Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:10:34.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new marine flatworm (Plathelminthes: Rhabditophora: Otoplanidae) from the Ligurian coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. Lanfranchi  and
M. Melai
A. Lanfranchi*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy
M. Melai
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Lanfranchi, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy email: alanfranchi@biologia.unipi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The morphology and taxonomy of a new species of otoplanid (Plathelminthes: Rhabditophora: Proseriata) is discussed. Otoplana proxima sp. nov., collected at Marina di Bibbona (Livorno), presents the typical morphological peculiarities of the subfamily Otoplaninae, but clearly differs from the previously described species with regard to the organization of the genital organs. The new flatworm appears more similar to Otoplana intermedia, but differs sharply in its body length and male copulatory organ made up of 23–24 pliable spines (42–70 μm long) characterized by a forked tip and a canaliculated proximal end.

Keywords

taxonomymarine biodiversityOtoplanidaenew speciesmale copulatory organflatwormsmeiofaunaspines

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 423 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

INTRODUCTION

The family Otoplanidae (Plathelminthes: Rhabditophora: Proseriata) is represented by a group of typically marine flatworms inhabiting the sandy-breaker zone of sea coasts known as the ‘Otoplanen-Zone’ of Remane (Reference Remane1933). This group of neoophoran Plathelminthes is the dominant taxon in the surf-zone, where it moves rapidly among the sand grains. Behaviour and reproduction are quite obscure; recently, new findings (Lanfranchi & Melai, Reference Lanfranchi and Melai2008) suggest that these animals cross the sandy layers driven by two primordial instincts. The quiet deeper layers are those where the Otoplanidae take refuge to lay eggs and probably to rest and escape predators. The superficial sand is presumably the zone where they mate and search for food.

Otoplanidae species have been collected in different globe zones:

  1. (1) Seawater:

  2. (2) Brackish and fresh water:

The aim of the present study is to gain extensive knowledge of the mesopsammic fauna concerning the family Otoplanidae.

The new species Otoplana proxima is attributed to the subfamily Otoplaninae on the basis of its partially ciliate body, its ciliate creeping sole and above all its cylindrical pharynx situated horizontally along the ventral body zone. Moreover, it possesses a male genital pore for discharging surplus spermatozoa, typical of the genus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The specimens were collected in May 2005 at Marina di Bibbona (Leghorn, Italy), 43°14′13″N 10°31′36″E, where the ‘Otoplanen-Zone’ is characterized by fine sand, by scooping up the superficial layer of sediment. The meteorological conditions were optimal with a temperature of 28–29°C, a calm sea and a light breeze.

Each organism was first anaesthetized with a solution of 1/3 of MgCl2 21% and 2/3 tap water. Subsequently, at least 30 specimens were studied in vivo by slight squeezing under the coverslip, in order to draw the habitus with the aid of the camera lucida. Finally, by compressing the coverslip more forcefully, the spines of the sclerotic apparatus were examined.

For histological procedures, five specimens were fixed in Stieve solution. The sections were stained with Heidenhain's haematoxylin, using eosin as counterstain.

A graphical elaboration was used to support the microscopic study.

TAXONOMY

SYSTEMATICS
Phylum PLATHELMINTHES Schneider, Reference Schneider1873
Class RHABDITOPHORA Ehlers, Reference Ehlers1984
Family OTOPLANIDAE Hallez, Reference Hallez1892
Subfamily OTOPLANINAE Hallez Reference Hallez1910
Genus Otoplana Du Plessis, Reference Du Plessis1889
Otoplana proxima sp. nov.

TYPE MATERIAL

At least 15 specimens were studied in vivo, including drawings and photographs. Three specimens were fixed and sectioned.

Holotype: one sagittally-sectioned specimen is deposited in the Electron Microscopy Laboratory Collection of the Dipartimento di Biologia, Unità di Etologia (Università di Pisa).

DIAGNOSIS

Sexually mature organism measures about 5 mm in length. The body is fusiform, dorsally convex, ventrally flat, colourless and transparent (Figures 1, 2, 3 & 6).

Fig. 1.

