Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:02:20.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chlorophyta, Xanthophyceae and Cyanobacteria in Wright Valley, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2015

Phil M. Novis*
Affiliation:
Allan Herbarium, Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
Jackie Aislabie
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Susan Turner
Affiliation:
BioDiscovery NZ, 24 Balfour Rd, Parnell, Auckland, New Zealand
Malcolm McLeod
Affiliation:
Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wright Valley, Victoria Land contains numerous aquatic habitats suitable for the growth of algae in summer. Excepting diatoms and lichen phycobionts, algal diversity and distribution in the valley was documented. Using cultures and environmental cloning eight cyanobacterial and 14 eukaryotic species were revealed. The cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus and the chlorophycean Chlorococcum sp. 1 were the most common, both occurring in more than one habitat (ponds, soils or streams). Ponds harboured the most diverse communities. Habitat specialization was rare. Chlamydomonads were not found outside ponds, but species capable of zoospore production were able to colonize ponds and soils. Nostocalean cyanobacteria were not detected. Results suggest dispersal within and between valleys, with little evidence of Antarctic endemism. All but one cyanobacterium with similar internally transcribed spacer (ITS) length to clones from Miers Valley proved to be different species when 16S rRNA gene sequences were also considered; thus, ITS length is unreliable for assessing identity and biogeography of these cyanobacteria. Comparison with a 454 16S rRNA gene soil dataset from Wright Valley indicated the occurrence of only one of the cyanobacterial species, the distribution of which may be limited by salinity.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Map of Wright Valley, southern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Collection sites are shown and colour coded by the three site types (ponds, soils and streams). Inset map shows location within Antarctica. Site numbers correspond to those in Table I.

Figure 1

Table I Distribution of species reported from Wright Valley (arranged alphabetically). Site numbers correspond to those in Fig. 1. Sites producing no results are omitted. Collections from Lake Canopus (sites 24–26) are pooled.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 a.Chlamydomonas cf. micropapillata LCR-Ant35_2. b.Chlamydomonas cf. gloeophila LCR-Ant35_3. c.Chlamydomonas cf. gloeophila LCR-Ant24_1. d.Chlorococcum sp. 1 LCR-Ant9_2. e. & f.Chlorococcum sp. 1 LCR-Ant25_1. g.Chlorella cf. mirabilis LCR-Ant24_4. h. & i.Chlorella cf. mirabilis LCR-Ant27_3. j.Pseudopleurochloris sp. 1 LCR-Ant16_1. k.Chlorellidium tetrabotrys LCR-Ant26_3. l.Heterococcus conicus LCR-Ant7_1. m.Heterococcus conicus LCR-Ant10_2. n. & o.Heterococcus leptosiroides LCR-Ant29_2. Scales=10 µm (use scale in d. for l.–o. and in f. for a.–c., g.–i.). Abbreviations: aki=akinetes, auto=autospores, cv1/cv2=contractile vacuoles, dvc=dorsiventral curve, gc=giant cells, nsdc=non-spherical daughter cells, nuc=nucleus, pap=papilla, pyr=pyrenoid, stig=stigma, tw=thickened wall, zoo=zoospore.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Neighbour-joining tree constructed from rbcL sequences of Wright Valley eukaryotes. Corrected distances were generated using the Tamura–Nei model with gamma-distributed rate variation in MEGA version 6. Bootstrap support values are shown when >75%. Sequences contributed in this study are in bold.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 a.–c.Microcoleus vaginatus LCR-Cyant3a. d.–g.M. vaginatus LCR-Cyant10. h.–i.M. vaginatus LCR-Cyant11. j.–l.M. vaginatus LCR-Cyant30. m.–q.Leptolyngbya cf. foveolarum LCR-Cyant27; note necridic cells. r.–t.Leptolyngbya sp. 1 LCR-Cyant25. u.–w.Pseudanabaena cf. amphigranulata LCR-Cyant35. Scale=10 µm (use scale in k. for all). Abbreviations: aer=aerotopes, cal=calyptra, NC=necridic cells.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Neighbour-joining tree constructed from 16S rRNA gene sequences of Wright Valley cyanobacteria. Corrected distances were generated using the Kimura two-parameter model with gamma-distributed rate variation in MEGA version 6. Bootstrap support values are shown when >75%. Sequences contributed in this study are in bold. The lengths of 16S–23S internally transcribed spacer regions are shown in brackets. The tree is continued in Fig. 6.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Neighbour-joining tree constructed from 16S rRNA gene sequences of Wright Valley cyanobacteria (continued from Fig. 5). Corrected distances were generated using the Kimura two-parameter model with gamma-distributed rate variation in MEGA version 6. Bootstrap support values are shown when >75%. Sequences contributed in this study are in bold. The lengths of 16S–23S internally transcribed spacer regions are shown in brackets. Asterisks indicate clones from Miers Valley reported by Wood et al. (2008a). Arrows indicate the distribution of morphotypes named ‘Leptolyngbya foveolarum’.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Relationship between the occurrence of Microcoleus vaginatus in Wright Valley soils and the characteristics of the soils. Top row of plots are indicative of negative relationships; bottom row are not suggestive of any relationship. Abbreviations: CFU=colony forming units (heterotrophs), Distpos=distance from nearest site from which M. vaginatus was recorded during the algal survey (see Fig. 5), EC=electrical conductivity, DistVH=distance from valley head (i.e. distance down valley), WC=water content. Note the break in the dependent axis to accommodate the two outliers.

Supplementary material: PDF

Novis supplementary material

Novis supplementary material 1

Download Novis supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 531.5 KB