Databases used for literature retrieval included PubMed, Google, Google Scholar and the ILAE website. Search terms for retrieval included “ILAE Classification,” “temporal plus epilepsy” and “multilobar epilepsy.” Wirrell et al.’s “guiding principles” and “template” for characterizing epilepsy syndromes
Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2
were used to describe the features of TPE. We focused on TPE because it is one of the best-described multilobar epilepsies.
Background and epidemiology
Multilobar involvement was found in 11% of 2177 patients in the Montreal Neurological Institute’s 1929–1980 seizure surgery series.
Reference Rasmussen3
One-fifth of pediatric epilepsy surgeries are for pharmacoresistant multilobar epilepsies, and multilobar epilepsies often have their onset in early childhood, both sexes being equally affected.
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7
The term “temporal plus epilepsy” (TPE) has been used to describe an epileptic entity in which the epileptogenic zone (EZ) involves a complex epileptogenic network that includes the (TL and anatomically and functionally connected “neighboring” regions beyond its limits.
Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10
Kahane et al. characterized TPE as a multilobar epilepsy.
Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9
The incidence of TPE has ranged from 7% to 55% of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy; methodological differences between series, including the total number of patients in each, likely contributed to the wide variation.
Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10–Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15
For example, TPE was diagnosed in 27.5% of 80 medically resistant patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who underwent stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG),
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8
11% of 168 adult patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy or disconnection,
Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10
7% of 88 patients who had surgery following SEEG recordings,
Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11
44% of 109 pediatric patients who had temporal lobectomy
Reference Arya, Mangano and Horn12
and 43% of 121 children with medically refractory TLE who underwent magnetoencephalography (MEG).
Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13
Most reports have been in adults; however, three focused exclusively on children.
Reference Arya, Mangano and Horn12,Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15
Features of TPE
General
In addition to the TL, the regions involved in the EZ of TPE include the orbitofrontal cortex, insula, frontal and parietal operculum and temporo-parieto-occipital junction (Figure 2).
Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17
Three tentative TPE subgroups have been described (Table 1): temporo-frontal, temporo-perisylvian (includes insula) and temporo-parietal-occipital; however, their EZs and therefore their electro-clinical features may overlap,
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17
and EZs can be considered to be patient-specific. The overlap is exemplified by some of the cases in the series of Sarkis et al., Serletis et al. and Kogias et al.
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7
Figure 2.
(Reproduced from Barba et al. 2016; reference # 10).*Brain regions involved in the epileptogenic zone of temporal plus epilepsy. Temporal lobe: blue; orbitofrontal cortex: violet; suprasylvian operculum: brown; insula (hidden within the lateral sulcus; hence shown in the inset figure): red; temporo-parieto-occipital junction: green. Percentages refer to the percentage of patients with involvement of the respective brain regions in the study of Barba et al. (2016); please see reference # 10 for further details. *Figure reproduced in accordance with a University of Saskatchewan library license agreement with Oxford University Press (https://library.usask.ca/copyright/authors-and-creators/re-using-figures.php).
Figure 2 Long description
The diagram illustrates various brain regions involved in the epileptogenic zone of temporal plus epilepsy. The temporal lobe is highlighted in blue, the orbitofrontal cortex in violet, the suprasylvian operculum in brown, the insula in red, and the temporo-parieto-occipital junction in green. Percentages indicate the involvement of each region in patients, with the temporal lobe at one hundred percent, the orbitofrontal cortex at one point two percent, the suprasylvian operculum at two point four percent, the insula at four point two percent, and the temporo-parieto-occipital junction at three percent. An inset figure shows a detailed view of the insula.
Table 1.
