Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T23:47:19.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical Modelling of Realistic Ice Floes in Ocean Waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vernon A. Squire*
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1 ER, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results from a numerical model for the computation of ice-floe motions in ocean waves are presented and discussed for floes of various sectional shapes. It is shown that the beam-to-draft ratio is a crucial factor in determining the behaviour of each floe, and that ridges and keels can substantially affect the roll and sway characteristics, particularly for thick floes. Undercuts beneath floes appear to have little effect, but a protruding sill can lead to decreased motion at certain frequencies and a reduced capability for making waves. As the underwater character of an ice floe cannot easily be measured, it is necessary to infer draft from freeboard estimates using the method proposed by Ackley and others (1976). Although most of this paper is concerned with rigid body motions, a brief account is included of a modification to the model which allows each floe to bend on the passing wave. By this means, wave-induced flexure is discussed for floes of non-simple underwater shape.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1983
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Regions of validity of Morison’s equation and potential theory. Wave amplitude: a, floe beam (diameter): 2b, wavelength: λ (after Garrison 1979).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of floe showing coordinate axes and discretization scheme used in model, and defining the in-plane bodily motions.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. RAO in heave at beam-to-draft ratios of П=2, 3, 10, 30, 100. Non-dimensional wavelength: λ/b, gain factor is the amplitude of heaving motion of the floe/amplitude of forcing wave.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. RAO in roll at beam-to-draft ratios of Π=2, 3, 10, 30, 100. Non-dimensional wavelength: λ/b, gain factor is the amplitude of rolling motion of the floe/amplitude of forcing wave.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. RAO in sway at beam-to-draft ratios of Π=2, 3, 10, 30, 100. Non-dimensional wavelength: λ/b, gain factor is the amplitude of swaying motion of the floe/amplitude of forcing wave.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. RAO for heave, roll and sway motions of an ice floe with Π=1. Non-dimensional wavelength: λ/b, gain factor is the amplitude of motion of the floe/amplitude of forcing wave.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Heave, roll and sway RAOs for an ice floe with sill and with beam-to-draft ratio of 11=10. Non-dimensional wavelength: λ/b, gain factor is the amplitude of motion of the floe/amplitude of forcing wave.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Nomogram for calculating approximate ice thickness from effective freeboard. Shaded area indicates standard deviation between measured and predicted values (after Ackley and others 1976).