Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:13:33.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biphasic assembly of the contractile apparatus during the first two cell division cycles in zebrafish embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

Sarah E. Webb
Affiliation:
Division of Life Science and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Cécile Goulet
Affiliation:
Division of Life Science and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Ching Man Chan
Affiliation:
Division of Life Science and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Michael Y. F. Yuen
Affiliation:
Division of Life Science and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Andrew L. Miller*
Affiliation:
Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA.
*
All correspondence to: Andrew L. Miller. Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. Tel: +1 852 2358 8631. Fax: +1 852 2358 1559. e-mail: almiller@ust.hk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The large and optically clear embryos of the zebrafish provide an excellent model system in which to study the dynamic assembly of the essential contractile band components, actin and myosin, via double fluorescent labelling in combination with confocal microscopy. We report the rapid appearance (i.e. within <2 min) of a restricted arc of F-actin patches along the prospective furrow plane in a central, apical region of the blastodisc cortex. These patches then fused with each other end-to-end forming multiple actin cables, which were subsequently bundled together forming an F-actin band. During this initial assembly phase, the F-actin-based structure did not elongate laterally, but was still restricted to an arc extending ~15° either side of the blastodisc apex. This initial assembly phase was then followed by an extension phase, where additional F-actin patches were added to each end of the original arc, thus extending it out to the edges of the blastodisc. The dynamics of phosphorylated myosin light chain 2 (MLC2) recruitment to this F-actin scaffold also reflect the two-phase nature of the contractile apparatus assembly. MLC2 was not associated with the initial F-actin arc, but MLC2 clusters were recruited and assembled into the extending ends of the band. We propose that the MLC2-free central region of the contractile apparatus acts to position and then extend the cleavage furrow in the correct plane, while the actomyosin ends alone generate the force required for furrow ingression. This biphasic assembly strategy may be required to successfully divide the early cells of large embryos.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Assembly of the contractile band during the first cell division cycle. (A) Schematic representation of a zebrafish embryo at the 1-cell stage (Aa) and 2-cell stage (Ab). AP and VP are animal and vegetal pole, respectively; B is blastodisc and 1st refers to the plane of cleavage of the first cell division cycle. (B) Animal pole views to show the distribution of F-actin in the assembling contractile band (CB) at various times from ~33 min post-fertilization (mpf) to ~43 mpf (a–g). (C) Higher magnification animal pole views that were acquired prior to (i.e., at ~31 mpf, (Ca)) and during (i.e., at ~33 mpf (Cb) and ~36 mpf (Cc)) the formation of the CB. M, micropyle. (D) Oblique-facial views of the CB at ~43 mpf. The regions bounded by the green and blue squares in panel (Da) are shown at higher magnification in panels (Db) and (Dc), respectively. (E) Animal pole views to show the localization of F-actin and phosphorylated-myosin light chain 2 (Ser19; MLC2) in the cleavage furrow from ~30 mpf to ~50 mpf. (F) Facial view of the CB to show the localization of F-actin and MLC2 at ~45 mpf. Each image is a projected stack of confocal optical sections. The key describes the arrows and arrowheads used in each panel. Scale bars are (A) 250 μm; (B, D, E, F) 50 μm and (C) 20 μm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Localization of calmodulin in the cleavage furrows during the first and second cell division cycles. (A, B) Representative embryos (n = 4) that were fixed at the time points indicated (bottom left corner of images Aa–Ah and Ba–Bd) and then calmodulin was labelled via indirect immunohistochemistry. These are (A) stacks of confocal sections taken through the animal pole that were projected as single images and (B) single optical sections of the blastodisc from a facial view. Panels a*–h* in (A) are high magnification views of the forming cleavage furrow taken from panels a–h, respectively. Arrowheads and asterisks indicate localization of calmodulin in the first and second cleavage furrows, respectively while arrows indicate the expression of calmodulin in the contractile band. Scale bars are 200 μm (Aa –Ah) and 100 μm (Aa*–Ah*, B).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Hypothetical model to illustrate a top view of our proposed biphasic dynamic assembly and extension of the actomyosin contractile band (CB) and associated localization of calmodulin during the first cell division cycle. BD, blastodisc edge; CaM, calmodulin; FP, prospective furrow plane; M, micropyle; MLC2, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2.