Seizure semiology and scalp video-EEG in temporal plus epilepsy (TPE) subgroups

Table 1 Long description
The table compares key features of temporo-frontal, temporo-perisylvian/insula, and temporo-parieto-occipital subgroups of TPE. It has five columns: Key features, Temporo-frontal, Temporo-perisylvian/insula, and Temporo-parieto-occipital. The rows detail various aspects such as onset, aura, impaired awareness, motor, autonomic, duration, and scalp V-EEG. For instance, the onset for temporo-frontal is often in sleep and in clusters, while for temporo-perisylvian/insula, it is often in sleep and may be reflex induced. The temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup has no data for onset. The aura for temporo-frontal includes none or nonspecific sensations, while temporo-perisylvian/insula includes gustatory, nausea, throat/laryngeal constriction, breathlessness, orofacial paresthesia, and painful paresthesia. The temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup includes vestibular, example rotation, vertigo, auditory, visual, and somatosensory auras. Impaired awareness involves focal seizures with and without impaired awareness for both temporo-frontal and temporo-parieto-occipital subgroups, while temporo-perisylvian/insula involves focal seizures with impaired awareness. Motor features for temporo-frontal include hypermotor seizures, complex motor behaviors, and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Temporo-perisylvian/insula includes facial or faciobrachial jerks with or without focal and/or bilateral generalized tonic-clonic seizures. There is no data for motor features in the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup. Autonomic features for temporo-frontal include urinary urge and possible changes in heart rate/respiratory rhythm. Temporo-perisylvian/insula includes hypersalivation, nausea, facial blush, sweaty hands, piloerection, changes in heart rate/respiratory rhythms, and urinary urge. Autonomic features are uncommon in the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup. Duration is relatively short for temporo-frontal, variable for temporo-perisylvian/insula, and no data for temporo-parieto-occipital. Scalp V-EEG for temporo-frontal includes ipsilateral frontal abnormalities, for temporo-perisylvian/insula includes ipsilateral temporal, temporo-frontal temporo-central, fronto-central interictal or ictal abnormalities rapidly spreading to the other side, and for temporo-parieto-occipital includes ipsilateral temporo-parietal interictal or ictal abnormalities.
Seizure semiology
Children and the cognitively impaired may not be able to describe an aura or the onset. Both focal aware and impaired awareness seizures have been reported.
Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14
The features described in the Table 1 should be considered as “red flags,” their sensitivity and specificity being unknown.
Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9
Another potential “red flag” may be the occurrence of two distinct seizures types, one with features of TL origin and the other suggesting origin in an adjacent lobe (e.g., cases 1 and 5 in Bottan et al.).
Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11
Postictally, dysphoria may be more common in TPE patients than in those with just TL involvement.
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9
The involvement of the insula-orbito-frontal or frontal-opercular regions in TPE may be associated with ictal changes in cardiac and respiratory rhythms and risk of unexpected death.
Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti18
Scalp (video-) electroencephalographic features
Inter-ictal and ictal findings depend on the region(s) involved in the EZ (Table 1).
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17
Ictally, scalp EEG may suggest lateral temporal or extratemporal onset or early extratemporal spread.
Reference Ryvlin and Kahane19
Neuroimaging
Brain MRI may be unremarkable in TPE but can show hippocampal sclerosis (HS),
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11
focal cortical dysplasia (FCD),
Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20
etc. Malformations of cortical development are particularly important associations in children.
Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21
Techniques such as 3-D MP-RAGE (Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo) may help to differentiate between TPE and TLE.
Reference Yin, Yan and Gao22
Positron emission tomography (PET) and other noninvasive investigations
In one study using PET, patients with TPE showed ipsilateral hypometabolism involving temporal and adjacent extratemporal structures.
Reference Guedj, Bonini and Gavaret23
Sample sizes were inadequate to compare findings in patients with TPE with those who had mesial TLE (MTLE), neocortical TLE (NTLE) and bilateral TLE.
Reference Guedj, Bonini and Gavaret23
In addition to video-EEG, MRI and PET, the evaluation of pharmacoresistant TPE (and other multilobar epilepsies) has included (in various combinations) the Wada test, functional MRI (fMRI), interictal and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI and MEG.
Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6,Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10–Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14
Currently, the information on simultaneous EEG and fMRI (EEG-fMRI) is insufficient to opine on its role in the diagnosis and management of multilobar epilepsies.
Reference Ikemoto, von Ellenrieder and Gotman24
On the basis of a single post hoc case report, Gong et al. suggested that multimodal and neurophysiological integration might be useful in the presurgical evaluation of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
Reference Gong, Bickel and Tostaeva25
Neuropsychological testing and findings
Predominant dysfunction in aspects other than memory should raise suspicion for temporal neocortical or extratemporal involvement; fMRI may provide complementary information in TPE and other multilobar epilepsies. Multilobar epilepsies in children are associated with a high probability of cognitive impairment.
Reference Moorhouse, Cornell and Gerstl26
Intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG)
IEEG can complement noninvasive evaluation in TPE and other multilobar epilepsies when surgical treatment is a consideration.
Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27
In this situation, the individual patient-specific objectives include (1) differentiating between unifocal, lobar and multilobar epilepsies, especially when noninvasive data are ambiguous, (2) mapping the extent of the EZ and (3) delineating eloquent cortex.
Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27
Further details on IEEG are beyond the scope of this communication.
TPE and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE)
Unrecognized TPE is an important cause of failures of standard anterior temporal lobectomy in MTLE.
Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10
Clinical and scalp EEG features in TPE and MTLE may be similar, with seizures arising from juxtatemporal regions mimicking those arising from mesial temporal structures.
Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11
Additionally, HS can be associated with both TPE and MTLE.
Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11
Since the TL is always involved in the EZ of TPE, it is not surprising that TPE can mimic TLE, explaining why preoperatively unrecognized TPE is an important cause of TLE surgery failures.
Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2–Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10
These observations lead to two inter-linked conclusions: (1) MTLS-HS may not be as specific an electro-clinical epilepsy syndrome as implied in the current ILAE classification,
Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2,Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28
and (2) TPE must always be considered in the differential diagnosis of MTLE with or without HS. IEEG is often necessary to distinguish TPE from MTLE, especially when noninvasive data are inconclusive.
Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27
Other multilobar epilepsies
Multilobar epilepsies other than TPE include (1) “orbitofrontal plus temporal polar” epilepsy
Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6
and the less well characterized “frontal plus epilepsy”;
Reference Rasmussen3
both may overlap with the temporo-frontal subgroup of TPE, and (2) “occipital plus” and “posterior cortex” epilepsies,
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Jacobs29
which may overlap with the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup of TPE. Their onset is often in childhood.
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6,Reference Jacobs29
Serletis et al. emphasized the importance of differentiating between “orbitofrontal plus frontal” (a “lobar” epilepsy) and “orbitofrontal plus temporal polar” epilepsy (a “multilobar” epilepsy); in their series, the former responded to tailored frontal lobar excision and the latter to tailored multilobar orbitofrontal and temporal polar resection.
Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6
Etiologies
MRI and post-surgery specimens have shown the following associations with TPE and other multilobar epilepsies: HS, gliosis, cavernous angioma, abnormalities of cortical development including mild malformations of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE) tubers, perinatal and postnatal ischemic lesions, benign tumors, Sturge–Weber syndrome, etc.
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21,Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28–Reference Sugano, Iimura and Suzuki30
Early childhood onset is frequently associated with FCDs.
Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11–Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21,Reference Jacobs29
Introduction
The International League against Epilepsy’s (ILAE’s) current three level classification of the epilepsies incorporates (1) seizure type (defined by onset), (2) epilepsy type and (3) syndrome type (Figure 1). Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 The ILAE classification is based on “high-level expert opinion, including an extensive consultation with epilepsy professionals and the wider epilepsy community worldwide.” Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1
Framework for classification of the epilepsies. Figure has been adapted from figure 1 in Scheffer et al. (2017)Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1 and Wirell et al.(2022).Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 *denotes onset of the seizure. **Combined: combined generalized and focal type; *** & ****: syndromes with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and syndromes with progressive neurological deterioration (PND).
