Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:25:14.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced photocatalytic activities on Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

Na Tian
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Hongwei Huang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Yihe Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Ying He*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: hhw@cugb.edu.cn
b) e-mail: zyh@cugb.edu.cn

Abstract

Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 composite photocatalysts have been successfully synthesized by a mixed calcination method after hydrothermal process. The catalysts were characterized by powder x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum. The results showed that the hierarchical Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 nanocomposites were obtained by mixed grinding calcination method and Bi2O2CO3 nanospheres grow on the primary ZnWO4 particles. The Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 composites exhibit higher photocatalytic activities compared to pure ZnWO4 and Bi2O2CO3 particles under UV light irradiation. Furthermore, the excellent photocatalytic efficiency of the Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 composite was deduced closely related to Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 heterojunctions whose presence is generally regarded to be a favorable factor for the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. XRD patterns of pure ZnWO4, Bi2O2CO3, and the Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 composites with different molar ratios of ZnWO4 versus Bi2O2CO3, respectively.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. SEM images of the as-obtained samples: (a) ZnWO4, (b) Bi2O2CO3, (c) 0.15 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, (d) 0.2 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, (e) 0.25 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, and (f) 0.3 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a–c) TEM and (d) HRTEM images of the as-obtained sample of 0.25 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Typical XPS survey spectra of 0.25 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. High-resolution XPS spectra of 0.25 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4: (a) Bi 4f; (b) Zn 2p; (c) W 4f; and (d) O 1s.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of ZnWO4, Bi2O2CO3, 0.15 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, 0.2 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, 0.25 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4, and 0.3 Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Photocatalytic degradation of MB (1 × 10−5 mg/L, 100 mL) by different photocatalysts under UV light irradiation, where C is the absorption intensity of MB at the maximum wave length of 665 nm irradiated by different time and C0 is the absorption intensity of MB after the adsorption–desorption equilibrium on photocatalyst before irradiation.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Kinetic fit for the degradation of MB under UV light irradiation.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Band structure diagram and electron–hole separation of Bi2O2CO3/ZnWO4 composite.