Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:28:59.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

06-03 What is the evidence that social cognition deficits in schizophrenia represent a vulnerability marker?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

C Loughland
C Loughland*
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Institute of Schizophrenia and Allied Disorders (NISAD), C/-Centre for Mental Health Studies, Newcastle, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2006, pp. 328
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

Patients with schizophrenia are observed to have marked deficits across several social cognition domains including theory of mind (TOM), social perception and emotion processing. These deficits are observed at illness onset (TOM, Polowsky et al. 2002) and across illness phase (TOM, Janssen et al. 2003), and differ in presentation from those observed in other diagnostic groups (eg depression, Garety & Freeman 1999; affective disorder, Loughland et al. 2002), suggesting they may represent a trait marker for the disorder. The aim of this paper was to review current findings with regard to social cognition deficits in schizophrenia and to examine the evidence that these deficits may represent a vulnerability marker.

Method:

A narrative review of the research literature was undertaken and supplemented with the current research findings of the author that investigate emotion-processing deficits in people with schizophrenia, first-degree relatives, affective disorder and healthy non-psychiatric controls.

Results:

Findings from TOM, social context and emotion processing provide evidence that healthy first-degree relatives and other at-risk groups show similar, but less severe, social cognition deficits to those observed in schizophrenia (Cornblatt & Keilp 1994; Frenkel et al. 1995; Toomey et al. 1999; Loughland et al. 2004).

Conclusions:

The results support the notion of a social cognition vulnerability marker for schizophrenia disorder. Differential patterns of performance on social cognition tasks may help detect those potentially at risk of developing schizophrenia and provide a potential method for developing endophenotypes for examining diagnostic, genetic and therapeutic issues in schizophrenia.