Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:14:59.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring immune selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2003

D. J. CONWAY
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
S. D. POLLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Immune responses that kill pathogens or reduce their reproductive rate are generally important in protecting hosts from infection and disease. Pathogens that escape the full impact of such responses will survive, and any heritable genetic basis of this evasion will be selected. Due to the memory component of vertebrate immune responses, pathogens with rare alleles of a target antigen can have an advantage over those with common alleles, leading to the maintenance of a polymorphism. At the genetic level, there ought to be detectable signatures of balancing selection in the genes encoding these antigens. Here, methods for identifying these selective signatures are reviewed. Their practical utility for identifying which antigens are targets of protective immune responses is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Examples of highly polymorphic single-locus antigen genes in major pathogens of humans or domestic animals

Figure 1

Table 2. Examples of multi-locus genes encoding variant antigens in major pathogens of humans or domestic animals

Figure 2

Fig. 1. A. Scheme of immune selection on a polymorphic pathogen surface antigen (3 different clones within a host). Allele-specific immune responses cause differential survival of the unrecognised genotype, and thus natural selection on heritable variation. B. Scheme of immune selection on transcriptionally-determined phenotypes of a variant pathogen surface antigen encoded by 3 variant genes (with 3 different phenotypes of one clone within a host). Variant-specific immune responses cause differential survival of the unrecognised phenotype, but this has an identical genotype to the other variants so there is no heritable change.

Figure 3

Table 3. Molecular population genetic studies testing for evidence of selection on P. falciparum polymorphic antigen genes

Figure 4

Table 4. Neutrality index and significance of the McDonald-Kreitman test for nucleotide polymorphism in P. falciparum antigen genes compared with divergence from their P. reichenowi homologues

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Scheme of two cases of positive diversifying selection within a species, with completely opposite causes. A. Balancing selection maintains allelic diversity within populations (for example due to frequency-dependent selection favouring rare types). B. Divergent selection in different populations leads to fixation of different alleles (adaptation of populations to different conditions). Note that broad sampling of genotypes from the species would yield similar diversity in each case. Structured sampling of different populations would be required to reveal the distribution of the alleles and the likely cause of selection.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Scheme of Plasmodium falciparum ama1 with two sliding window tests of neutrality, using a sample of 51 alleles randomly taken from one population in Nigeria. A. Block scheme showing the major domains of the protein (Domain I–III together comprise the merozoite surface-accessible ‘ectodomain’ of the mature protein). B. Sliding window plots Tajima's D index (positive values indicate balancing selection, negative would indicate directional selection). C. Sliding window of Fu & Li's D and F indices (positive values indicate balancing selection, negative would indicate directional selection). Horizontal lines at the top of panels B and C show the positions of Domains I–III.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. A. Scheme of the P. falciparum msp1 gene (blocks with solid shading have the most, diagonal shading intermediate, and no shading the least amino acid polymorphisms; Tanabe et al. 1987). Below are (i) 10 polymorphic sites studied in 6 population samples from Africa, (ii) 4 polymorphic sites studied in 2 populations in Southeast Asia (Conway et al. 2000a). B. Summary of FST indices (the proportion of overall allelic variation which differs among populations) for the 10 polymorphic sites (intragenic loci) among the 6 populations in Africa. C. Summary of FST indices for the 4 polymorphic sites among the 2 populations in Southeast Asia. Asterisks show where FST values were significantly >0. Arrows indicate the particular site in the gene (block 2, abbreviated to bk2) with the lowest FST index in both continental analyses (i.e. at which most of the overall diversity is also represented within each local population).

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Associations of anti-MSP1 block 2 antibodies with protection from clinical malaria in a longitudinal cohort study of Gambian children (data from Conway et al. 2000a). Reactivity of IgG in serum from 337 Gambian children in June (prior to the malaria transmission season) was tested for positivity by ELISA against a panel of 9 recombinant proteins representing block 2 sequences which fall into 3 major types (K1-like, MAD-like, and RO33-like; these have local allele frequencies in The Gambia of 0.51, 0.33 and 0.16, respectively). This positivity was tested for association with the subsequent experience of clinical malaria in these children from July–November (throughout the transmission season). A relative risk of <1 indicates where antibody reactivity is associated with a reduced risk of malaria (asterisks show where this is statistically significant).

Figure 9

Table 5. Pathogen genes studied by Phylogenetic Analysis using Maximum Likelihood (PAML) to look for evidence of positive selection