Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:39:50.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timing of plutonism in the Gällivare area: implications for Proterozoic crustal development in the northern Norrbotten ore district, Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2017

ZMAR SARLUS*
Affiliation:
Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
ULF B. ANDERSSON
Affiliation:
Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB, SE-981 86 Kiruna, Sweden
TOBIAS E. BAUER
Affiliation:
Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
CHRISTINA WANHAINEN
Affiliation:
Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
OLOF MARTINSSON
Affiliation:
Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden
ROGER NORDIN
Affiliation:
Boliden Mineral AB, SE- 936 81 Boliden, Sweden
JOEL B.H. ANDERSSON
Affiliation:
Division of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB, SE-981 86 Kiruna, Sweden
*
†Author for correspondence: zimer.sarlus@ltu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zircon ion probe (secondary-ion mass spectrometry or SIMS) data from a set of intrusive rocks emplaced in the vicinity of major ore bodies, as well as from large igneous intrusions in the Gällivare area, gave the following results: (1) the Dundret ultramafic–mafic layered complex (1883±5 Ma), the Aitik granite (1883±5 Ma), the Nautanen diorite (1870±12 Ma), the Vassaravaara ultramafic–mafic layered complex (1798±4 Ma), the Aitik dolerite (1813±9 Ma), the Bergmästergruvan and Sikträsk syenites (1795±4 Ma and 1801±3 Ma, respectively) and the Naalojärvi granite (1782±5 Ma). These data broadly fall within the ranges 1.89–1.87 Ga (early Svecofennian) and 1.80–1.78 Ga (late Svecofennian), but geochronologically allow further subdivision into pulses at 1885–1880, 1875–1870, 1800 and 1780 Ma. During these events, large layered ultramafic–mafic and felsic plutonic rocks were generated with distinct overlap in time suggesting coeval felsic–mafic magmatism. Results also indicate the presence of inherited c. 1.87 Ga zircon crystals in the plutonic rocks at 1.78 Ga, supporting reworking of the previous crust. These data indicate the importance of mantle-derived mafic underplating in the process of crustal magma generation in the region. The c. 1.88 Ga event that generated ultramafic–mafic layered complexes is tentatively suggested to have played an important role in the formation of the Aitik Cu–Au porphyry system. The later event at c. 1.80 Ga, generating voluminous mafic–felsic units, is suggested to be coupled to the regional iron-oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) overprint.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Generalized map of the Gällivare area with NDZ (Nautanen deformation zone) in east and FADZ (Fjällåsen-Allavaara deformation zones) in the west (modified from the Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU)). Coordinates in Swedish national grid system, SWEREF 99 TM. Inset map shows the generalized geology of the Fennoscandian shield (modified from Koistinen et al.2001). Dashed line marks the southern limit of hidden Archean basement as revealed by Nd isotopes in younger rocks (Mellqvist et al.1999; Öhlander et al.1993). The red square marks the study area.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) A cumulate portion of the Dundret layered complex. (b) Cathodoluminescence (CL) and backscattered electron (BSE) images of zircon crystals. 1, BSE image of zircon crystal with spot placed in bright zone giving younger 207Pb–206Pb age compare to the spot placed in a mixture zone giving slightly older 207Pb–206Pb age. 2, 3, Rather homogenous zircon crystals with overgrowths along the margins, distinguished by weak contrasts in the BSE images. The interior of the crystals is well preserved giving 207Pb–206Pb ages close to that of the crystallization age of the unit. 4a, b, BSE and CL image of the same crystals exhibiting magmatic rims that are wide with late overgrowth along the margins intruding inwards, best seen in 4b. A late overgrowth 207Pb–206Pb age is indicated by spot n5261-16R. 5, BSE image of zircon crystals with spot placed in a late overgrowth zone, yielding similar age within error as zircon crystals in 4. Yellow circles mark spot locations. (c) Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram and concordia age calculation for sample 11-ZS-13 (n = 8; grey ellipses are not included in age calculation). (d) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age with the 2σ level of confidence for same eight analyses as in (c). (e) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age from spots placed in observed bright zones in BSE images.

