volume (+81 calls/d and +84 calls/d, respectively). Stratified by gender, these PHEs were associated with larger absolute increases for women (+66 and +57 calls/d vs +15 and +27 calls/d for men) but larger percent increases above their baseline for men (+143% and +174% vs +119% and +138% for women). Calls by women remained elevated longer after Hurricane Irma (5 wk vs 1 wk), but the opposite pattern was observed after the pandemic declaration (8 vs 21 wk). PHEs reduce gender differences in help-seeking around health-related social needs. Findings demonstrate the utility of 2-1-1 call data for monitoring and responding to evolving community needs in the PHE context.

Keywords

2-1-1coronavirusCOVID-19pandemichurricanepopulation healthpopulation health surveillancepublic health emergencies

Information

Type
Research Letters
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023, e412
Copyright
© RAND Corporation, 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Across the United States, 2-1-1 call centers answer 20 million calls annually, providing information and referrals to community resources to address health-related social needs 1 such as food insecurity, Reference Sharareh, Hess and Wan2 childcare, and unstable housing as well as assistance with behavioral health concerns. 3 This resource may be particularly important during public health emergencies (PHEs), including for vulnerable populations most likely to call 2-1-1 for help. Reference Bame, Parker and Lee4

PHEs have immediate and lasting impacts on communities, and 2-1-1 call volume reflects both the level and duration of unmet need for services during PHEs. Reference Markhvida, Walsh and Hallegatte5–Reference Bolin and Race7 Calls to 2-1-1 surged during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in Texas in 2005, Reference Bame, Parker and Lee4 and 2-1-1 calls have been shown to be a marker of increased social needs in the first months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Reference Kreuter, Garg and Javed8 For example, calls to 2-1-1 for assistance with mental health and food insecurity markedly increased early in the pandemic. Reference Brülhart, Klotzbücher and Lalive9,Reference Udaiyar, Garg and Golla10 However, prior research has not compared the magnitude and duration of changes in 2-1-1 call volume surrounding different PHE types in the same jurisdiction, nor examined gender-specific trends.

To better understand the utility of 2-1-1 data for monitoring and responding to health-related social needs during different PHE types, this study examined the relationship between 2-1-1 call volume in Broward County, Florida, and Hurricane Irma in September 2017 and the COVID-19 pandemic declaration in March 2020, overall and by gender.

Methods

This study analyzed 2-1-1 call data from Broward County, Florida. Hurricane Irma was declared a major disaster on September 10, 2017. Data for the 7 mo surrounding this PHE (June to December 2017) and for the same period 1 y earlier were analyzed. COVID-19 was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, and data for the years prior and following this declaration were analyzed (ie, March 2019 to April 2021).

A single-group, linear interrupted time series (ITS) analysis with Newey-West standard errors was used to assess, overall and by gender, changes in daily call volume in response to 2 PHEs and the duration of these changes. Because 2-1-1 calls exhibited strong weekly patterns, the analysis controlled for day-of-the-week effects and allowed for up to 7-d lags in the autocorrelation structure. To assess percent change in call volume by gender, this study compared post-PHE peak call volume with pre-PHE average call volume for men and women. All P values were from 2-sided tests, and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0 (College Station, Texas). The RAND institutional review board deemed this study exempt.

Results

Hurricane Irma

A total of 275,856 calls to 2-1-1 were made during the time periods of interest. Average weekly call volume was 1591 calls (range: 866 to 2733). Women made 73% of calls.

Hurricane Irma was associated with a significant increase in call volume, lasting approximately 4 wk (Supplemental Figure S1). After Hurricane Irma, calls per day increased by 80.9 calls (95% CI 39.7 to 122.1, representing a 32% increase in calls per day from the pre-PHE average) and returned to prehurricane levels in early October 2017. Differences by gender were found. Call volume for women increased by 65.7 calls (33% increase) and returned to baseline after 5 wk (Figure 1A). For men, call volume increased by 15.4 calls (28% increase) and returned to baseline after 1 wk (Figure 1B). Although the absolute increase in call volume was larger for women (65.7 vs 15.4 calls), the percent change from pre-PHE average to post-PHE peak was larger for men (143% vs 119%).

Figure 1.

Observed versus predicted daily 2-1-1 call volume for women versus men before and after Hurricane Irma, Broward County, Florida, June to December 2017.

COVID-19

The pandemic declaration was also associated with a significant increase in 2-1-1 call volume, lasting approximately 10 wk (Supplemental Figure S2), (+84.4 calls; 95% confidence interval [CI] 64.0 to 104.9, representing a 45% increase in calls per day from the pre-PHE average). For women, call volume increased by 57.1 calls (42% increase) and returned to prehurricane levels after 8 wk (Figure 2A). For men, call volume increased by 27.0 calls (53% increase) and returned to baseline after 21 wk (Figure 2B). As with Hurricane Irma, the absolute change was larger for women (57.1 vs 27.0 calls), but the percent change in call volume was larger for men (174% vs 138%).

