This study examines human rights and gender-based violence (GBV) in the jurisdictions of East Asia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, including conflict-ridden territories such as Kashmir, Afghanistan, and Myanmar. The monograph returns, chapter after chapter, to one persistent question: has international law actually achieved anything positive for women in these regions? The editors have positioned GBV as a critical international law issue rather than merely a domestic social policy concern.
The introductory chapter examines how particular circumstances, including patriarchal norms, limited participation in leadership, socio-economic disadvantages, and the misinterpretation of religious texts impede women’s rights despite formal legal protective frameworks. The chapters that follow are organised loosely by theme rather than by geography.
Zixin Meng’s chapter on gender bias in international economic law (IEL) (Chapter 2) stands at a higher level of abstraction, distinct from the other chapters. The chapter’s thesis is that IEL is not gender-driven by design but bias arises from the dogmatic insistence on separating state governance from market functions. Meng’s argument spans two fields, international trade law and international investment law, both of which are rarely brought together in a single feminist analysis.
The book then moves to country-specific analyses. Chapter 3 on sexual harassment and rape law in Bangladesh (pp. 48–65) demonstrates two related failures: legislative and enforcement discrepancies. Syed Wasif Azim’s chapter about Pukhtun women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Chapter 4, pp. 66–84) is among the most ethnographically rich contributions. Chapters 5 and 6 are about China, with each chapter investigating a separate legal failure. Prerna Dhoop’s chapter on India (Chapter 7) asks why women rarely invoke the Indian Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, despite its long existence. Basil Fernando’s contribution (Chapter 9) takes Sri Lanka as its primary site of inquiry, but the arguments are not specific to it. Writing from decades of human rights practice in Asia, he argues that the public institutions responsible for investigation, prosecution, and adjudication lack operational capacity and independence.
The book’s strength is its comparative breadth. Studies on GBV and international law often are organised around either a single jurisdiction or a single instrument (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [CEDAW] in particular), which relegate Asia to a vague afterthought instead of a unified lens.
In conclusion, this book is a serious contribution to feminist jurisprudence. It asks the right questions about institutional failure and the limits of legislative reforms. It would have benefited from engaging with the widespread Asian practice of reserving core CEDAW provisions. Scholars focused on feminist approaches to international law or CEDAW enforcement will find the country chapters detailed enough to stand on their own. For researchers working across the region, the comparative framework is reason enough to read the monograph as a whole.
Competing interests
The authors declare none.