Figure 2

Table 1. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from, Dundret, Gällivare area, northern Norrbotten, Sweden. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. dz – dark zone in BSE imaging; bz – bright zone in BSE imaging; fz – fracture zone, cfz – close to fracture zone; mxz – mix zone between bright and dark domains in BSE images; mtmz – metamict zone; osc – oscillatory zoned; ov – overgrowth; hmz – homogenous zone.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) 1, Outcrop image of the layered gabbroic rock from the central part of the Vassaravaara intrusive complex. The white dashed lines indicate the primary magmatic layering. 2, Hand specimen from the Vassaravaara complex. (b) CL and BSE images of zircon crystals. 1, CL image of the zircon crystals, n5262-35_1 showing spot location placed within the centre of an oscillatory zoned crystal yielding a 207Pb–206Pb age of 1809 Ma. 2a, b, BSE and CL image of crystal n5262-35_2 showing irregular domains giving a heterogeneous character to the crystal and with an apparent overgrowth rim. A spot in a bright area (CL) yielded a 207Pb–206Pb age of 1804 Ma. 3, BSE image of more equant shape crystal with heterogeneous dark and bright zones and an overgrowth rim distinguished by weak contrast in the image. 4, Crystal with oscillatory zoned core apparently overgrown by homogenous outer rims, yielding a 207Pb–206Pb age of 1793 Ma. The second analyses in that crystal hit a metamict area which lost Pb. (c) Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram with ellipses of all analysed crystals. (d) Concordia age calculation for sample 10-ZS-13 (n = 26; grey ellipses are not included in age calculation). (e) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age with the 2σ level of confidence for the same set of analyses as in (d).

Figure 4

Table 2. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Vassaravaara layered complex. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (a) Outcrop image of the moderately but clearly foliated Aitik granite with oval-shaped mafic xenoliths. (b) CL and BSE images of zircon crystals. 1, BSE image of an oscillatory-zoned crystal yielding ages close to the calculated crystallization age of the intrusive. 2, Oscillatory zoned crystal with length:width ratio that differs from the crystal in 1. 3, Equant-shaped zircon crystal with oscillatory zoning. The crystal is strongly fractured and metamict and has lost the lead, as shown by the discordant analyses. 4, CL image of zircon crystal with oscillatory zoning as shown by distinct bright and dark domains. Some of these zones are metamict and have lost Pb, giving low 207Pb–206Pb ages. (c) 1, 2, Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram and concordia age calculation for sample 368-ZS-14 (grey ellipses are not included in age calculation). The turquoise near-concordant ellipse indicates a metamorphic overprint at c. 1815 Ma (b, 5). (d) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age with the 2σ level of confidence for the same set of analyses as in (c).

Figure 6

Table 3. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Aitik granite. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 7

Figure 5. (a) Hand specimen of the Naalojärvi granite with distinct pink colour. (b) CL and BSE images of zircon crystals. 1, Oscillatory zoned well-developed crystal with overgrowth domains clearly overprinting the primary zoning. Both spots on this crystal give younger ages mainly due to spots hitting fractures and/or metamict zones. 2, CL image of crystal with homogeneous bright and dark domains giving slightly varying ages. A late overgrowth rim along the margin appearing bright within the image can be distinguished. 3, Large zircon crystal with abundant fractures, oscillatory zoned core and later homogenous overgrowth rim that give similar age as crystal 2. The younger 207Pb–206Pb age from the interior of the crystal is likely due to spot hitting a fractured/metamict zone. Spot location indicated by yellow circles. 4, BSE image of zircon crystals with an inherited core of much older 207Pb–206Pb age surrounded by much younger overgrowth rim. (c) Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram and concordia age calculation based on the most concordant analysis (n = 8). (d) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age for the same set of analyses as in (c), apart from ellipsoid plotting near 1880 Ma. (e) Graph with all analysed spots and regression line indicating an upper intercept age close to 1780 Ma. Note the small near-concordant ellipse in red that represents the inherited core.