Figure 1 Long description
The flowchart illustrates the classification of epilepsies by the International League against Epilepsy. It begins with seizure types, which are categorized into focal, generalized, and unknown. This leads to epilepsy types, which are further divided into focal, generalized, combined, and unknown. The combined category includes both generalized and focal types. The final level is epilepsy syndromes, which are categorized into focal, generalized, generalized and focal, and syndromes with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy and progressive neurological deterioration.
An epilepsy syndrome has been defined as “a characteristic cluster of clinical and EEG features, often supported by specific etiological findings.” Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 However, “there is no clear one-to-one correlation” between a patient’s epilepsy or epilepsy syndrome and etiology, and some syndromes, for example, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, may be caused by several etiologies. Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 Classification of epilepsy type and syndromic diagnosis can influence choice of medical and surgical treatment. Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2
Multilobar epilepsies, with seizures arising from a complex epileptogenic network involving contiguous lobes in a hemisphere, have been reported since at least 1991. Reference Rasmussen3 Temporal plus epilepsy (TPE), the best known of the multilobar epilepsies, was first described in 2001; the authors suggested that unrecognized TPE could be responsible for some failures of standard temporal lobe (TL) surgery. Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4 Multilobar epilepsies are an important cause of pharmacoresistant epilepsy across the age spectrum. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7 Despite this background information, multilobar epilepsies have not been mentioned in the current ILAE classification of epilepsies and epilepsy syndromes. Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 The ILAE classification is a de facto stamp of recognition; failure to incorporate an entity can result in its underdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
Multilobar epilepsy should be recognized as distinct from multifocal epilepsy, in which the epileptogenic regions are functionally and anatomically independent of each other.
In this conceptual paper, we summarize qualitative evidence to suggest that multilobar epilepsies such as TPE warrant a place in the ILAE classification.
Methods
Databases used for literature retrieval included PubMed, Google, Google Scholar and the ILAE website. Search terms for retrieval included “ILAE Classification,” “temporal plus epilepsy” and “multilobar epilepsy.” Wirrell et al.’s “guiding principles” and “template” for characterizing epilepsy syndromes Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 were used to describe the features of TPE. We focused on TPE because it is one of the best-described multilobar epilepsies.
Background and epidemiology
Multilobar involvement was found in 11% of 2177 patients in the Montreal Neurological Institute’s 1929–1980 seizure surgery series. Reference Rasmussen3 One-fifth of pediatric epilepsy surgeries are for pharmacoresistant multilobar epilepsies, and multilobar epilepsies often have their onset in early childhood, both sexes being equally affected. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7
The term “temporal plus epilepsy” (TPE) has been used to describe an epileptic entity in which the epileptogenic zone (EZ) involves a complex epileptogenic network that includes the (TL and anatomically and functionally connected “neighboring” regions beyond its limits. Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10 Kahane et al. characterized TPE as a multilobar epilepsy. Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9
The incidence of TPE has ranged from 7% to 55% of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy; methodological differences between series, including the total number of patients in each, likely contributed to the wide variation. Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10–Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15 For example, TPE was diagnosed in 27.5% of 80 medically resistant patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who underwent stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG), Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8 11% of 168 adult patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy or disconnection, Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10 7% of 88 patients who had surgery following SEEG recordings, Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11 44% of 109 pediatric patients who had temporal lobectomy Reference Arya, Mangano and Horn12 and 43% of 121 children with medically refractory TLE who underwent magnetoencephalography (MEG). Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13 Most reports have been in adults; however, three focused exclusively on children. Reference Arya, Mangano and Horn12,Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15
Features of TPE
General
In addition to the TL, the regions involved in the EZ of TPE include the orbitofrontal cortex, insula, frontal and parietal operculum and temporo-parieto-occipital junction (Figure 2). Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17 Three tentative TPE subgroups have been described (Table 1): temporo-frontal, temporo-perisylvian (includes insula) and temporo-parietal-occipital; however, their EZs and therefore their electro-clinical features may overlap, Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17 and EZs can be considered to be patient-specific. The overlap is exemplified by some of the cases in the series of Sarkis et al., Serletis et al. and Kogias et al. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7
(Reproduced from Barba et al. 2016; reference # 10).*Brain regions involved in the epileptogenic zone of temporal plus epilepsy. Temporal lobe: blue; orbitofrontal cortex: violet; suprasylvian operculum: brown; insula (hidden within the lateral sulcus; hence shown in the inset figure): red; temporo-parieto-occipital junction: green. Percentages refer to the percentage of patients with involvement of the respective brain regions in the study of Barba et al. (2016); please see reference # 10 for further details. *Figure reproduced in accordance with a University of Saskatchewan library license agreement with Oxford University Press (https://library.usask.ca/copyright/authors-and-creators/re-using-figures.php).
