Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:21:16.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vivo response of Mesocestoides vogae to human insulin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2008

L. CANCLINI
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Section, Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of the Republic of Uruguay, Iguá 4225, 11400Montevideo, Uruguay
A. ESTEVES*
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Section, Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of the Republic of Uruguay, Iguá 4225, 11400Montevideo, Uruguay
*
*Corresponding author: Biochemistry Section, Faculty of Sciences, Iguá 4225, 11400Montevideo, Uruguay. Fax: +598 (2) 525 2095. E-mail: aesteves@fcien.edu.uy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Successful host invasion by parasitic helminths involves detection and appropriate response to a range of host-derived signals. Insulin signal response pathways are ancient and highly-conserved throughout the metazoans. However, very little is known about helminth insulin signalling and the potential role it may play in host-parasite interactions. The response of Mesocestoides vogae (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) larvae to human insulin was investigated, focusing on tyrosine-phosphorylation status, glucose content, survival and asexual reproduction rate. Parasite larvae were challenged with different levels of insulin for variable periods. The parameters tested were influenced by human insulin, and suggested a host-parasite molecular dialogue.†

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Measurement of glucose content in Mesocestoides vogae tetrathyridia. (▪) Reference group. (□) Challenged group. Data are expressed as glucose content (μg)/ mass of larvae (mg) versus concentration of hrINS (mU/ml). G, glucose content; W, Tt weight. Data shown are the mean±standard error of 30 independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05).

Figure 1

Table 1. Effect of hrINS on survival of Mesocestoides vogae tetrathyridia in culture(Tt were maintained in RPMI medium under the culture conditions indicated. The number of live parasites was counted at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 11 days. The numbers shown are the means of live Tt±standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05) for each group with respect to the RPMI plus 10% FCS group.)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Tyrosine-phosphorylation status in Mesocestoides vogae after hrINS treatment (1) without hrINS, (2) 0·002 mU/ml hrINS, (3) 0·2 mU/ml hrINS and (4) 20 mU/ml hrINS. (A) Western blot of Tt homogenates after treatment with hrINS for 15 min. Molecular mass is indicated in kDa. The arrow shows the signal of strong tyrosine-phosphorylation of a 77 kDa protein in a 0·2 mU/ml hrINS challenged group. The arrowhead shows the signal used as internal control in the quantitative analysis. (B) Graphical view of quantitative analysis. Data are expressed as relative intensity between the 77 kDa band (arrow) and the internal control band (arrowhead). Data shown are the mean±standard deviation of biological duplicates.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Alignment of VI-IX subdomains from tyrosine kinase domain insulin receptor sequences. MvIR: Mesocestoides vogae; Emir: Echinococcus multilocularis; SmIR1 and SmIR2: Schistosoma mansoni; DAF-2: Caenorhabditis elegans; DmIR: Drosophila melanogaster; HsIR: Homo sapiens. Dark grey shaded: identical amino acid residues between all sequences; light grey shaded: identical amino acid residues between MvIR and EmIR. Asterisk: tyrosine protein kinase specific signature sequence. Bold-underlined letters: crucial residues for tyrosine kinase activity. Bold letters: putative motif from tyrosine autophosphorylation in subdomain VI. Numbers at the right and left indicate position in the entire protein sequence of the first and last residue, respectively. Top lines indicate the length and number of each subdomain.