Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:06:42.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emplacement mechanism of the Tafresh granitoids, central part of the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, Iran: evidence from magnetic fabrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Davoud Raeisi
Affiliation:
School of Geology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Hassan Mirnejad*
Affiliation:
School of Geology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
Maryam Sheibi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Hassan Mirnejad, Email: hmirnejad@ut.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Granitoid stocks crop out in the Ghahan and Sarbadan areas near Tafresh city, which is situated in the central part of the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, Iran. The stocks, consisting of porphyritic and sub-granular diorite and granular granodiorite, intruded into Eocene volcano-sedimentary units. Normalized multi-element diagrams indicate that the analysed rocks are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements and depleted in high field strength elements. These geochemical features are typical of subduction-related calc-alkaline arc magmas. The stocks belong to the ferromagnetic and I-type granitoid series. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility provides information about the internal fabric of the granitoids. Susceptibility values range from 5.6 × 10−3 to more than 71.6 × 10−3, averaging 27.9 × 10−3 SI. Relatively low anisotropy values (P%) rarely exceed 10 %. Shape parameters (T) vary between −0.48 and +0.74, averaging + 0.2. Each stock is interpreted to contain a distinct feeder zone in which magnetic lineation plunges steeply (> 60°), suggesting that the magma ascended mainly in a NW–SE conduit and, to a lesser extent, in an E–W direction. Integration of magnetic fabric data, field observations and tectonic setting indicates that the shear zone that was developed between the Indes and Talkhab faults had created an opening into which the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks were emplaced by way of creating a suitable tensional space for the ascent of magma.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Simplified geological map of Iran (Aghanabati, 2004) and (b) geological map of the Tafresh area (modified after Hajian, 1977). The star shows the position of the plutons in Iran on which AMS was carried out. 1 – Urumieh (Ghalamghash et al.2009); 2 – Tafresh (this study); 3 – Boroujerd and Gousheh (Rasouli et al.2012); 4 – Shir-Kuh (Sheibi et al.2012); 5 – Shah-Kuh (Esmaeily et al.2007); 6 – Zahedan (Sadeghian et al.2005).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Field relationships in the Tafresh granitoids. (a) Granodiorite with granular texture, Sarbadan stock. Hornblende (Hbl) and biotite (Bt) crystals are set in a matrix mainly composed of feldspar crystals. (b) Hand specimen of diorite, Ghahan. Hornblende (Hbl) in a matrix mainly composed of plagioclase crystals. (c) Fine-grained microdiorite enclaves in the diorite rock. Mineral abbreviations after Whitney & Evans (2010).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Tectonic map of the Tafresh area showing the main faults. 1:250000 geological maps of Iran (www.gsi.ir).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Petrographic characteristics of different rocks from the Tafresh granitoids. (a, b) Granular to sub-granular granodiorite with plagioclase (Pl), quartz (Qz), K-feldspar (Kfs), biotite (Bt) and hornblende (Hbl) minerals, Sarbadan stock. (c) Sub-granular diorite containing plagioclase, hornblende and opaque minerals (Opq), Ghahan stock. (d) Euhedral plagioclase with oscillatory zoning, Ghahan stock. Mineral abbreviations after Whitney & Evans (2010).

Figure 4

Table 1. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data for the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks

Figure 5

Table 2. Selected electron microprobe analyses of magnetites from the Tafresh granitoids

Figure 6

Table 3. Major (wt %), trace and rare earth element (ppm) data of representative rock samples from the Tafresh granitoids

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Chemical composition of magnetite on TiO2–Fe2O3–FeO ternary diagram (Buddington & Lindsley, 1964).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Chemical classification of rocks from the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks. (a) K2O + Na2O v. SiO2 plot (Middlemost, 1991); composition of studied samples ranges from diorite (Ghahan stock) to granodiorite (Sarbadan stock). (b) AFM (A = Na2O + K2O; F = FeOt; M = MgO) diagram with differentiation lines of Irvine & Barager (1971), showing a calc-alkaline affinity for the granitoids (Irvine & Baragar, 1971).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. (a) Classification of the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks on A/NK v. A/CNK diagram (ANK = molar Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) and ACNK = molar Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O)) (Shand, 1943). (b) Na2O v. K2O classification diagram for discrimination of I- and S-type granitoids (Chappell & White, 2001); all samples fall in the field of I-type granitoids. (c) FeOt/MgO v. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y diagram. (d) Tectonic classification diagram Rb v. Ta + Yb (Pearce et al.1984). WPG – within-plate granites; VAG – volcanic arc granites; syn-COLG – syn-collision granites; ORG – oceanic ridge granites.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Harker diagrams for major elements of the Tafresh granitoids.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. Normalized values from Sun & McDonough (1989). (b) Primitive mantle normalized multi-element diagram. Normalizing values are after McDonough & Sun (1995).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Location of sampling stations used for the magnetic fabric study in the Sarbadan (S) and Ghahan (G) stocks.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Contour map of magnetic susceptibility (Km) for the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. (a) Contour maps of anisotropy percentage (P%) and (b) shape parameter (T) for the Ghahan and Sarbadan stocks.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Magnetic parameter diagrams. (a) P% v. Km; (b) T v. Km; (c) T v. P%.

Figure 16

Fig. 14. (a) Magnetic lineation and (b) foliation maps of the Sarbadan and Ghahan stocks. Stereoplots represent the lineations (K1) and pole to foliation planes (K3).

Figure 17

Fig. 15. (a) Location and movement of the Indes and Talkhab faults in the Tafresh area, and (b) the idealized model for emplacement of the Tafresh granitoids.

Figure 18

Fig. 16. Magnetic parameter diagrams. (a) Frequency v. Km; (b) T v. Km; (c) T v. P%.

Figure 19

Table 4. A summary of the AMS results on intrusive rocks in Iran