Figure 2 Long description
The diagram illustrates various brain regions involved in the epileptogenic zone of temporal plus epilepsy. The temporal lobe is highlighted in blue, the orbitofrontal cortex in violet, the suprasylvian operculum in brown, the insula in red, and the temporo-parieto-occipital junction in green. Percentages indicate the involvement of each region in patients, with the temporal lobe at one hundred percent, the orbitofrontal cortex at one point two percent, the suprasylvian operculum at two point four percent, the insula at four point two percent, and the temporo-parieto-occipital junction at three percent. An inset figure shows a detailed view of the insula.
Seizure semiology and scalp video-EEG in temporal plus epilepsy (TPE) subgroups
Table 1 Long description
The table compares key features of temporo-frontal, temporo-perisylvian/insula, and temporo-parieto-occipital subgroups of TPE. It has five columns: Key features, Temporo-frontal, Temporo-perisylvian/insula, and Temporo-parieto-occipital. The rows detail various aspects such as onset, aura, impaired awareness, motor, autonomic, duration, and scalp V-EEG. For instance, the onset for temporo-frontal is often in sleep and in clusters, while for temporo-perisylvian/insula, it is often in sleep and may be reflex induced. The temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup has no data for onset. The aura for temporo-frontal includes none or nonspecific sensations, while temporo-perisylvian/insula includes gustatory, nausea, throat/laryngeal constriction, breathlessness, orofacial paresthesia, and painful paresthesia. The temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup includes vestibular, example rotation, vertigo, auditory, visual, and somatosensory auras. Impaired awareness involves focal seizures with and without impaired awareness for both temporo-frontal and temporo-parieto-occipital subgroups, while temporo-perisylvian/insula involves focal seizures with impaired awareness. Motor features for temporo-frontal include hypermotor seizures, complex motor behaviors, and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Temporo-perisylvian/insula includes facial or faciobrachial jerks with or without focal and/or bilateral generalized tonic-clonic seizures. There is no data for motor features in the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup. Autonomic features for temporo-frontal include urinary urge and possible changes in heart rate/respiratory rhythm. Temporo-perisylvian/insula includes hypersalivation, nausea, facial blush, sweaty hands, piloerection, changes in heart rate/respiratory rhythms, and urinary urge. Autonomic features are uncommon in the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup. Duration is relatively short for temporo-frontal, variable for temporo-perisylvian/insula, and no data for temporo-parieto-occipital. Scalp V-EEG for temporo-frontal includes ipsilateral frontal abnormalities, for temporo-perisylvian/insula includes ipsilateral temporal, temporo-frontal temporo-central, fronto-central interictal or ictal abnormalities rapidly spreading to the other side, and for temporo-parieto-occipital includes ipsilateral temporo-parietal interictal or ictal abnormalities.
