Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:01:19.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploration of adulteration in common raw spices using antenna-based sensor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2022

Nitika*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
Jaswinder Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
Rajesh Khanna
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India
*
Author for correspondence: Nitika, E-mail: nnitika_phd19@thapar.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of food products to store and dissipate electromagnetic energy is determined by the material's dielectric properties. In relation to this phenomenon, a non-destructive technique is presented for food evaluation based on the shift in resonant frequency and reflection coefficient magnitude value of the proposed slot-loaded microstrip line-fed antenna-based sensor caused by the change in dielectric properties of the food material. In this work, a miniaturized antenna sensor of 10 × 10 mm2 size comprised of a dielectric substrate FR-4 with permittivity (εr) = 4.4 having ground plane at the bottom and a radiating element at the top is designed to operate at 13.3 GHz. Three samples of spices, i.e. red chilli powder, black pepper powder, and turmeric powder, are considered for quality monitoring whose relationship in terms of reflection coefficient, resonant frequency, and dielectric permittivity at 13.17, 12.61, and 13.09 GHz respectively is analyzed. Further, second-order polynomial model is derived to predict dielectric permittivity of the material under test with high accuracy. The experimental procedure of this proposed sensor is based upon the interaction of the sample food materials with the electromagnetic field owing to shift in resonant frequency as a function of dielectric permittivity of the samples. The proposed antenna sensor has a Q-factor of 409, showing significantly high sensitivity of 280 MHz with 98% accuracy and standard deviation less than the difference between unadulterated and adulterated values, giving resolution high enough to distinguish adulteration with an acceptable statistical accuracy.

Information

Type
Microwave Measurements
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geometrical layout for different ground plane structures. (b) Reflection coefficient magnitude corresponding to different ground plane structures.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Geometrical layout for different radiating patch structures. (b) Reflection coefficient magnitude corresponding to different radiating patch structures.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Geometrical layout of slot-loaded proposed antenna sensor in CST Microwave Studio. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.

Figure 3

Table 1. Geometrical parameters of the proposed microstripline-fed antenna sensor

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Photograph of fabricated slot-loaded microstrip line-fed antenna sensor with three-hole SMA connector. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Simulated and measured response of reflection coefficient magnitude. (b) Reflection coefficient magnitude measurement using Agilent E5071C VNA.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. (a) Comparison graph for simulated and measured gain. (b) Comparison graph for simulated and measured efficiency. (c) Simulated current density on radiating patch. (d) Simulated current density on ground plane of the proposed antenna-based sensor.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) Measured reflection coefficient magnitude response for the proposed sensor loaded with all pure samples of red chilli, black pepper, and turmeric powder. (b, c) Experimental setup during measurement with samples loaded on the surface of the proposed antenna sensor.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Relationship between resonant frequency and dielectric permittivity.

Figure 9

Table 2. Measured values of sensitivity and dielectric permittivity for the proposed antenna-based sensor w.r.t. resonant frequency and reflection coefficient

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Relationship between frequency shift, resonant frequency, and measured dielectric permittivity of pure spice samples (red chilli, black pepper, and turmeric powder).

Figure 11

Table 3. LOD in different spice samples

Figure 12

Table 4. Experimental data of MUT

Figure 13

Fig. 10. (a) Measured reflection coefficient magnitude with respect to resonant frequency for pure red chilli powder adulterated with brick powder at different levels of adulteration. (b) Relationship between shift in frequency and resonant frequency (fr) at different levels of adulteration in pure red chilli powder. (c) Measured dielectric permittivity of the MUT corresponding to the amount of the adulterant in pure sample.

Figure 14

Table 5. Experimental data of MUT

Figure 15

Fig. 11. (a) Measured reflection coefficient magnitude with respect to resonant frequency for pure black pepper powder adulterated with papaya seeds powder at different levels of adulteration. (b) Relationship between shift in resonant frequency and resonant frequency (fr) at different levels of adulteration in pure black pepper powder. (c) Measured dielectric permittivity of the MUT corresponding to the amount of the adulterant in pure sample.

Figure 16

Fig. 12. (a) Measured reflection coefficient magnitude with respect to resonant frequency for pure turmeric powder adulterated with artificial yellow powder at different levels of adulteration. (b) Relationship between shift in frequency and resonant frequency (fr) at different levels of adulteration in pure turmeric powder. (c) Measured dielectric permittivity of the MUT corresponding to the amount of the adulterant in pure sample.

Figure 17

Table 6. Experimental data of MUT

Figure 18

Fig. 13. Variation in reflection coefficient magnitude at 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 g amount of adulterant for (a) red chilli powder adulterated with brick powder, (b) black pepper powder adulterated with papaya seeds powder, (c) turmeric powder adulterated with artificial yellow color.

Figure 19

Table 7. Reproducibility data for some common adulterants in spices

Figure 20

Table 8. A detailed comparison with earlier reported work in terms of the analytical performance