Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T19:45:56.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PEARL MILLET PRODUCTION PRACTICES IN BRAZIL: A REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2017

RENATO LARA DE ASSIS
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal Goiano Campus Iporá, Av. Oeste s/n, - Cep, 76200-000, Iporá, GO, Brazil
ROGÉRIO SOARES DE FREITAS
Affiliation:
Instituto Agronômico (IAC), Caixa Postal 61 - Cep, 15500-970, Votuporanga, SP, Brazil
STEPHEN C. MASON*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska, 279 Plant Science, 68583-0915, Lincoln, NE, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: smason1@unl.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is grown as a forage, cover and grain crop in Brazil. Historically, forage production has the most important use, but during the last 30 years, the use as a cover crop in no-till soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] production systems has expanded greatly and is currently used on over 5 million ha. Grain production as livestock feed is presently of minor importance but expanding. This review cites 125 references and documents pearl millet research conducted in Brazil which is largely published in Portuguese. The review addresses recommended pearl millet production practices for different uses, including stand establishment, row spacing and plant population, fertiliser and pest management, and the use of pearl millet in rotation and as a cover crop between soybean or maize (Zea mays L.) production to reduce crop losses from nematode infestation. It is concluded that greater research investment in crop improvement, fertiliser and pest management, nematode management, and forage/grain utilisation is needed to fully take advantage of pearl millet to meet feed, food and soil improvement needs in Brazil. In addition, creation of a database on pearl millet production, marketing and utilisation to assist farmers and grain merchandisers, and increased extension programming on pearl millet production is needed.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of article citations in this review based upon title and citation heading.

Figure 1

Table 2. Nutrient concentrations in above-ground biomass of pearl millet, maize and soybean grains in Brazil (adapted from Rostagno et al., 2005).

Figure 2

Table 3. Examples of above-ground nutrient uptake and recycling by pearl millet in Brazil.

Figure 3

Table 4. Soil phosphorus availability classes for the Cerrado region of Brazil based on clay concentration level (Adapted from Sousa and Lobato, 2004).

Figure 4

Table 5. Soil potassium availability classes for the Cerrado region of Brazil based on cation exchange capacity at pH = 7.0 (Adapted from Vilela et al., 2004).

Figure 5

Table 6. Recommended phosphate and potash fertiliser rates for pearl millet based on end use and soil test level (Adapted from Cantarutti et al., 1999 and Sousa and Lobato, 2004).

Figure 6

Table 7. Soil micronutrient availability classes for soils in the Brazilian Cerrados (Adapted from Galrão, 2004).