Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:16:00.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research with Windshields for Precipitation Gages*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

C. C. Warnick
C. C. Warnick*
Affiliation:
Engineering Experiment Station, University of Idaho
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 2 , Issue 16 , 1954, pp. 387 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1954

In many regions of the western United States it is important to obtain precipitation records at high-altitude locations. This information is of primary importance in run-off forecasting to insure proper regulation and utilization of river flow and reservoir storage on irrigation projects and hydroelectric developments, as well as flood control works. Because most of the precipitation over the mountainous regions falls in the form of snow, the problem of obtaining a consistent measurement of precipitation is complicated by the action of wind. Deficient catch in gages exposed to winds and difficulty of maintaining the gages pointed up the need for a study which was begun in 5948 by the Engineering Experiment Station of the University of Idaho in cooperation with several federal agencies. The study has been concerned with the development and use of high-altitude precipitation gages and windshields for these gages.

Research work on this project has consisted of a laboratory study of scale models and shapes in a low-speed wind tunnel and field tests at two remote mountain locations. Fig. 1 (above) shows a liagram of the wind tunnel developed for making the investigations. In the wind tunnel air-flow patterns around and over various model gages were studied. Then the catching characteristics of model gages were tested under simulated snowstorm conditions using a fine sawdust for snow. Fig. 2 (p. 394) shows a gage with shield being tested, while Fig. 3 shows the adverse updrafts caused by winds as found by photographing a model unshielded gage during a simulated snowstorm. Special photographic techniques were used to evaluate theoretical true catch. Various types of shielding were tried on several different gages until a shield design was arrived at that gave an improved consistency of catch. The basic type of shielding tested was the hanging-baffle type, of which the Alter shield is typical. Other shapes and combinations, including the Nipher shield, were studied ; but the functional requirements in the case of measuring snowfall required that the shield enable the gage to be operative at all times and aid in freeing the gage from being capped over with rime and encrusted snow.

Fig. 1.

Schematic drawing of low-speed wind tunnel used to study model precipitation gages under simulated snow-storm conditions

Fig. 2.

Shielded model precipitation gage undergoing test in the wind tunnel. This particular gage is a 1/3-scale model of the roof and intake section of a new radio-reporting gage being developed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.] See text, p. 387

Fig. 3.

Close-up photograph of unshielded gage showing air-flow pattern with blowing sawdust. [Note updrafts on left side of gage and the nearly horizontal path of particles as they pass over the orifice.] See text, p. 387

Prototype gages, with and without windshields, of the types used in the wind tunnel were tested at remote mountain stations where records were kept of variations in catch, wind velocities and snow condition. Most of the gages used were of the storage type. A later phase of the work has dealt with a radio-reporting gage which uses a truncated intake tube projecting from the shelter house. Pilot installations of these gages are being investigated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in California.

Definite improvements in catch were obtained, working with models in the tunnel. Under a velocity of 20 m.p.h., unshielded gages caught about 30 per cent of the theoretical true catch while the gages equipped with the best shields caught over 70 per cent of the theoretical true catch. Photographs illustrating the improvement of air flow over the gages further illustrate the value of shielding precipitation gages (see Figs. 2 and 4). Results from field tests showed definitely greater catch in shielded gages, and the improvements were similar to those found in the wind tunnel but of less magnitude. Shielding requirements were found to vary with various types of gages. The larger the gage the greater the disturbance from wind and thus the need for larger shields. Development work has concentrated on making the shield more easily maintained and capable of keeping it and the gages free from encrusted snow.

Fig. 4

Close-up photograph of shielded gage showing air flow pattern with blowing sawdust. [Note continued downward trend of sawdust particles as they pass over the orifice.] See text, p. 388

Footnotes

*

Special Research Project No. 17, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Idaho, December 1953.

References

Short Bibliography

Alter, J. Cecil Shielded storage precipitation gages. Monthly Weather Review, Weather Bureau, Salt Lake City, Utah, No. 65, 1937, p. 262–65.Google Scholar
Bailey, Robert A. Nipher Alter and other shields on snow gages compared. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1947, p. 198–99.Google Scholar
Bastamoff, S. Withewitsch, W. J. Les spectres aerodynamiques des pluviomètres. Bulletin of the Institute of Geophysical Research, No. 10, Moscow, U.S.S.R., 1926.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. F. Need for universal standards for measuring precipitation, snowfall, and snow cover. Union Internationale de Géodésie et de Geophysique, Association Internationale d’Hydrólogie Scientifique. Assemblée Générale ci Edimbourg, 1936, Bulletin No. 23, Riga [1938], p. 7–58 (with large annotated bibliography).Google Scholar
Doremus, John A. Radio active snow gage with telemetering system. Roneographed by the Department of Mechanics and Electronics Division, Motorola Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kerr, T. B. Developing and testing a new windshield for precipitation gages. The Idaho Engineer, Vol. 30, No. 4, May 1953.Google Scholar
Krein, T. P. Model testing of precipitation gages. The Idaho Engineer, Vol. 29, No. 3, April 1952.Google Scholar
Larkin, H. H. Jr. A comparison of the Alter and Nipher windshields for precipitation gages. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1947, p. 200–01.Google Scholar
Leeman, Walter. Der Totalisator. Die Alpen, Vol. 22, 1946, p. 205–08.Google Scholar
Linsley, R. K. Kohler, M. A. Pauhlus, J. L. H., in Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, p. 66 et seq.Google Scholar
Long, Thomas L. A comparison of snowfall catch in shielded and unshielded precipitation gages. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1947, p. 151–53.Google Scholar
Lütschg, O. Der Kugelniederschlagsmesser Haas-Lütschg. Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. 50, Ht. 2–4, 1937, p. 423–44.Google Scholar
Mercanton, P. L. La mesure correcte des precipitations atmospheriques. La Météorologie, 1937, p. 136–39.Google Scholar
Nipher, F. E. On the determination of the true rainfall, by elevated gages. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, St. Louis, 1878, p. 103–08.Google Scholar
Sanuki, M. Tsuda, N. Kimura, S. Water tank and wind tunnel tests on rain gauge windshield. Meteorological Research Institute, Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics, Vol. III, No. 1, Tokyo, March 1952.Google Scholar
Warnick, C. C. Laboratory and field experiments with snow gages in Idaho. Proceedings of the Western Snow Conference, Victoria, B.C., April 19–20, 1951. Nineteenth Annual Meeting (pub. 1950, p. 57–68.Google Scholar
Warnick, C. C. Experiments with windshields for precipitation gages. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 34, No. 3, June 1953.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Schematic drawing of low-speed wind tunnel used to study model precipitation gages under simulated snow-storm conditions

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Shielded model precipitation gage undergoing test in the wind tunnel. This particular gage is a 1/3-scale model of the roof and intake section of a new radio-reporting gage being developed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.] See text, p. 387

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Close-up photograph of unshielded gage showing air-flow pattern with blowing sawdust. [Note updrafts on left side of gage and the nearly horizontal path of particles as they pass over the orifice.] See text, p. 387

Figure 3

Fig. 4Close-up photograph of shielded gage showing air flow pattern with blowing sawdust. [Note continued downward trend of sawdust particles as they pass over the orifice.] See text, p. 388