Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:40:08.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative phylogeography of two monogenean species (Mazocraeidae) on the host of chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus, along the coast of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2016

SHUAI YAN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China
MING WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China
CHAO-PIN YANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China
TING-TING ZHI
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China
CHRISTOPHER L. BROWN
Affiliation:
WorldFish, Bangladesh and South Asia, Benani, Dhaka, Bangladesh
TING-BAO YANG*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China
*
* Corresponding author: State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Center for Parasitic Organisms and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Improved Variety Reproduction of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China. E-mail: lssytb@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Summary

In the present paper, the phylogeographies of two monogenean species, Pseudokuhnia minor and Kuhnia scombri, on the same species of host, Scomber japonicus, were studied. Fragments of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene were sequenced for 264 individuals of P. minor and 224 individuals of K. scombri collected from 10 localities along the coast of China. Genetic diversity of K. scombri was higher than that of P. minor, which may imply that P. minor has a lower evolution rate and/or is a younger species. The neighbour-joining (NJ) trees of both parasites were comprised of two clades without association to sample sites, which is the signature of remixing populations following past division. Analyses of molecular variance and pairwise fixation index revealed different genetic structures for the populations of these two closely related species along the coast of China: P. minor without significant genetic structure, while K. scombri has some genetic differentiation. Both neutrality tests and mismatch distribution suggested that the populations of these two species of parasites experienced population expansion in the late Pleistocene era due to the glacial–interglacial cycles induced by climatic oscillations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map showing sample localities for Pseudokuhnia minor and Kuhnia scombri. Shaded areas indicate continental shelves that would have been exposed during periods of low sea level. HLD, Huludao; DD, Dandong; QD, Qingdao; RD, Rudong; TZ, Taizhou; XM, Xiamen; HZ, Huizhou; ZJ, Zhanjiang; BH, Beihai; SY, Sanya. This figure was modified after Liu et al. (2006).

Figure 1

Table 1. Sampling localities, grouped regions and descriptive statistics of genetic diversity of Pseudokuhnia minor

Figure 2

Table 2. Sampling localities, grouped regions and descriptive statistics of genetic diversity of Kuhnia scombri

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Neighbor-joining tree for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene haplotypes of Pseudokuhnia minor. Bootstrap supports of >80% are shown at nodes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (1000 replications) are provided for main clades in a bold font.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Median-joining network for COI haplotypes of Pseudokuhnia minor. The sizes of the circles are proportional to haplotype frequency and the colours represent the population (HLD, Huludao; DD, Dandong; QD, Qingdao; RD, Rudong; TZ, Taizhou; XM, Xiamen; HZ, Huizhou; ZJ, Zhanjiang; BH, Beihai; SY, Sanya) to which they belong; small hollow circles represent missing haplotypes.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. NJ tree for COI haplotypes of Kuhnia scombri. Bootstrap supports of >80% are shown at nodes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (1000 replications) are provided for main clades in a bold font.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. MJN for COI haplotypes of Kuhnia scombri. The sizes of the circles are proportional to haplotype frequency and the colours represent the population (HLD, Huludao; DD, Dandong; QD, Qingdao; RD, Rudong; TZ, Taizhou; XM, Xiamen; HZ, Huizhou; ZJ, Zhanjiang; BH, Beihai; SY, Sanya) to which they belong; small hollow circles represent missing haplotypes.

Figure 7

Table 3. Pairwise FST (below diagonal) and P values for exact test of population differentiation (above diagonal) among populations of Pseudokuhnia minor

Figure 8

Table 4. Pairwise FST (below diagonal) and P values for exact test of population differentiation (above diagonal) among populations of Kuhnia scombri

Figure 9

Table 5. Summary of hierarchical analysis of molecular variances for Pseudokuhnia minor and Kuhnia scombri

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Mismatch distribution of COI haplotypes for the two clades (Clades A and B) of Pseudokuhnia minor and two lineages (lineages A and B) of Kuhnia scombri. The observed pairwise differences are shown as bars and the expected values under the sudden expansion model are solid lines.

Figure 11

Table 6. Tajima's D, Fu's FS statistics, corresponding P values and mismatch distribution parameter estimates for each clade of Pseudokuhnia minor and Kuhnia scombri based on cytochrome c oxidase I sequence data