Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:04:25.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Karst development on a mobile substrate: Konarsiah salt extrusion, Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2011

MEHDI ZAREỊ
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
EZATOLAH RAEISI
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
CHRISTOPHER J. TALBOT*
Affiliation:
Hans Ramberg Tectonic Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden
*
†Author for correspondence: Christopher.Talbot@geo.uu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most karst terranes develop slowly on static limestone substrates as part of the global hydrological cycle. Here we introduce the novel concept of a karst morphology developing very rapidly on a more soluble substrate of salt (NaCl) that is moving through its own global cycle. We open with a reminder of karst features and processes in limestone. We then illustrate the global salt cycle using the 180 or so extrusions of Hormoz salt in the Zagros Mountains of Iran. After describing the geology of an example, we consider how it fits into the evolution of salt extrusions. This example, Konarsiah, was chosen for its simple hydrology. Konarsiah is covered by residual soils of the insoluble components that remain in place as the Hormoz salt is dissolved. Dolines in the surface of these soils enlarge and the soils thicken as the moving salt dissolves. The long-term rate of salt dissolution and soil production on Konarsiah are estimated using traditional methods. The calculated age of the thickest, most distal soil is used to constrain the average rate at which the underlying salt flows downslope after extruding from two vents. The average velocities constrained for salt flow are lower than rates of displacement of markers near the summit of Konarsiah measured at irregular intervals over five years. Salt extruding from recently truncated diapirs near the arid south coast of Iran exhibit all the features seen in classical karst terranes. In the more humid mountains inland, vegetated soils protect salt extrusions like Konarsiah from erosion and limit their salt karst features. Soil covers also probably even out salt flow velocities. Salt extrusions advance when such protective covers grow and thicken in humid conditions. They retreat when such protection is lost to erosion in drier conditions. These external signs complement internal recumbent folds in extruded salt that signal intervals of faster salt flow when wet than dry. They also add to the features that render salt extrusions records of climate change.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. How subaerial extrusives of Hormoz salt in the Zagros Mountains of Iran relate to the global salt cycle. Approximate times refer to Konarsiah (modified after fig. 2 in Talbot et al. 2000).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The relief and morphology of Konarsiah. (a) A digital elevation model for Konarsiah seen obliquely from the WSW. (b) Panorama of Konarsiah from about 3 km to the south. (c) Panorama of zone 2 dolines looking south from near summit. (d) Close-up of dolines in zone 2. (e) Young doline developing in an older example in zone 3. (f) Salt exposed in the wall of a major doline in zone 3. (g) Recumbent folds in salt exposed in the southern terminus.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Zones 1–4 with different slopes, soil thicknesses and karstic features. Insert shows regional setting. Line of section refers to profile in Figure 4.

Figure 3

Figure 4. True scale profiles of Konarsiah and its four zones. (a) Dogleg profile along path shown on Figure 3. (b) Qualitative graph of horizontal velocity of salt flow from southern summit to SSW (after models in Talbot et al. 2000). (c) Cartoons of karst features, soils and salt in zones 1–4.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Hydrograph of selected Konarsiah brine springs in the measured period (from Zarei & Raeisi, 2010).

Figure 5

Figure 6. An aerial photo laydown showing edge of salt on Konarsiah (= Kuh-e-Namak, Feroosabad), the likely outlines of surface salt rising from the two vents, traces of strands of the Mangerak fault in its country rocks, and the location of theodolite stations A3 and C3 from which measurements in Figures 7 and 8 were made.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Scaled vectors of displacements of natural markers shown on perspective sketch of Konarsiah as seen from theodolite survey station Alavi #3 over six epochs. Heavy lines indicate skyline of Konarsiah; thin lines indicate tops of river cliffs or conspicuous ridges. Displacement of each marker is reported in metres U or D (up or down) and L or R (left or right). Ov or Oh means no measurable vertical or horizontal movement. The readings shown have an accuracy estimated at ± 1 dm. Some markers were lost and new markers were added over the years. Data from unpublished Talbot reports to the Geological Survey of Iran from 1993 to 2001.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Crude contours of vertical displacements of markers (and scaled vectors of horizontal displacements) on Konarsiah measured from theodolite station Alavi #3 on bedrock during three increments. Displacement terminology here as in Figure 7.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Conceptual cartoon of how the global cycles of H2O and NaCl interact at Konarsiah.