Figure 2.

Observed versus predicted daily 2-1-1 call volume for women versus men before and after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration, Broward County, Florida, March 2019 to April 2021.

Discussion

Using a rigorous, quasi-experimental causal inference design, this study found that in Broward County, Florida, 2-1-1 call volume increased significantly after Hurricane Irma and the COVID-19 pandemic declaration. Call volume was higher after the hurricane than the pandemic declaration but returned to baseline more quickly. Calls by women remained elevated longer than calls by men after Hurricane Irma, but the opposite pattern was observed after the pandemic declaration. Furthermore, the percent change in 2-1-1 calls for men was greater than for women with both PHE types.

The duration of elevated call volumes is consistent with expected patterns given the PHE types. Hurricanes are acute emergencies, causing flooding, power outages, and structural damage. As recovery efforts progress, communities likely have fewer unmet needs. In contrast, the pandemic had both immediate impacts from business closures and stay-at-home orders, Reference Killgore, Cloonan and Taylor11 as well as long-term impacts from economic and social disruption. Thus, increases in health-related social needs have persisted despite federal, state, and local recovery efforts.

This study demonstrated the utility of monitoring 2-1-1 call data during and after PHEs, as information about the magnitude and duration of significantly increased call volume can inform disaster planning and recovery efforts, including resource allocation, targeted outreach, and expanded services. The COVID-19 pandemic reversed the usual gender distribution of calls for assistance to 2-1-1, highlighting the importance of exploring PHE impacts on subgroups disproportionately affected by PHEs. With additional socio-demographic information on 2-1-1 callers (eg, age, race, ethnicity), interventions could be further tailored to address unmet needs.

Limitations

2-1-1 call data lacked information on caller race, ethnicity, and age. The reason for the call may be subject to systematic missingness and misclassification during PHEs, when call volume increases. Furthermore, increases in call volume may be affected by increased awareness of 2-1-1 if this service is advertised to communities impacted by PHEs. Finally, findings may not be generalizable to other locations or PHEs.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2023.51

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Liisa Hiatt for her assistance obtaining the data and acknowledge funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author contribution

All authors (R.K.L., S.H.F., J.A., and L.J.F.) collaborated on the conceptualization of the research; R.K.L. drafted the manuscript and conducted the analysis; S.H.F. edited the manuscript; J.A. and L.J.F. offered significant feedback on the analysis and on the manuscript.

Funding

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through work performed under contract #75D30119C06926. The study was reviewed and approved by the RAND Human Subjects Committee, IRB#2019-0920-AM03.

Competing interests

None.

References

United Way Worldwide. About 211. Published 2021. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.211.org/about-us Google Scholar
Sharareh, N, Hess, R, Wan, N, et al. Incorporation of information-seeking behavior into food insecurity research. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58(6):879-887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Way Worldwide. United Way 211. Published Undated. Accessed April 11, 2022. https://www.211.org/about-us Google Scholar
Bame, SI, Parker, K, Lee, JY, et al. Monitoring unmet needs: using 2-1-1 during natural disasters. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6 Suppl 5):S435-442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markhvida, M, Walsh, B, Hallegatte, S, et al. Quantification of disaster impacts through household well-being losses. Nat Sustain. 2020;3(7):538-547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benevolenza, MA, DeRigne, L. The impact of climate change and natural disasters on vulnerable populations: a systematic review of literature. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2019;29(2):266-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, B, Race, Kurtz LC., class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, Cham; 2018:181-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuter, MW, Garg, R, Javed, I, et al. 3.5 million social needs requests during COVID-19: what can we learn from 2-1-1? Health Affairs Blog. Published August 4, 2020. Accessed March 24, 2021. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200729.432088/full/ Google Scholar
Brülhart, M, Klotzbücher, V, Lalive, R, et al. Mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic as revealed by helpline calls. Nature. 2021;600(7887):121-126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udaiyar, A, Garg, R, Golla, B, et al. What 211s and crisis hotlines tell us about community needs. 2021. Accessed April 6, 2023. https://hcrl.wustl.edu/what-211s-and-crisis-hotlines-tell-us-about-community-needs/ Google Scholar
Killgore, WDS, Cloonan, SA, Taylor, EC, et al. Loneliness: a signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1.Observed versus predicted daily 2-1-1 call volume for women versus men before and after Hurricane Irma, Broward County, Florida, June to December 2017.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Observed versus predicted daily 2-1-1 call volume for women versus men before and after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration, Broward County, Florida, March 2019 to April 2021.