V-EEG = video-electroencephalography; TPE = temporal plus epilepsy. Information from references 8, 11,14, 16–18. *No data: there was no information about these features in the references; **limited information. Please note: the distinctions between the subgroups are likely to be imprecise in clinical practice, reflecting inter-patient variations in the epileptogenic zones.
Seizure semiology
Children and the cognitively impaired may not be able to describe an aura or the onset. Both focal aware and impaired awareness seizures have been reported. Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14 The features described in the Table 1 should be considered as “red flags,” their sensitivity and specificity being unknown. Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9 Another potential “red flag” may be the occurrence of two distinct seizures types, one with features of TL origin and the other suggesting origin in an adjacent lobe (e.g., cases 1 and 5 in Bottan et al.). Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11 Postictally, dysphoria may be more common in TPE patients than in those with just TL involvement. Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9
The involvement of the insula-orbito-frontal or frontal-opercular regions in TPE may be associated with ictal changes in cardiac and respiratory rhythms and risk of unexpected death. Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti18
Scalp (video-) electroencephalographic features
Inter-ictal and ictal findings depend on the region(s) involved in the EZ (Table 1). Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14,Reference Barba, Minotti, Job and Kahane16,Reference Barba and Lenge17 Ictally, scalp EEG may suggest lateral temporal or extratemporal onset or early extratemporal spread. Reference Ryvlin and Kahane19
Neuroimaging
Brain MRI may be unremarkable in TPE but can show hippocampal sclerosis (HS), Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11 focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20 etc. Malformations of cortical development are particularly important associations in children. Reference Martire, Wong and Workewych13,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21
Techniques such as 3-D MP-RAGE (Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo) may help to differentiate between TPE and TLE. Reference Yin, Yan and Gao22
Positron emission tomography (PET) and other noninvasive investigations
In one study using PET, patients with TPE showed ipsilateral hypometabolism involving temporal and adjacent extratemporal structures. Reference Guedj, Bonini and Gavaret23 Sample sizes were inadequate to compare findings in patients with TPE with those who had mesial TLE (MTLE), neocortical TLE (NTLE) and bilateral TLE. Reference Guedj, Bonini and Gavaret23
In addition to video-EEG, MRI and PET, the evaluation of pharmacoresistant TPE (and other multilobar epilepsies) has included (in various combinations) the Wada test, functional MRI (fMRI), interictal and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI and MEG. Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6,Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10–Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14
Currently, the information on simultaneous EEG and fMRI (EEG-fMRI) is insufficient to opine on its role in the diagnosis and management of multilobar epilepsies. Reference Ikemoto, von Ellenrieder and Gotman24 On the basis of a single post hoc case report, Gong et al. suggested that multimodal and neurophysiological integration might be useful in the presurgical evaluation of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Reference Gong, Bickel and Tostaeva25
Neuropsychological testing and findings
Predominant dysfunction in aspects other than memory should raise suspicion for temporal neocortical or extratemporal involvement; fMRI may provide complementary information in TPE and other multilobar epilepsies. Multilobar epilepsies in children are associated with a high probability of cognitive impairment. Reference Moorhouse, Cornell and Gerstl26
Intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG)
IEEG can complement noninvasive evaluation in TPE and other multilobar epilepsies when surgical treatment is a consideration. Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27 In this situation, the individual patient-specific objectives include (1) differentiating between unifocal, lobar and multilobar epilepsies, especially when noninvasive data are ambiguous, (2) mapping the extent of the EZ and (3) delineating eloquent cortex. Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27 Further details on IEEG are beyond the scope of this communication.
