Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:12:25.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How do sheep affect plant communities and arthropod populations in temperate grasslands?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2011

A. Scohier
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
B. Dumont*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France

Abstract

Grasslands being used in sheep farming systems are managed under a variety of agricultural production, recreational and conservational objectives. Although sheep grazing is rarely considered the best method for delivering conservation objectives in seminatural temperate grasslands, the literature does not provide unequivocal evidence on the impact of sheep grazing on pasture biodiversity. Our aim was therefore to review evidence of the impacts of stocking rate, grazing period and soil fertility on plant communities and arthropod populations in both mesotrophic grasslands typical of agriculturally improved areas and in native plant communities. We therefore conducted a literature search of articles published up to the end of the year 2010 using ‘sheep’ and ‘grazing’ as keywords, together with variables describing grassland management, plant community structure or arthropod taxa. The filtering process led to the selection of 48 articles, with 42 included in the stocking rate dataset, 9 in the grazing period dataset and 10 in the soil fertility dataset. The meta-analysis did not reveal any significant trends for plant species richness or plant community evenness along a wide stocking rate gradient. However, we found frequent shifts in functional groups or plant species abundance that could be explained by the functional properties of the plants in the community. The meta-analysis confirmed that increasing soil fertility decreased plant species richness. Despite the very limited dataset, plant species richness was significantly greater in autumn-grazed pastures than in ungrazed areas, which suggests that choosing an appropriate grazing period would be a promising option for preserving biodiversity in sheep farming systems. Qualitative review indicated that low grazing intensity had positive effects on Orthoptera, Hemiptera (especially phytophagous Auchenorrhyncha) and, despite a diverse range of feeding strategies, for the species richness of Coleoptera. Lepidoptera, which were favoured by more abundant flowering plants, also benefited from low grazing intensities. Spider abundance and species richness were higher in ungrazed than in grazed pastures. In contrast, there are insufficient published studies to draw any firm conclusions on the benefits of late grazing or stopping fertilization on insect diversity, and no grounds for including any of this information in decision support tools at this stage.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012
Figure 0

Figure 1 Effect of stocking rate (stocki), expressed in livestock days per hectare (LU days per ha), on mean sward surface height (SSHi,j) in temperate grasslands. SSHi,j was expressed in cm, based on a nonlinear regression of the equation: SSHi,j = (19.6 + Si) exp (−0.0046.stocki); RMSE = 3.04; F1.32 = 13.29; P < 0.01. Data are from Keiller et al. (1995), Treweek et al. (1997), Dennis et al. (1998), Zhou et al. (2006), Scimone et al. (2007) and Mayer et al. (2009).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Effect of a stocking rate gradient, expressed in livestock days per hectare (LU days per ha), on plant species richness in temperate grasslands. Data are from Dutoit et al. (1995); Dennis et al. (1997), Treweek et al. (1997), Carvell (2002), Dorrough et al. (2004), Louault et al. (2005), Del Pozo et al. (2006), Zhou et al. (2006), Scimone et al. (2007), Gross et al. (2009), Marriott et al. (2009), Mayer et al. (2009), Meisser and Chatelain (2010) and Dumont et al. (2011).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Effect of a stocking rate gradient, expressed in livestock days per hectare (LU days per ha), on plant Shannon index in temperate grasslands. Data are from Dutoit et al. (1995), Dennis et al. (1997), Louault et al. (2005), Del Pozo et al. (2006), Zhou et al. (2006), Gross et al. (2009), Marriott et al. (2009) and Meisser and Chatelain (2010).

Figure 3

Table 1 Effect of decreasing SR on the species richness and abundance of Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Lepidoptera, Hemiptera and Aranea

Figure 4

Figure 4 Effect of grazing period on plant species richness in temperate grasslands. Grazing period was ‘early’ when there was spring grazing and ‘late’ when the first grazing period occurred during summer or autumn. Data were compared with ungrazed controls and continuously grazed (i.e. grazed for at least three seasons) pastures. Data are from Bullock et al. (2001), Dorrough et al. (2004) and Turner and Zimmer (2007).

Figure 5

Figure 5 Effect of soil fertility on plant species richness in temperate grasslands. ‘Poor’: poor or moderate soil fertility without any mineral fertilization; ‘Moderate’: rich soil fertility without mineral fertilization or moderately fertilized seminatural grasslands; ‘High’: rich soil fertility with high additional mineral fertilization. Data are from Fothergill et al. (2002), Maczey (2004), Norton et al. (2006), Fayolle (2008) and Marriott et al. (2009).