Habitus of Otoplana proxima sp. nov.: amp, accessory male pore; ap, adhesive papillae; b, brain; esv, external seminal vesicles; gc, glandular complex; ge, germaries; i, intestine; s, sclerotic apparatus; sta, statocyst; tb, tactile bristles or ‘Tastborsten’; te, testes; th, tactile hairs; vg, vesicula granulorum; vi, vitellaries; ph, pharynx; vs, vesicula seminalis.

Figs 2–8.

Photographs of Otoplana proxima sp. nov. in vivo: 2, 3 and 6 living animals; 4 anterior end; 5 posterior end; 7 post-pharyngeal zone; 8 pre-pharyngeal zone with glandular complex and testes.

The anterior end is marked by two couples of robust tactile bristles or ‘Tastborsten’ (tb) retractable into the respective wide pockets. Tactile hairs (th) are present on the lateral and especially frontal sides (Figures 1, 2 & 4).

The rabdoids are present as true rhabdites, grouped into longitudinal lines along the body, with the exception of the anterior end, where they are randomly scattered.

Characteristic glandular complexes (gc), constituted of 5–8 structural units are present on the ventral and dorsal surfaces, generally distributed along a few longitudinal rows (Figures 1 & 8).

The ovoidal brain is at some distance from the small statocyst (sta) (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 & 6).

The testes (te), starting not far from the brain, consist of two series of small follicles along the longitudinal axis. They are numerous and reach the two germaries (ge) at about 2/3 of body length (Figures 1, 2, 3 & 6).

Two rows of small vitellaries (vi) are present laterally to the testes. They begin abreast of the testis follicles and reach the pharynx opening maintaining a regular distribution (Figures 1, 2 & 3).

Two germaries (ge) are present in front of the pharynx, posteriorly to the last testis follicles, at 2/3 of body length. They are globoid, larger than the testes and vitellaries, and contain numerous egg-cells (Figure 1).

The pharynx (ph) shows the so-called bell-shaped organization or ‘Glöckchen’, typical of the genus. The sacciform intestine (i) is a caecum at both ends (Figure 1).

In the postpharyngeal zone, the sacciform vesicula seminalis (vs) is connected distally with a relatively large vesicula granulorum (vg). The external seminal vesicles (esv) and the accessory male pore (amp), typical of the genus, are clearly visible (Figures 1 & 7).

The caudal end is characterized by a tiny plate and provided with a few small adhesive papillae (ap). These bi-glandular structures are also present in the lateral epidermis (Figures 1, 2 & 5).

The male copulatory organ is characterized by a sclerotic apparatus (s) with 23–24 spines of variable shape and length (Figures 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13):

  • • one couple (a) of specular spines, practically straight, 42 µm long, placed in the centre of the complex, with a rounded proximal end and a forked tip bent medially;

  • • one couple (b), similar and external to the previous, 44 µm long;

  • • 19–20 spines (c) distally curved outwards, equally subdivided along both sides, 63–70 µm long, with a more or less forked distal end.

Figs 9–13.

Photographs (9–11), tracing (12) and spatial distribution (13) of the spines of male sclerotic apparatus of Otoplana proxima sp. nov.: a, b and c, groupings of similar spines.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

As reported in the literature (Lanfranchi & Melai, Reference Lanfranchi and Melai2007), there are at present four known species in the genus Otoplana: O. intermedia Du Plessis, Reference Du Plessis1889 (Ax, Reference Ax1956) collected in the Ligurian and Tyrrhenian Seas, O. bosporana Ax, Reference Ax1959 sampled in the Bosphorus (Black Sea), O. truncaspina Lanfranchi, Reference Lanfranchi1969 discovered at Monte Rosso al Mare (Ligurian Sea) and O. oxyspina Lanfranchi & Melai, Reference Lanfranchi and Melai2007 collected at Caletta Beach (Ligurian Sea). With the addition of O. proxima, the effective species of the taxon Otoplana amount to five.

