Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:33:01.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of luminescence properties of Ca0.8Zn0.2TiO3:Pr3+ prepared by hydrothermal method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Liping Yu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Mao Xia
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Xun Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Chunying Rong
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Jinlin Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Wenli Zhou
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Ming Ma*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Traditional Chinese Medicine Research (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Shixun Lian*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Resources Processing and Advanced Materials of Hunan Province, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: seaheart_yu@163.com

Abstract

Red-emitting phosphor of Ca0.8Zn0.2TiO3:0.2 mol% Pr3+ was synthesized by the hydrothermal method with urea as a mineralizer. The crystalline structure, micromorphology, and luminescent properties of the resultant phosphor were investigated. Results show that elevated calcination temperature does not change the shape of particles that are hollow spheres with a shell thickness of 210–480 nm, and smaller particles are in the middle of the larger ones. The emission intensity at 612 nm originated from 1D2 → 3H4 transition of Pr3+ ions increases with the elevated calcination temperature due to a higher crystallinity. Excitation curves consist of two strong broad bands centered at about 330 and 380 nm and a weaker broad band range from 450 to 500 nm. The sample prepared by the hydrothermal method has better luminescent properties than that of its counterpart prepared by the solid-state method, especially the improvement of near-UV region (380 nm) excitation intensity.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1.XRD pattern of the uncalcined sample prepared by the hydrothermal method. The inset is IR spectrum of the uncalcined sample.

Figure 1

FIG. 2.XRD patterns of Ca0.8Zn0.2TiO3:0.2 mol% Pr3+ calcined at different temperatures.

Figure 2

TABLE I.Phase content for samples calcined at different temperatures (wt%).

Figure 3

FIG. 3.SEM micrographs of Ca0.8Zn0.2TiO3:0.2 mol% Pr3+ uncalcined (a) and calcined at (b) 800 °C, (c) 950 °C, (d) 1000 °C, (e) 1050 °C, and (f) 1150 °C for 3 h. The insets are SEM micrographs with higher magnification.

Figure 4

FIG. 4.The emission (a) and excitation (b) spectra of samples fired at different temperatures. The inset a is the relationship between the emission intensity of Ca0.8Zn0.2TiO3:0.2 mol% Pr3+ (λex = 330 and 380 nm) and different calcination temperatures and the inset b is the ratio of band B to band A.

Figure 5

FIG. 5.Excitation intensities of peak at 330 nm (a), 380 nm (b) at different calcination temperatures. The inset is normalized excitation curves.

Figure 6

FIG. 6.Comparison of excitation intensities of samples prepared at 1150 °C by the solid-state (dashed line) method and hydrothermal method (solid line and dotted line), respectively.

Figure 7

FIG. 7.Decay curve of the sample prepared by the solid-state method (a) and hydrothermal method (b) calcining at 1150 °C, monitoring at 612 nm, excited at 330 nm.

Figure 8

FIG. 8.The corresponding CIE chromaticity of diagram of sample calcinated at 800 °C (a), 900 °C (b), and 1150 °C (c).