Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:18:00.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative analysis of the ecological dominance of benthic disaster taxa in the aftermath of the end-Permian mass extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2016

Elizabeth Petsios
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 3651Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, U.S.A. E-mail: petsios@usc.edu, dbottjer@usc.edu
David J. Bottjer
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 3651Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, U.S.A. E-mail: petsios@usc.edu, dbottjer@usc.edu

Abstract

The end-Permian mass extinction, the largest extinction of the Phanerozoic, led to a severe reduction in both taxonomic richness and ecological complexity of marine communities, eventually culminating in a dramatic ecological restructuring of communities. During the Early Triassic recovery interval, disaster taxa proliferated and numerically dominated many marine benthic invertebrate assemblages. These disaster taxa include the bivalve genera Claraia, Unionites, Eumorphotis, and Promyalina, and the inarticulate brachiopod Lingularia. The exact nature and extent of their dominance remains uncertain. Here, a quantitative analysis of the dominance of these taxa within the fossil communities of Panthalassa and Tethys benthic realms is undertaken for the stages of the Early Triassic to examine temporal and regional changes in disaster-taxon dominance as recovery progresses. Community dominance and disaster-taxon abundance is markedly different between Panthalassic and Tethyan communities. In Panthalassa, community evenness is low in the Induan stage but increases significantly in the Smithian and Spathian. This is coincident with a significant decrease in the relative abundance and occurrence frequency of the disaster taxa, most notably of the low-oxygen-affinity taxa Claraia and Lingularia. While the disaster taxa are present in post-Induan assemblages, other taxa, including two articulate brachiopod genera, outrank the disaster taxa in relative abundance. In the Tethys, assemblages are generally more even than contemporaneous Panthalassic assemblages. We observe an averaged trend toward more even communities with fewer disaster taxa in both Panthalassic and Tethyan assemblages over time.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Images of the five genera of Early Triassic disaster genera as summarized by Benton (2003). (A) Unionites cf. canalensis, (B) Promyalina cf. putiatinensis, (C) Lingularia borealis, (D) Eumorphotis cf. virginensis, and (E) Claraia aurita. Scale bar, 1 cm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Simplified Early Triassic map of Pangea showing regions where abundance collections reported in the Paleobiology Database were made, including western United States, western Canada, Italy, Pakistan, and South China. Modified from Scotese (2001) and Pietsch and Bottjer (2014).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Simpson’s dominance index (D) calculated using PAST software (Hammer et al. 2009) for the Induan, Smithian, and Spathian of (A) Panthalassic and (B) Tethyan collections. Mann-Whitney U-test p-values are reported between neighboring time bins. Bold values indicate significant change between time bins (a=0.05). Width of box plot represents relative number of collections used in the analysis.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Evenness (E1/D) calculated using PAST software (Hammer et al. 2009) for the Induan, Smithian, and Spathian of (A) Panthalassic and (B) Tethyan collections. Mann-Whitney U-test p-values are reported between neighboring time bins. Bold values indicate significant change between time bins (a=0.05). Width of box plot represents relative number of collections used in the analysis.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Regional comparison of dominance (D) and evenness (E1/D) between Panthalassic and Tethyan assemblages. Dominance is shown in (A) Induan, (B) Smithian, and (C) Spathian assemblages, and evenness is shown in (D) Induan, (E) Smithian, and (F) Spathian assemblages, with width of box plot representing relative number of collections used in the analysis. Mann-Whitney U-test p-values are reported between regions. Bold values indicate significant change between regions (a=0.05).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Overall relative abundance of all individuals reported from (A) Panthalassic and (B) Tethyan collections. The relative abundance of disaster taxa is shown in black, with all other taxa in white.

Figure 6

Figure 7 Occurrence frequency and average relative abundance of each genus for Panthalassic assemblages. Panthalassic occurrence frequency of genera is shown in the (A) Induan, (B) Smithian, and (C) Spathian, and Panthalassic average relative abundance is shown in the (D) Induan, (E) Smithian, and (F) Spathian. Disaster taxa are shown with open marks and all other genera are shown with solid marks.

Figure 7

Figure 8 Occurrence frequency and average relative abundance of each genus for Tethyan assemblages. Tethyan occurrence frequency of genera is shown in the (A) Induan, (B) Smithian, and (C) Spathian, and Tethyan average relative abundance is shown in the (D) Induan, (E) Smithian, and (F) Spathian. Disaster taxa are shown with open marks and all other genera are shown with solid marks.