The habitus of our species evidences a body length (5 mm) shorter than in O. intermedia (8 mm) and longer than in O. bosporana (2.5–3 mm) and O. oxyspina (3.3–4 mm). Otoplana truncaspina presents a body length of 4.5–5 mm, similar to that observed in O. proxima.

The organization of the cephalic zone and the distribution of the rhabdithes show similarity with the previously described species.

The pharynx, located in the end of the second body half, is characteristic of the subfamily.

The yolk follicle path, in a single longitudinal row from the anterior end to the pharynx opening on each side of the body, is similar to that observed in O. intermedia, although the follicle dimensions are smaller.

The position of the testes, as well as their extension, is shared with all the species of the genus. The dimensions and distribution not in single line of the testes in our species correspond to those of O. intermedia and O. truncaspina.

In O. proxima the locations of the vesicula seminalis, vesicula granulorum and penis papilla appear to coincide with that of the species already described.

The spines of the male copulatory organ of the new species display a different organization from that of all the other species. Furthermore, all the bristles appear more pliable distally and canaliculated proximally.

The total number of bristles (23–24) observed in the new species is lower than that of O. bosporana (30–33) and slightly higher than that of O. oxyspina (21). Otoplana intermedia and O. truncaspina present respectively 24 and 23 spines, similarly to O. proxima.

The position of the (a) couple of spines in the central zone is compatible with that of the small bristles of O. oxyspina and O. truncaspina. This couple possesses a clearly forked tip and it is longer (42 µm) than that of O. oxyspina (36 µm) and O. truncaspina (28–36 µm).

The new species does not present the ‘Medianstachel’ described in O. oxyspina, O. bosporana and O. truncaspina. On the contrary, it is similar to O. intermedia, which is free of the funnel-shaped sting.

The presence of the (b) couple on both sides of the (a) spines is a peculiar character of O. proxima. This couple is absent in all the other species. Its length (44 µm) is compatible only with that of some bristles of O. bosporana ranging from 33–59 µm. The spines of the other species are longer.

The (c) bristles, with a forked tip, a curved axis and a canaliculated proximal end, bear a closer resemblance to (d) type of O. oxyspina and O. intermedia. Their length (63–70 µm) is similar to that of O. oxyspina (58–65 µm) and O. truncaspina (60–66 µm). Otoplana intermedia shows spines longer (80–90 µm), while those of O. bosporana are shorter (33–59 µm).

On the basis of the data presented, we conclude that our species differs clearly from the species already described. As far as habitus, distribution of testes and vitellaries, and pharynx position are concerned, the more similar species is O. intermedia. The body length of O. proxima is comparable to that of O. truncaspina, and its sclerotic apparatus is devoid of ‘Medianstachel’ like O. intermedia, which is also lacking in the central spine couple. The pliable spines of the new species are particular for their canaliculated proximal end. These dissimilarities allow the constitution of a new valid species of otoplanid.

