Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:52:20.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fretting wear behaviour in 6061-T6 aluminium alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

V. Erturun*
Affiliation:
Department of Airframes and Powerplants, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye
D. Odabas
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: V. Erturun; Email: erturun@erciyes.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, fretting wear in riveted lap joints of aluminium alloy plates was investigated. For the fretting test, 6061-T6 aluminium alloy plates, which are widely used in aircraft construction, and blind rivets were used. Experiments were carried out using a computer controlled Instron testing machine. Fretting surface roughness, microhardness was investigated by metallographic techniques and scanning electron microscopy.

Tensile load cycles in the riveted lap joint were found to cause damage to all surfaces. Two contact surfaces where friction occurs were investigated. The contact surface of the lower plate with the upper plate, and the contact surface of the lower plate with the rivet head. As load and cycles increased, fretting scars and surface roughness increased.

Consequently, it has been determined that fretting damages occur between the contact surface of the plates and between the plate and the rivet contact surface.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition of AA 6061-T6 alloys

Figure 1

Table 2. Mechanical properties of AA 6,061 T6 alloy

Figure 2

Figure 1. Cross-section of unloaded A4 blind rivet joint.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Image of lower plate contact surface with rivet head (load: 480 N, cycle: 6×104).

Figure 4

Figure 3. Variation of wear scar width with cycle.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Variation of rivet head contact surface roughness of upper plate with load.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Variation of the contact surface roughness of the upper plate with the lower plate with load.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Variation of the contact surface roughness of the upper plate with the lower plate with cycling.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Lower plate contact surface with rivet head (load: 480 N, cycle: 866,920).

Figure 9

Figure 8. a) Microhardness distribution of upper plate a contact surface with lower plate b) detail view (load: 480 N, number of cycles: 6×104).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Microhardness distribution of upper plate contact surface with rivet head (load: 480 N, number of cycles: 6×104).

Figure 11

Figure 10. Comparison of microhardness values of loaded and unloaded plates.

Figure 12

Figure 11. a) Image of lower plate with upper plate contact surface crack. b) Detail image (load: 480 n, cycle: 866,920).

Figure 13

Figure 12. a) Image of lower plate with upper plate contact surface crack. b) Detail image (load: 480 n, cycle: 866,920).