Figure 8

Table 4. Ion-microprobe U-Th-Pb data for zircons from Naalojärvi granite. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 9

Figure 6. (a) Outcrop image of the Bergmästergruvan walls, no. 6 in Figure 1. (b) CL, BSE and optical (transmitted plane-polarized light) images of zircon crystals. 1, Optical image of bright and clear crystal with significant internal metamictization, from Bergmästergruvan. 2, More turbid crystals from Bergmästergruvan. 3, 4, CL images showing a patchy interior pattern of probable resorption-reprecipitation processes, surrounded by homogeneous late overgrowth rims, Bergmästergruvan. 5, BSE image showing patchy resorption-reprecipitation features as well as high fracture frequency, Bergmästergruvan. 6, BSE image of zircon crystal from Sikträsk with homogenous dark and bright zones and strong fracturing network. A thin overgrowth rim on the eastern margin of the crystal can be observed. (c) Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram and concordia age calculation based on the seven oldest concordant analyses for sample 422-ZS-14, Bergmästergruvan, as well as regression through the whole dataset; grey ellipses are not included in the age calculation. (d) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age with 2σ level of confidence for the thirteen oldest near-concordant analyses Bergmästergruvan. (e) Reverse concordia graph (Tera–Wasserburg) and concordia age calculation for thirteen near concordant analyses of sample 30-ZS-14, Sikträsk. (f) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age with the 2σ level of confidence for all near-concordant analyses of the Sikträsk sample.

Figure 10

Table 5. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Bergmästergruvan. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 11

Table 6. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Aitik dolerite. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 12

Figure 7. (a) Outcrop image of the Aitik type dolerite with characteristic ophitic texture. (b) BSE and CL images of all collected zircon crystals. 1–3, relatively small crystals with distinct oscillatory-zoned cores and overgrowth rims. These crystals exhibit less fracturing compared to the larger crystals and give older 207Pb–206Pb ages that are close to calculated crystallization age of the unit. 4–6, These zircon crystals show three apparent growth zones: CL images reveal an inner core that is rimmed by the much brighter domain, that in turn is rimmed by slightly darker zone. 7, Grain with strongly fractured and probably partly metamict core, with rather homogenous outer rims. Spot locations in few crystals marked by yellow dashed circles. (c) 1, 2, Reverse concordia (Tera–Wasserburg) diagram and concordia age calculation, based on the four concordant analyses of sample 282-ZS-13, as well as a regressed discordia line through the whole dataset with upper and lower intercepts. Grey ellipses are not included in the concordia age calculation. (d) Calculated 207Pb–206Pb weighted average age of the four most near-concordant analyses with the 2σ level of confidence for the same sample as in (c).

Figure 13

Table 7. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Sikträsk deposit. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.

Figure 14

Figure 8. (a) Hand specimen image of the Nautanen diorite. (b) Zircon images. 1, CL image showing at least two secondary features, with a homogenous dark core that has been affected by later fluids forming channels within the crystals. A late overgrowth rims parts of the grain, as well as stretching towards the centre (white). Leaching and resorption phenomena are common within the sample. 2, BSE image showing an oscillatory zoned core that is strongly metamict, probably leached, which has lost lead, covered by a homogenous rim. Spot locations indicated by yellow circles. (c) Regressed black dashed line through part of the dataset gives an upper intercept age that is interpreted to represent the crystallization age of the rock. The red regressed dashed line gives an upper intercept that represents a metamorphic age. Grey ellipses deviating from the discordia are omitted from age calculations.

Figure 15

Table 8. Ion-microprobe U–Th–Pb data for zircons from Nautanen diorite. Data in grey shading omitted from age calculations. Acronyms in column 2 and footnotes as for Table 1.