Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:46:03.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioprosthetic heart valves’ structural integrity improvement through exogenous amino donor treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Yang Lei*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Wanyu Jin
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Rifang Luo
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Gaocan Li
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Gaoyang Guo
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Yunbing Wang*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: leiyang@scu.edu.cn

Abstract

Valvular heart diseases lead to over 300,000 heart valve replacements worldwide each year. Bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs), derived from glutaraldehyde (GLUT) crosslinked porcine or bovine pericardium, are often used. However, valve failure can occur within 12–15 years due to progressive degradation and/or calcification. Being innovated by previous amino reagent studies used for GLUT detoxification and carbodiimide [1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, EDC] chemistry, in this study, we developed a new fabrication method that utilizes exogenous amino donor arginine or lysine carbodiimide combined treatments to better stabilize the extracellular matrix of porcine pericardium. The carboxyl group density, amine content, differential scanning calorimetry, collagenase and elastase degradation, calcification by rat subdermal implantation, cytotoxicity, and platelet adhesion were characterized. We demonstrated that exogenous amino donor carbodiimide combined treatment for pericardiums had better resistance to elastase degradation (1.63 ± 0.11% and 1.44 ± 0.24% in arginine or lysine versus 3.68 ± 0.16% and 3.04 ± 0.11% in GLUT and GLUT/EDC control) and calcification (0.624 ± 0.193 and 0.637 ± 0.213 Ca µg/mg tissue in arginine or lysine versus 1.610 ± 0.124 and 1.512 ± 0.075 Ca µg/mg tissue in GLUT and GLUT/EDC control). This new strategy combined arginine or lysine and carbodiimide crosslinking would be a promising method to produce more robust BHVs with better structural stability and anticalcification property.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Crosslinking chemistry of pericardium. (a) GLUT crosslinking mechanism. (b) Arginine or lysine carbodiimide combined crosslinking. Black circles highlight amino groups in arginine and lysine.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Carboxyl group density quantification. GLUT: control 0.25% GLUT treatment. GLUT/EDC: 0.25% GLUT plus 0.2 M EDC/0.1 M NHS. GLUT/Arg/EDC: 0.25% GLUT plus 10% arginine plus 0.2 M EDC/0.1 M NHS. GLUT/Lys/EDC: 0.25% GLUT plus 10% lysine plus 0.2 M EDC/0.1 M NHS. (b) Amine content quantification. The asterisk (*) means significant difference (P < 0.05) between the compared two groups. N = 6 (six independent experiments).

Figure 2

TABLE I. Tissues thermal shrink temperature.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. (a) Collagen fiber by Picrosirius red staining, elastic fiber by Victoria blue staining, GAGs by Alcian blue staining, and calcification deposits by Alizarin red staining. Arrows highlight broken collagen fibers and broken elastic fibers. Scale bar: 100 µm. (b) Collagen stability of pericardium against collagenase degradation. (c) Elastin stability of pericardium against elastase degradation. (d) GAGs stability of pericardium against GAGase degradation. (e) Calcium content of each explant. The asterisk (*) means significant difference (P < 0.05) between the compared two groups. N = 6 (six independent experiments).

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Surface appearance by using a SEM in each group after collagenase (a) and elastase (b) degradation in vitro. Arrows highlight broken elastic fibers and collagen fibers. Scale bar: 10 µm. N = 3 (three independent experiments).

Figure 5

FIG. 5. (a) and (b) Maximum stress and maximum strain for each group. (c) Cytotoxicity of the treated tissues in each group. (d) Platelet adhesion test by using a SEM. Scale bar: 10 µm. (e) LDH quantification to determine number of adherent platelets. The asterisk (*) means significant difference (P < 0.05) between the compared two groups. N = 6 (six independent experiments).