Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:13:34.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-based ternary bulk metallic glasses with ultrahigh strength and plasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2011

Jianfeng Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Materials and Performance (Ministry of Education), School of Material Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
Ran Li*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Materials and Performance (Ministry of Education), School of Material Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
Nengbin Hua
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Materials and Performance (Ministry of Education), School of Material Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
Tao Zhang*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Materials and Performance (Ministry of Education), School of Material Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: liran@buaa.edu.cn

Abstract

A family of ultrahigh strength Co-based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with critical diameters up to 2 mm is synthesized in Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 5–10) alloys by copper mold casting. The improved glass-forming ability associated with near eutectic compositions is attributed to the appropriate addition of Ta. The glassy alloys exhibit high glass transition temperature of 930–975 K, ultrahigh compressive strength of 5.6–6.0 GPa, high specific strength of 639–654 N·m/g, Vickers hardness of 15–16 GPa, and distinct plastic strain of 0.5–1.5%. The strength and the specific strength are the highest values reported for bulk metallic materials known so far. Several universal criteria correlated with the thermal properties, elastic constants, and mechanical properties were validated in the Co-based BMG system. These Co–Ta–B BMGs combining with superior mechanical properties, high thermal stability, and simple elemental composition are significant for scientific research as modeling materials and industrial application as advanced structural materials.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 5–10) bulk metallic glasses (BMGs).

Figure 1

TABLE I. The critical sizes (dc), thermal properties, and parameters of Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 0, 5–10) glassy alloys. Tg, Tx, Tm, and Tl are the glass transition temperature, the onset temperature of crystallization, the melting temperature, and the liquidus temperatures, respectively. ΔTx = Tx – Tg, Trg = Tg/Tl, γ = Tx/(Tg + Tl), and α is a parameter described in Ref. 18.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Differential scanning calorimetry curves of Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 5–10) BMGs: (a) glass transition and crystallization behaviors at a heating rate of 0.67 K/s; (b) melting behaviors at a heating rate of 0.33 K/s.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Compressive true stress–strain curves of Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 5–10) glassy rods.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Scanning electron microscopy images of the deformed and fractured samples for Co60Ta5B35 BMG: (a) the outline surface of the deformed sample; (b) fracture fragments; the morphology of the fragments with (c) shell patterns, and (d) vein-like patterns.

Figure 5

TABLE II. Compressive mechanical properties, elastic constants, and related physical properties of Co65–xTaxB35 (at.%, x = 5–10) BMGs. ρ, V, Hv, σy, σc, εp, E, G, B, and ν are density, molar volume, Vickers hardness, yield strength, compressive strength, plastic strain, respectively. E, G, B, and v are Young’s modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus, and Poisson’s ratio, respectively.

Figure 6

FIG. 5. Relationship between shear stress (τy) and shear modulus (G) for various BMGs including the ultrahigh strength Co-based BMGs developed in this study.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Relationship between shear stress (τy) and (Tg – TRM)/V for various BMGs including the ultrahigh strength Co-based BMGs developed in this study. The solid line is plotted following Eq. (2), i.e., τy = 3R(Tg – TRM)/V.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Correlation between 2BV/RKα and Tg for various BMGs including the ultrahigh strength Co-based BMGs developed in this study. The dashed line is plotted according to Eq. (3) with $\varepsilon _{\rm{v}}^{T,{\rm{crit}}} \,=\, 0.092$.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Relationship between Vickers hardness (Hv) and Young’s modulus (E) for various BMGs. The compositions of these BMGs are listed as follows: 1. Ce70Al10Ni10Cu10, 2. Nd60Al10Fe20Co10, 3. Mg65Cu25Tb5, 4. La55Al25Cu10Ni5Co5, 5. Pd77.5Si16.5Cu6, 6. Pd40Ni10Cu30P20, 7. Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5, 8. Pd40Ni40P20, 9. Zr57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10, 10. Cu50Zr45Al5, 11. Zr65Al10Ni10Cu15, 12. Cu50Zr50, 13. Zr57Nb5Cu15.4Ni12.6Al10, 14. Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5, 15. Cu60Hf10Zr20Ti10, 16. Ni50Nb50, 17. Ni45Ti20Zr25Al10, 18. Ni40Cu5Ti17Zr28Al10, 19. Ni39.8Cu5.97Ti15.92Zr27.86Al9.95Si0.5, 20. Fe64Mo14C15B6Er1, 21. Fe64Cr3Mo10P10C10B3, 22. Fe65Cr2Mo9P10C8B6, 23. Co58Ta7B35, 24. Co57Ta8B35, and 25. Co56Ta9B35.