Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T08:20:46.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developmental programming of cardiovascular disease by prenatal hypoxia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2013

D. A. Giussani*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
S. T. Davidge
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Physiology, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
*
*Address for correspondence: Prof. D. A. Giussani, Department of Physiology, Development & Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK. (Email dag26@cam.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is now recognized that the quality of the fetal environment during early development is important in programming cardiovascular health and disease in later life. Fetal hypoxia is one of the most common consequences of complicated pregnancies worldwide. However, in contrast to the extensive research effort on pregnancy affected by maternal nutrition or maternal stress, the contribution of pregnancy affected by fetal chronic hypoxia to developmental programming is only recently becoming delineated and established. This review discusses the increasing body of evidence supporting the programming of cardiac susceptibility to ischaemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury, of endothelial dysfunction in peripheral resistance circulations, and of indices of the metabolic syndrome in adult offspring of hypoxic pregnancy. An additional focus of the review is the identification of plausible mechanisms and the implementation of maternal and early life interventions to protect against adverse programming.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Cardiovascular effects of chronic developmental hypoxia with and without maternal antioxidant treatment on fetal and adult offspring. Effects on fetuses at the end of gestation (top row): (a) individual examples of fetal aortic sections; (b) mean + s.e.m. of the fetal aortic wall-to-lumen area; (c) fetal aortic nitrotyrosine staining, index of peroxinitrite generation; (d) fetal cardiac expression of HSP70, index of cardiac stress. Effects on adult offspring at 4 months of age (bottom row): (e) dilator response to methacholine expressed as overall area under the curve (AUC) in isolated femoral arteries using in vitro wire myography. Black histogram represents the AUC of the NO component and white histograms of the NO-independent component; (f) myocardial contractility of isolated heart in Langendorff preparation; (g and h) chronotropic responsiveness to muscarinic and β1-agonists, respectively. Groups are all n = 8 for normoxia (N), hypoxia (H), hypoxia with vitamin C (HC) and normoxia with vitamin C (NC). * v. N or all; †H v. HC (P < 0.05, ANOVA). Modified from Giussani et al.99

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Effects of postnatal resveratrol treatment in young (3-month old) offspring exposed to prenatal hypoxia and a postnatal high fat diet. Effects on intra-abdominal fat and plasma lipids (a–e): (a) mean and ±s.e.m. of total intra-abdominal fat (g); (b) percent of intra-abdominal fat to total body fat; (c) plasma triacylglycerol (TG); (d) plasma free fatty acids (FFA); (e) representative images of abdominal fat deposition by CT scan 3D reconstruction. Effects on cardiac function (f–g): (f) cardiac performance during aerobic (pre-ischaemic) and after 10 min of no flow ischaemia (reperfusion); (g) average maximal cardiac power developed during the reperfusion period. Groups are all n = 6–10 for control (yellow), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)/prenatal hypoxia (blue), High fat (HF) – 45% fat (4.73 kcal/g), resveratrol (Resv – 4 g/kg of diet). *Represents a value of P < 0.05 for the respective main effects (IUGR or Resv) using two-way ANOVA. †P < 0.05 v. controls after a Bonferroni post hoc test comparing IUGR and control offspring receiving the same diet (n = 6 per group). Modified from Rueda-Clausen et al.97 and Dolinsky et al.111