Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:18:51.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SHIFTING ALLIANCES: EPICLASSIC AND EARLY POSTCLASSIC INTERACTIONS AT CERRO PORTEZUELO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

Destiny L. Crider*
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402; Luther College, 700 College Drive, Decorah, Iowa 52101-1045
*
E-mail correspondence to: Destiny.crider@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis takes a diachronic view of Epiclassic and Early Postclassic period production and consumption patterns of diagnostic pottery complexes at Cerro Portezuelo. Stylistic and chemical characterization studies indicate a dramatic shift in the directionality and participation in pottery complexes through time throughout the Basin of Mexico. In the Epiclassic period, Cerro Portezuelo was a participant in a southern basin cultural complex. Early Postclassic pottery at Cerro Portezuelo indicates full participation in the Mazapan/Tollan pottery complex extending from Tula, through Teotihuacan, and into the southern Texcoco region. This study expands upon a previous compositional study of Cerro Portezuelo materials that indicate that Epiclassic and Early Postclassic pottery consumption was predominantly from local sources in the southeastern basin. The current study further identifies stylistic affiliations in decorated pottery types with neighboring areas within the basin and significantly increases the sample size for Epiclassic and Early Postclassic compositional data at Cerro Portezuelo.

Information

Type
Special Section: Recent Research at Cerro Portezuelo
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Basin of Mexico site locations.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Intensity of Epiclassic period occupation in study area at Cerro Portezuelo. Sherds per cubic meter fill (from Hicks 2005:Figure 2-2). The darker, smaller circles represent higher concentrations.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Intensity of Early Postclassic period occupation in the study area at Cerro Portezuelo. Sherds per cubic meter of fill (from Hicks 2005:Figure 2-3). The darker, smaller circles represent higher concentrations.

Figure 3

Table 1. Amount of pottery types by complex, counts (CT) and percentages within periods

Figure 4

Figure 4. Selected examples of Early Epiclassic pottery from Cerro Portezuelo: (a) Coyotlatelco Red-on-cream; (b–c) Heavy Line Incised & Punctate; (d) Portezuelo Grey Ware Stamped; (e and n) Composite Silhouette (Plain); (f) Portezuelo Grey Ware Incised; (g and j) Incised & Punctate Light Line; (h) Zone Incised RN; (i) Tezonchichilco RN Incised; (k–l) handled florero.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Selected examples of Epiclassic Coyotlatelco pottery from Cerro Portezuelo: (a) Coyotlatelco Red-on-Cream, exterior decoration, and (b–c) Coyotlatelco Red-on-Natural ring-base bowl.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Selected examples of Mazapan Early Postclassic pottery from Cerro Portezuelo: (a) Wavy Line Burnished Variant, (b–c) Wavy Line Matte Variant, (d) Sloppy RN, (e) Joroba Cream Slip.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Selected examples of Early Postclassic pottery from Cerro Portezuelo: (a–c) Macana RN molcajete, (d) close-up of Blanco Levantado brush pattern, (e) Jara Pulido, (f1) Cream Slip of local production, interior of vessel, (f2) Cream Slip of local production, exterior of vessel.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Selected examples of Early Postclassic Aztec I and Chalco-Cholula pottery from Cerro Portezuelo: (a) Polychrome, (b–d) Aztec I Black-on-Orange, Chalco Variant, (e–g) Aztec I, Mixquic Variant stepped supports, (h) turkey head support.

Figure 9

Table 2. Epiclassic ceramics by INAA composition group; counts and percentages within type

Figure 10

Table 3. Early Postclassic ceramic types by composition group

Figure 11

Table 4. Early Postclassic Aztec by composition group