References

REFERENCES

An der Lan, H. (1964) Zur Turbellarien-Fauna der Donau. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 27 (Supplement), 3–27.Google Scholar
Ax, P. (1951) Die Turbellarien des Eulitorals der Kieler Bucht. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung für Systematik 80, 277–378.Google Scholar
Ax, P. (1956) Monographie der Otoplanidae (Turbellaria): Morphologie und Systematik. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der literatur Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen klasse 13, 159–278.Google Scholar
Ax, P. (1959) Zur Systematik, Ökologie und Tiergeographie der Turbellarienfauna in den Ponto-kaspichen Brackwassermeeren. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 87, 71–89.Google Scholar
Ax, P. and Armonies, W. (1990) Brackish water Plathelminthes from Alaska as evidence for the existence of boreal brackish water community with circumpolar distribution. Microfauna Marina 6, 7–109.Google Scholar
Ax, P. and Ax, R. (1967) Turbellaria Proseriata von der Pazifikküste der USA (Washington). Zoologische Morphologie Tiere 61, 215–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ax, P. and Ax, R. (1974) Interstitielle Fauna von Galapagos V. Otoplanidae (Turbellaria, Proseriata). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 27, 573–598.Google Scholar
Ax, P. and Sopott-Ehlers, B. (1987) Otoplanidae (Plathelminthes, Proseriata) von Bermuda. Microfauna Marina 3, 261–281.Google Scholar
Ax, P., Sopott-Ehlers, B. and Weidemann, E. (1978) Zur morphologie sublitoraler Otoplanidae (Turbellaria, Proseriata) von Helgoland und Neapel. Zoomorphologie 90, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calandruccio, S. (1897) Anatomia e sistematica di due specie nuove di Turbellaria. Atti dell'Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali di Catania. Series 4, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Delogu, V. and Curini-Galletti, M. (2007) News species of the genus Parotoplana Meixner, 1938 (Proseriata, Otoplanidae) from southern Apulia (Italy). Zootaxa 1529, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delogu, V., Casu, M. and Curini-Galletti, M. (2008) The genera Parotoplana Meixner, 1938 and Parotoplanella Ax, 1956 (Platyhelminthes: Proseriata) in southern Spain. Journal of Natural History, 42, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, G. (1889) Note sur l’Otoplana intermedia. Zoologische Anzeiger 12, 339–342.Google Scholar
Ehlers, U. (1984) Phylogenetisches System der Plathalminthes. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg (NF) 27, 291–294.Google Scholar
Giard, M.A. (1904) Sur une faunule caractéristique des sables à Diatomées d'Ambleteuse (Pas-de-Calalis) III. Les Gastrotriches aberrants. Comptes Rendus de Sciences. Société de Biologie 56, 1063–1065.Google Scholar
Gieysztor, M. (1938) Über einige Turbellarien aus dem Süβwasserpsammon. Archiv für Hydrobiologie und Ichtyologie 11, 364–382.Google Scholar
Graff von, L. (1913) Turbellaria II. Rhabdocoelida. Tierreich 35, 449–452.Google Scholar
Hallez, P. (1892) Classification des Triclades. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 17, 106–109.Google Scholar
Hallez, P. (1910) Un nouveau type d'Alloicoele (Bothriomolus constrictus n. g. n. sp.). Archive de Zoologique Expérimental et Général 3, 611–664.Google Scholar
Karling, T.G. (1964) Marine Turbellaria from the Pacific coast of North America (III) Otoplanidae. Arkiv för Zoologi 16, 527–541.Google Scholar
Karling, T.G. (1973) Anatomy and taxonomy of a new Otoplanid (Turbellaria, Proseriata) from South Georgia. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 16, 262–269.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, A. (1969) Nuovi Otoplanidi (Turbellaria, Proseriata) delle coste della Liguria e della Toscana. Bollettino di Zoologia 36, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfranchi, A. (1978) Morphology and taxonomy of two new Otoplanids (Turbellaria, Proseriata) from the Ligurian Sea. Zoologica Scripta 7, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfranchi, A. and Melai, M. (2007) Morphology and taxonomy of a new species of Otoplanid (Plathelminthes, Rhabditophora, Proseriata) from the Ligurian Sea. Italian Journal of Zoology 74, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfranchi, A. and Melai, M. (2008) Parotoplana rosignana sp. nov.: morphology, taxonomy and post-embryonal development of a new species of otoplanid (Plathelminthes, Rhabditophora, Proseriata). Italian Journal of Zoology 75, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, A. (1960) Die Turbellarien Ostfennoskandiens. I. Acoela, Catenulida, Macrostomida, Lecithoepiteliata, Prolecithophora und Proseriata. Fauna Fennica 7, 1–155.Google Scholar
