Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:58:59.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Altered neurophysiological parameters in an animal model of hyperactivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

TL Pitcher,
JR Wickens and
JNJ Reynolds
TL Pitcher
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
JR Wickens
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
JNJ Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2006, pp. 304
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is commonly used as an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-like behavioural characteristics. Little is known about the physiology of the SHR and its genetic control, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY). The aim of this research was to investigate the physiology of neurons in a brain area involved in movement initiation, the striatum.

Methods:

Male rats from the Wistar (WI), SHR and WKY strains were anaesthetized with urethane (1.8−2.4 g/kg). In vivo intracellular recordings were obtained using sharp microelectrodes from spiny projection neurons in the dorsal striatum. Cellular properties were measured from electrophysiological records of spontaneous activity and neuronal responses to in-tracellular current injection.

Results:

Recordings were made from 71 striatal spiny projection neurons (WI, n = 24; SHR, n = 24; WKY, n = 23). Most cellular properties were similar across the three rat strains. However, two parameters of action potential firing differed between the SHR and WKY strains. (Current evoked action potential amplitude: SHR 76.5 ± 7.5 mV, WKY 70.1 ± 8.7 mV; duration: SHR 0.60 ± 0.09 ms, WKY 0.67 ± 0.06 ms; P < 0.05 one-way ANOVA.) The cellular properties of the WI strain were intermediate and not significantly different to either SHR or WKY.

Conclusions:

The action potential parameter differences between the SHR and WKY strains may be related to the behavioural differences between the two strains. At the cellular level, this difference may also indicate that the two strains contain differences in membrane conductances in the striatal spiny projection neurons.