Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:31:29.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community structure and biodiversity of intertidal sandy beach polychaetes in Chabahar Bay, Oman Gulf, Iran, related to the monsoon period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Mehrshad Taheri*
Affiliation:
Iranian National Center for Oceanography, No. 9, Etemadzadeh Street, Fatemi Avenue, Tehran, Iran, PO Box 14155-4781
Maryam Yazdani Foshtomi
Affiliation:
Iranian National Center for Oceanography, No. 9, Etemadzadeh Street, Fatemi Avenue, Tehran, Iran, PO Box 14155-4781
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Taheri, Iranian National Center for Oceanography, No. 9 Etemadzadeh Street, Fatemi Avenue, Tehran, Iran, P.O. Box 14155-4781 email: mehrshadtaheri@yahoo.com

Abstract

Community structure and biodiversity of polychaetes of the intertidal sandy beach at Chabahar Bay, the largest bay in the north-east of Oman Gulf, were studied for ten months in 2007. A total of 16 polychaete species belonging to 15 families were identified. The results showed that densities were influenced by the monsoon season so that maximum density (1370 ind m−2) was observed at pre monsoon while minimum density (117 ind m−2) was obtained during monsoon. Two species, Synelmis albini and Magelona cornuta, were the most abundant species. The highest and lowest values of diversity and richness indices were obtained at pre monsoon and during monsoon, respectively. Also, multivariate analysis separated monsoon season from pre and post monsoon clearly. Our results show that the monsoon can be the most important factor on community structure and biodiversity of polychaetes at Chabahar Bay and the intertidal of this bay is not a favourable environment for polychaete development.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of sampling area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Mean environmental condition during present study.

Figure 2

Table 1.Results of two-way ANOVA (station, season, station × season) on all analyses.

Figure 3

Table 2.Frequency of occurrence (F%) and feeding guilds (FG) of polychaetes.

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Mean density per m2 of two dominant species at both stations during this study.

Figure 5

Fig. 4.Mean density recorded per m2 in each month during this study.

Figure 6

Table 3.Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between density of Polychaeta with environmental variables.

Figure 7

Fig. 5.Feeding guilds composition of samples through the study period.

Figure 8

Table 4.Species number (S), diversity (H′), richness (D), and evenness (J) during this study at Tiss.

Figure 9

Table 5.Species number (S), diversity (H′), richness (D), and evenness (J) during this study at Konarak.

Figure 10

Fig. 6.Similarity between stations and months of polychaete community. T, Tiss; K, Konarak.

Figure 11

Fig. 7.nMDS plot of polychaete communities. T, Tiss; K, Konarak.