In all ways but one, historians and scientists alike must consider the Second Byrd Antarctic Expedition (1933–1935) as one of the most successful of the five associated with Richard E. Byrd. It had 15 more participants on the ice (not counting the three dairy cows or the dogs) than his first in 1928–1930. Its success in using motorised carriers, airplanes (even an early helicopter), and radio for communication of field parties to base heralded more clearly than BAE I the coming of the mechanised era of polar exploration. As a whole, Byrd's men and equipment succeeded in adding much to the scientific knowledge of Antarctica. For the first time, seismic equipment succeeded in measuring the thickness of ice of the Ross Ice Shelf and on the Rockefeller Plateau. Lichens discovered and collected by the field parties in Marie Byrd Land and notably on Scott Glacier proved to be the first form of life so far south. Among the geographical discoveries were that no strait existed between the Ross and Weddell seas, and new peaks of the Queen Maud Mountains, the Rockefeller Mountains, and the Rockefeller Plateau. Geologists on motorised expeditions garnered evidence that the Ford Ranges had geological ties to the mountains of the Antarctic Peninsula. Finally, the story of Admiral Byrd's wintering by himself in a hut in the interior of Antarctica — published as Alone in 1938 — still stands as one of the most thrilling accounts of polar adventure.

The sole disappointment, until now, was that none of the 56 men published any diaries. Of course, Byrd compiled Discovery as the official history of the expedition. Others such as Joe Hill and Thomas Poulter added to the literature. Stuart Paine also wrote, with Jane Walden, The long whip: the story of a great husky, but this was a children's account that focused on Paine's lead dog. Diaries as firsthand accounts written during the event and unfiltered by others are valuable as historical records. Thus, Footsteps on the ice fills a significant gap in the literature about BAE II and about the history of Antarctic exploration.

Stuart D. Paine experienced BAE II as a dog driver and expedition navigator, a humble foot soldier in Byrd's campaign of exploration and scientific investigation. The son of a journalist and author, Paine graduated from Yale and took a position in advertising. Tiring of office work and looking for adventure, he eagerly joined his former roommate at Yale, Kennett Rawson, who was already a member of the expedition. During the expedition, Paine's principal accomplishments were navigating the fall sledging party far inland from the Ross Sea in order to lay supply depots for the following field season, and then, during the summer season, guiding the expedition's geological party into the Queen Maud Mountains, up the massive and previously unexplored Scott Glacier, and to within 207 statute miles of the South Pole, a journey of more than 1410 miles skied in just 88 days.

However demanding the task, Paine excelled in both undertaking the work and writing about it in his diary. Charles Murphy, a professional writer and Byrd's publicist on the expedition, recognised Paine's literary talent and had Paine write stories for broadcast when Murphy was ill. Passages in the diary itself provide evidence of the power that Paine had in using words to describe what he saw and experienced in Antarctica:

As a private and personal account, Paine freely expressed his feelings about other members of the expedition and the leadership. His sometimes negative comments about others — especially those who appeared to shirk their work or seemed unreliable — also reflected the real pressures of a man living stressfully in uncomfortable and confined spaces that deprived all of comfort and privacy. At one point, Paine even speculated that some of the men in the expedition might have been social misfits who saw the expedition as an escape from conventional society. Near the end of the diary, he admitted: ‘I have changed the last year and a half. I know I have grown cynical. Contrary to what I express, I have had great disappointments, not in opportunities but in personalities. I expect too much I know and not one lived up to expectations. Never again will I idealize men’ (page 256).

Although Paine maintained good relations with Byrd during and after the venture, in the diary he recorded his doubts about both Byrd and the expedition. He thought that Byrd's decision to winter alone, away from the base at Little America, was wrong. As Paine saw it, the Admiral's departure caused morale to plummet, and the camp suffered from personality conflicts, drunkenness, and split leadership. At one despondent moment, Paine even doubted that the expedition was anything more than a publicity stunt: ‘As far as I can see, our whole trip was futile and in vain. We are merely tools for the Admiral's ambitions’ (page 109).

As eloquent as Stuart Paine the writer was, the reader will also value the additions and explications of the editor, Merlyn Paine, his daughter. She contributes footnotes that link her father's diary with other accounts, including Discovery, and provides historical context for the entries. In addition, the footnotes explain many details of training dogs, preparations for fieldwork, navigating, and traveling on the ice. Another contribution of the editor is an appendix that contains selections from The Barrier Bull, a newspaper that Paine began during the expedition and of which only a few copies, for the members of the expedition itself, were printed. Noteworthy, too, is that the book contains many photographs from the personal collection of Stuart Paine, which have never been previously published.

After the expedition, Paine never returned to Antarctica. Like many polar adventurers, life's ordinary responsibilities — marriage, a family, service in World War II, running a business — took priority. Finally, cancer ended his life in 1960, at the age of 50. Nevertheless, Antarctica left a deep impression on him. In the final chapter of the book, the editor added words from an essay that Paine wrote after returning from Antarctica: ‘Let me go back to . . . where I contributed to the knowledge of the earth, where my work is of lasting value to science, to the only place where I enjoyed complete happiness and inward contentment. Even should I never do this, still I shall live, happy to a certain extent that I had done my part, as small as it was, to further the knowledge of mankind’ (page 278). (Raimund E. Goerler, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.)