Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:37:24.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bovine mtDNA D-loop haplotypes exceed mutations in number despite reduced recombination: an effective alternative for identity control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2010

E. Seroussi*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Animal Sciences, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel
E. Yakobson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Animal Sciences, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel

Abstract

Mitochondrial (mt) DNA D-loop heterogeneity, haplotype distribution and possible sub-population structures within the relevant populations are important for DNA-based traceability. To gain insight into this distribution, we compared 1515 Bos taurus mtDNA D-loop sequences available from GenBank to 219 sequences that we sequenced de novo. A pronounced ambiguous trace typical of C-track length heteroplasmy was encountered in 5% of the samples, which were excluded from the analysis. Previously undescribed mutations and haplotypes were observed in 6% and 63% of the sequences, respectively. B. taurus haplotypes divided into the taurus, indicus and grunniens types and 302 variable sites formed the 858 taurus haplotypes detected. Fifty-five sites displayed a complex level of variation. As each level represents an independent mutation event, a total of 399 mutations were traced, which could potentially explain independent formation of less than half (47%) of the haplotypes encountered: most haplotypes were derived from different combinations of these mutations. We suggest that a mutational hotspot may explain these results and discuss the usefulness of mtDNA for identity and maternity assurance.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 (Colour online) Variation in Bos taurus type D-loop mtDNA. (a) Delineation of the D-loop region corresponding to positions 15921-16338 and 1-355 (Anderson et al., 1982) with annotation of the functionally important domains following Steinborn et al., 1998, including the origin of replication (red), stem-loop forming regions (pink), sequence elements (green), conserved sequence boxes (brown), protein-binding domains (blue), transcriptional start sites of L-strand (LSP) and H-strand (HSP) promoters (light purple) and LSP-enhancing domain (grey). (b) Distribution of point mutations observed across the control region in alignment with the delineation in (a). The columns, which indicate the total number of occurrences in each site, correspond to the logarithmic scale while the distribution within each column of mutations detected in this study (red series) and previously reported (blue series) is linear. (c) Reverse (upper) and forward (lower) sequence chromatograms representing ambiguous trace derived from Holstein international AI sire McCloe-Pond Trent, USA, 17226843 (IL no. 5247). (d) Reverse sequence chromatograms of common (upper) and rare (lower) haplotypes. Arrows point to the two novel mutations that coincide in this sire sequence (GenBank accession no. FN557401).

Figure 1

Table 1 Eight novel mtDNA D-loop mutations