TPE and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE)
Unrecognized TPE is an important cause of failures of standard anterior temporal lobectomy in MTLE. Reference Kahane, Isnard and Guénot4,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10 Clinical and scalp EEG features in TPE and MTLE may be similar, with seizures arising from juxtatemporal regions mimicking those arising from mesial temporal structures. Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11 Additionally, HS can be associated with both TPE and MTLE. Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11 Since the TL is always involved in the EZ of TPE, it is not surprising that TPE can mimic TLE, explaining why preoperatively unrecognized TPE is an important cause of TLE surgery failures. Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2–Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10 These observations lead to two inter-linked conclusions: (1) MTLS-HS may not be as specific an electro-clinical epilepsy syndrome as implied in the current ILAE classification, Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2,Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28 and (2) TPE must always be considered in the differential diagnosis of MTLE with or without HS. IEEG is often necessary to distinguish TPE from MTLE, especially when noninvasive data are inconclusive. Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27
Other multilobar epilepsies
Multilobar epilepsies other than TPE include (1) “orbitofrontal plus temporal polar” epilepsy Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6 and the less well characterized “frontal plus epilepsy”; Reference Rasmussen3 both may overlap with the temporo-frontal subgroup of TPE, and (2) “occipital plus” and “posterior cortex” epilepsies, Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Jacobs29 which may overlap with the temporo-parieto-occipital subgroup of TPE. Their onset is often in childhood. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5,Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6,Reference Jacobs29
Serletis et al. emphasized the importance of differentiating between “orbitofrontal plus frontal” (a “lobar” epilepsy) and “orbitofrontal plus temporal polar” epilepsy (a “multilobar” epilepsy); in their series, the former responded to tailored frontal lobar excision and the latter to tailored multilobar orbitofrontal and temporal polar resection. Reference Serletis, Bulacio, Alexopoulos, Najm, Bingaman and González-Martínez6
Etiologies
MRI and post-surgery specimens have shown the following associations with TPE and other multilobar epilepsies: HS, gliosis, cavernous angioma, abnormalities of cortical development including mild malformations of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE) tubers, perinatal and postnatal ischemic lesions, benign tumors, Sturge–Weber syndrome, etc. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21,Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28–Reference Sugano, Iimura and Suzuki30 Early childhood onset is frequently associated with FCDs. Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11–Reference Tsuboyama, Harini, Liu, Zhang and Bolton15,Reference Garganis, Kokkinos, Zountsas, Dinopoulos, Coras and Blümcke20,Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21,Reference Jacobs29
Gene defects and multilobar epilepsies
Multilobar epilepsies, including TPE, have been reported with mild malformations of cortical development and oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE) linked with brain somatic SLC35A2 mutations. Reference Najm, Lal and Alonso Vanegas21,Reference Barba, Blumcke and Winawer31 Temporo-parietal-occipital epilepsy occurred in a family with genetic epilepsy febrile seizures plus syndrome (GEFS+) associated with SCN1A mutation. Reference Riva, Coppola and Balagura32
Discussion
The information in the literature on TPE and other multilobar epilepsies is confounded by its retrospective nature, selection biases (most publications have been surgical series from resource-equipped epilepsy centers) and differing methodologies. Detailed descriptions of seizure types, evolution and frequency are scanty. In the case of TPE, ictal clinical and scalp EEG findings are almost exclusively focused on differentiating TPE from TLE. Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8–Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti10,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14 Our findings are not based on a systematic review; hence, potential for bias in the selection of the cited references is acknowledged. To the best of our knowledge, the ILAE reports referenced in this commentary Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2,Reference Jayakar, Gotman and Harvey27,Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28,Reference Fisher, Cross and D’Souza33 are based on consensus expert opinion and not on systematic reviews.
