Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T21:06:08.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding preferences of Coptotermes heimi (Isoptera: Termitidae) under laboratory and field conditions for different commercial and non-commercial woods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2014

Khalid Zamir Rasib*
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Forman Christian College University, Lahore54600, Pakistan
Hina Ashraf
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Forman Christian College University, Lahore54600, Pakistan

Abstract

Coptotermes heimi (Wasmann) is a termite widely present throughout Pakistan and causes detrimental effects in standing trees. In this study, the feeding preferences of C. heimi for 18 different wood species were determined through choice and no-choice trials under laboratory and field conditions. In no-choice laboratory trials, different combinations of wood blocks were used to determine wood consumption by C. heimi. Weight loss, consumption/individual and survival rate were evaluated. Populus euramericana was found to be the most susceptible wood species and Syzygium cumini the most resistant one. Nine different wood combinations were used under choice laboratory conditions; maximum feeding was recorded in P. euramericana and Pinus roxburghii (50.8–24.5 mg). However, minimum feeding was recorded in S. cumini (2 mg) and Tectona grandis (14.9 mg). Under no-choice field conditions, minimum feeding was recorded in S. cumini (9.5 mg) and maximum feeding in P. euramericana (60.5 mg). Under choice field conditions, maximum (58 mg) feeding was recorded in P. euramericana and minimum feeding in S. cumini. Feeding preferences in descending order based on wood consumption as a quantitative parameter documented were as follows: P. euramericana>Ailanthus excelsa>Azadirachta indica>P. roxburghii>Butea monosperma>Morus alba>Bauhinia variegata>Albizia lebbeck>Dalbergia sissoo>Heterophragma adenophyllum>Erythrina suberosa>Cassia fistula>T. grandis>Mangifera indica>Eucalyptus camaldulensis>Jacaranda mimosifolia>Bambusa bamboo>S. cumini.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (colour online) Termite rearing/augmentation cages ((A)–(D)) showing the successful establishment of termite colonies under controlled conditions.

Figure 1

Table 1 Amount of mean wood consumption (mg) and wood consumption (%) in blocks of 18 different wood species exposed to the workers of Coptotermes heimi for 2 weeks under no-choice laboratory conditions

Figure 2

Table 2 Mean ($$\overline{X} $$±SD) wood consumption/mass loss (mg) in nine different wood pairs when exposed in combination to the workers of Coptotermes heimi for PE/PR (Populus euramericana and Pinus roxburghii), AE/MA (Ailanthus excelsa and Morus alba), DS/MI (Dalbergia sissoo and Mangifera indica), BV/AI (Bauhinia variegata and Azadirachta indica), ES/BM (Erythrina suberosa and Butea monosperma), CF/EC (Cassia fistula and Eucalyptus camaldulensis), AL/HA (Albizia lebbeck and Heterophragma adenophyllum), JM/BB (Jacaranda mimosifolia and Bambusa bamboo) and SC/TG (Syzygium cumini and Tectona grandis) in 2-week choice trials under laboratory conditions

Figure 3

Table 3 Mean survival percentage of the workers of Coptotermes heimi on nine different combinations of wood blocks in choice feeding laboratory trials after 14 days of exposure

Figure 4

Table 4 Mean consumption (mg) and percentage of consumption of 18 different timber species exposed to Coptotermes heimi in no-choice feeding bioassay after 2 weeks under field conditions

Figure 5

Fig. 2 (colour online) Range of damage caused by the workers of Coptotermes heimi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on blocks of 18 different wood species during no-choice bioassay in the field after 2 weeks.

Figure 6

Table 5 Mean ($$\overline{X} $$±SD) wood mass loss (in mg) in nine different wood pairs when exposed in combination to Coptotermes heimi for PE/PR (Populus euramericana and Pinus roxburghii), AE/MA (Ailanthus excelsa and Morus alba), DS/MI (Dalbergia sissoo and Mangifera indica), BV/AI (Bauhinia variegata and Azadirachta indica), ES/BM (Erythrina suberosa and Butea monosperma), CF/EC (Cassia fistula and Eucalyptus camaldulensis), AL/HA (Albizia lebbeck and Heterophragma adenophyllum), JM/BB (Jacaranda mimosifolia and Bambusa bamboo) and SC/TG (Syzygium cumini and Tectona grandis) in 2-week choice trials under field conditions

Figure 7

Fig. 3 (colour online) Feeding preferences and damage caused by the workers of Coptotermes heimi on different wood blocks when exposed in combination under choice field conditions after 2 weeks.