Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:40:34.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wide stopband bandpass filter based on variety of dielectric waveguide resonators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2025

Ke-Lan Li
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Wei Huang
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Wei Qin*
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Jian-Xin Chen
Affiliation:
School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong, China
*
Corresponding author: Wei Qin; Email: waiky.w.qin@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a dielectric waveguide bandpass filter (BPF) with good stopband suppression based on different kinds of dielectric waveguide resonators (DWRs). Three distinct types of DWRs are modified from the traditional rectangular DWR, i.e., one with a metallized blind hole, one with a metallized U-shaped slot and another one with a pair of parallel ridges. These resonators are designed that their fundamental mode frequencies are basically the same and their higher-order modes are staggered. As a result, the higher-order modes can be suppressed to a certain extent when conducting BPF designs. For verification, a sixth-order BPF with an operating frequency band ranging from 3.4 to 3.5 GHz is designed, fabricated and measured. It is composed of the above three distinct types of DWRs, with a deliberate arrangement that prevents the DWRs of the same type from being adjacent to each other, guaranteeing that the harmonics are well suppressed. In measurement, the in-band return loss is better than 12 dB, the minimum in-band insertion loss is about 1.0 dB. Besides, the 20 dB out-of-band suppression reaches 6.9 GHz, which is almost twice the center frequency.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Figure 1. 3D structures of the three DWRs and the electric field distributions of their corresponding TM110 mode: (a) structure and (b) field of the DWR with metalized blind hole (Resonator A); (c) structure and (d) field of the DWR with metalized U-shaped slot (Resonator B); (e) structure and (f) field of the DWR with dual parallel ridges (Resonator C).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The effects of physical parameters on frs and Qus of the fundamental modes of the three DWRs: (a) fr versus 2ra, 2wm, or wu; (b) fr versus ha, hm, or hu; (c) Qu versus 2ra, 2wm, or wu; and (d) Qu versus ha, hm, or hu.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Frequency distributions for the first five modes of the three DWRs.

Figure 3

Table 1. Resonant frequencies of the first five modes for the three DWRs

Figure 4

Figure 4. Structure of the proposed DWR BPF. (Key physical parameters (unit: mm) are w = l = 11.1, h = 5.8, L1 = 5.85, L2 = 5.6, L3 = 5.45, W1 = 1.35, W2 = 1.45, W3 = 1.2, hkd = 0.9, wp = 28.1, lp = 90.1, hp = 0.813, and lf = 13.).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Coupling topology of the proposed DWR BPF.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Extracted Qe versus hkd.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Extracted coupling coefficients k12, k34, and k56 versus L1, L2, and L3, respectively.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Simulation results and structure of the proposed DWR BPF without TZs.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Simulation and coupling matrix results of S-parameters.

Figure 10

Figure 10. The influence of feeding microstrip line length lf on TZs.

Figure 11

Figure 11. The improved coupling topology of the proposed DWR BPF.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Photographs of the fabricated DWR BPF: (a) top of the dielectric part, (b) bottom of the dielectric part, (c) top view of the assembled BPF, (d) bottom view of the assembled BPF, and (e) side view of the assembled BPF.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Simulated and measured results of the proposed DWR BPF: (a) narrow-band view and (b) wideband view.

Figure 14

Figure 14. The influence of different parameter variables on the filter insertion loss: (a) conductivity σ; (b) surface roughness Rq; (c) loss tangent tan δ.

Figure 15

Table 2. Comparisons with previous prototypes