Notwithstanding these limitations, the clinical importance and several distinctive features of multilobar epilepsies such as TPE justify their inclusion in the three level ILAE classification of epilepsies and epilepsy syndromes (Figure 1). Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1,Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 Currently, focal epilepsy subtypes at the 2nd level of the classification “include unifocal and multifocal disorders as well as seizures involving one hemisphere.” Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1 These entities were not defined in the position paper. Reference Scheffer, Berkovic and Capovilla1
Fisher et al. did not mention or include “multifocal seizures” in their classification and description of seizure types (1st level of the current ILAE “Classification of the epilepsies”; Figure 1); Reference Fisher, Cross and D’Souza33 these authors defined focal seizures as “originating within networks limited to one hemisphere (italics ours). They may be discretely localized or more widely distributed”. Reference Fisher, Cross and D’Souza33 Multifocal seizures may arise from both hemispheres (e.g., epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures), Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 hence do not fit Fisher et al.’s definition of a focal seizure and therefore of a focal epilepsy. Reference Fisher, Cross and D’Souza33
However, multifocal seizures localized to one hemisphere can occur within lobar, multilobar or hemispheric distribution, thereby fulfilling Fisher et al.’s definition of a focal seizure. Reference Fisher, Cross and D’Souza33 Consequently, we suggest focal epilepsy subtypes (at the 2nd level) be classified as (i) unifocal: seizures originating from a discretely localized area of one hemisphere; (ii) lobar: seizures originating from one lobe in one hemisphere; (iii) multilobar: seizures originating from more than one lobe in one hemisphere; and (iv) hemispheric: seizures originating from much of one hemisphere. This classification would fit in with the long-standing anatomic-physiologic and clinical concepts of unifocal, lobar, multilobar and hemispheric involvement in the epilepsies and their corresponding tailored surgical treatment. Reference Rasmussen3,Reference Sarkis, Jehi, Najm, Kotagal and Bingaman5–Reference Kogias, Bast and Schubert-Bast7,Reference Kahane, Barba, Rheims, Job-Chapron, Minotti and Ryvlin9–Reference Bottan, Suller Marti and Parrent11,Reference Khoja, Albaradei and Alsulami14,Reference Barba, Rheims and Minotti18,Reference Yin, Yan and Gao22
Currently, epilepsy syndrome types are classified at the 3rd level as focal, focal and generalized, generalized and syndromes associated with developmental epileptic encephalopathy or progressive neurological deterioration (Figure 1). Reference Wirrell, Nabbout and Scheffer2 The clinical evidence summarized in this paper supports the inclusion of a category of multilobar epilepsy syndromes with TPE as a subtype. Although not discussed in detail in this paper, there is evidence to also consider “posterior cortex epilepsy,” Reference Riney, Bogacz and Somerville28 as a multilobar epilepsy syndrome subtype.
The overdue inclusion of multilobar epilepsies such as TPE in the ILAE classification should:
Promote their awareness, facilitating prompt recognition.
Catalyze prospective multicenter studies to better characterize their electro-clinical features.
Spur evidence-informed approaches to investigations, including criteria for selecting patients for IEEG and the specific IEEG modality of choice.
Stimulate evidence-based medical and surgical treatment.
Please note: We used the term “pharmacoresistant” rather than “drug-resistant” because several patients in the referenced series were treated with steroids, vitamin B6 and the ketogenic diet. The definition of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) used in this paper is from Barba et al. Reference Barba, Barbati, Minotti, Hoffmann and Kahane8.
Acknowledgments
SSS acknowledges the support of the Department of Pediatrics and College of Medicine, including that of Ms. Tova Dybig (research facilitator), and the Library services of the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Author contributions
SSS: concept, design, reference retrieval, drafting and revising. MPV: contributed to the contents and revisions and responsible for the table. GBY: contributed to concept, contents and revisions and co-ordinated input of co-authors. SMM: contributed to the contents and revisions. All authors approved the version for submission and agree to be accountable for all aspects of this paper.
Funding statement
None
Competing interests
SSS, MPV and BGY: none. SMM has received honorarium for speaking engagements for UCB Canada Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd (Canada) and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. He has been a member of the Epilepsy National Advisory Board for UCB Canada Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd (Canada), Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Paladin Labs Inc.