Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T06:57:02.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Castrating parasites and colonial hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2012

H. HARTIKAINEN
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK
B. OKAMURA*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Tel: +44 (0)2079 426631. Fax: +44 (0)2079 425054. E-mail: b.okamura@nhm.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trajectories of life-history traits such as growth and reproduction generally level off with age and increasing size. However, colonial animals may exhibit indefinite, exponential growth via modular iteration thus providing a long-lived host source for parasite exploitation. In addition, modular iteration entails a lack of germ line sequestration. Castration of such hosts by parasites may therefore be impermanent or precluded, unlike the general case for unitary animal hosts. Despite these intriguing correlates of coloniality, patterns of colonial host exploitation have not been well studied. We examined these patterns by characterizing the responses of a myxozoan endoparasite, Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, and its colonial bryozoan host, Fredericella sultana, to 3 different resource levels. We show that (1) the development of infectious stages nearly always castrates colonies regardless of host condition, (2) castration reduces partial mortality and (3) development of transmission stages is resource-mediated. Unlike familiar castrator-host systems, this system appears to be characterized by periodic rather than permanent castration. Periodic castration may be permitted by 2 key life history traits: developmental cycling of the parasite between quiescent (covert infections) and virulent infectious stages (overt infections) and the absence of germ line sequestration which allows host reproduction in between bouts of castration.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Experimental setup. (A) One microcosm setup is shown (replicated 3 times for each food level). In each microcosm 2 sidetanks received water continuously from the main tank with fish and lights (circulation via airlifts (not shown) and U-tubes). (B) Infected and uninfected bryozoans attached to Petri dishes were housed together in the sidetanks (+P, infected colony; −P, uninfected colony). (C) Nine microcosms with different food levels (L, low; M, moderate; H, high) organized on each of 3 shelves in a single shelving unit, each shelf representing a treatment block. +P and −P, number of infected and uninfected colonies in each treatment at the end of the experiment. (D) Branch of F. sultana colony with T. bryosalmonae sacs (∼300 μm in diameter) crowding the colonial coelomic cavity.

Figure 1

Table 1. Significance of fixed factors and their interaction in mixed models for (a) specific growth rate and (b) partial mortality

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Prevalence (%) of colonies sustaining different categories of infection intensity at the different food level treatments. Infection intensities were classified as low (infection intensity classes 1+2), medium (infection intensity class 3) and high (infection intensity class 4) (see Materials and Methods section for further definition). Numbers above bars are n values, data pooled over microcosms.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Percentage of colonies producing statoblasts at low, moderate and high food levels by uninfected (−P) and infected (+P) F. sultana colonies. N-values are shown above bars, data pooled over microcosms.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean (A) Specific growth rate and (B) partial mortality rates (% of dead zooids) of F. sultana at low, moderate and high food levels. −P, uninfected, +P, infected, +SB, producing statoblasts, −SB, not producing statoblasts. Numbers above bars are n values, error bars are 95% confidence limits. Different letters above horizontal lines for each food level denote significant differences at P<0·05 (Tukeys tests).