Marcus, E. (1949) Turbellaria Brasileiros (7). Boletins de Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras. Universidade de Sâo Paulo. Zoologia 14, 7–156.Google Scholar
Marcus, E. (1950) Turbellaria Brasileiros (8). Boletins de Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras. Universidade de Sâo Paulo. Zoologia 15, 5–192.Google Scholar
Marcus, E. (1952) Turbellaria Brasileiros (10). Boletins de Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras. Universidade de Sâo Paulo. Zoologia 17, 5–188.Google Scholar
Martens, P.M. and Schockaert, E.R. (1981) Sand dwelling Turbellaria from the Netherlands Delta area. Hydrobiologia 84, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meixner, J. (1938) Turbellaria (Strudelwürmer) I. In Grimpe, G. and Wagler, E. (eds) Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, Teil IVb. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 1–146.Google Scholar
Miller, W. and Faubel, A. (2003) Six new species of Proseriata (Plathelminthes) from eastern Australia. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 100, 27–57.Google Scholar
Noreña, C., Damborenea, C. and Brusa, F. (2005) New freshwater interstitial Otoplanidae (Platyhelminthes: Proseriata) from the Paraná and Uruguay rivers, South America. Journal of Natural History 39, 1457–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remane, A. (1933) Verteilung und Organisation der benthonischen Mikrofauna der Kieler Bucht. Wissenschaftlich Meeresuntersuchungen (N.F.), Abteilung Kiel 21, 161–221.Google Scholar
Riemann, F. (1965) Turbellaria Proseriata mariner Herkunft aus Sanden der Flubsohle im limnischen Bereich der Elbe. Zoologische Anzeiger 174, 299–312.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1873) Untersuchungen über Plathelminthen. Separatabdruck aus d. 14. Jahresbericht Oberhessen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Heilkunde Giessen 14, 1–78, Tables 3–7.Google Scholar
Sopott-Ehlers, B. (1972) Systematik und Ökologie von Proseriaten (Turbellaria) der deutschen Nordseekuste. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 13, 221–229.Google Scholar
Sopott-Ehlers, B. (1976) Interstitielle Macrostomida und Proseriata (Turbellaria) von der französichen Atlantikkuste und den kanarischen Inseln. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 60, 558–568.Google Scholar
Sopott-Ehlers, B. (1985) Zwei neue Proseriata (Platyhelminthes) von der französischen Atlantikküste. Microfauna Marina 2, 380–396.Google Scholar
Sopott-Ehlers, B. and Ehlers, U. (1980) Zur Systematik und geographischen Verbreitung interstieller Turbellarien der kanarischen Inseln. Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 80, 585.Google Scholar
Steinböck, O. (1931) Marine Turbellaria. Zoology of the Faroe 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
Steinböck, O. (1932) Die Turbellarien des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica 6, S295–S342.Google Scholar
Tajika, K.I. (1983a) Zwei neue interstitielle Turbellarien der Gattung Archotoplana (Proseriata, Otoplanidae) aus Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Sciences Hokkaido University Series 6 Zoology 23, 179–194.Google Scholar
Tajika, K.I. (1983b) Zwei neue Otoplaniden (Turbellaria, Proseriata) aus Hokkaido, Japan. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 56, 100–110.Google Scholar
Tajika, K.I. (1983c) Zur Kenntnis Gattung Notocaryoplana Steinböck, 1935 (Turbellaria, Proseriata, Otoplanidae). Bulletin of the National Science Museum Series A (Zoology) 9, 97–104.Google Scholar
Tajika, K.I. (1984) Eine neue Art der Gattung Itaspiella Ax, 1956 (Turbellaria, Proseriata, Otoplanidae) aus Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Liberal Arts and Science Course Nimon University School of Medicine 12, 25–33.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Habitus of Otoplana proxima sp. nov.: amp, accessory male pore; ap, adhesive papillae; b, brain; esv, external seminal vesicles; gc, glandular complex; ge, germaries; i, intestine; s, sclerotic apparatus; sta, statocyst; tb, tactile bristles or ‘Tastborsten’; te, testes; th, tactile hairs; vg, vesicula granulorum; vi, vitellaries; ph, pharynx; vs, vesicula seminalis.

Figure 1

Figs 2–8. Photographs of Otoplana proxima sp. nov. in vivo: 2, 3 and 6 living animals; 4 anterior end; 5 posterior end; 7 post-pharyngeal zone; 8 pre-pharyngeal zone with glandular complex and testes.

Figure 2

Figs 9–13. Photographs (9–11), tracing (12) and spatial distribution (13) of the spines of male sclerotic apparatus of Otoplana proxima sp. nov.: a, b and c, groupings of similar spines.