Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:04:11.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epitaxial entropy-stabilized oxides: growth of chemically diverse phases via kinetic bombardment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

George N. Kotsonis*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27606, USA Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Christina M. Rost
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA
David T. Harris
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Jon-Paul Maria
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27606, USA Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
*
Address all correspondence to George N. Kotsonis at gnk5@psu.edu

Abstract

This paper explores thin films of the entropy-stabilized oxide (ESO) composition MgxNixCoxCuxZnxScxO (x ~ 0.167) grown by laser ablation in incremental gas pressures and O2/Ar ratios to modulate particle kinetic energy and plume reactivity. Low pressures supporting high kinetic energy adatoms favor the kinetic stabilization of a single rocksalt phase, while high pressures (low kinetic energy adatoms) result in phase separation. The pressure threshold for phase separation is a function of O2/Ar ratio. These findings suggest large kinetic energies facilitate the assembly and quench of metastable ESO phases that may require immoderate physical or chemical conditions to synthesize using near-equilibrium techniques.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Phase structure of J30 films as a function of total deposition pressure and O2 gas fraction. Data points in the white phase field correspond to films exhibiting a single-phase rocksalt (RS) structure and points in the gray phase field correspond to films with both RS and Sc2O3 phases.

Figure 1

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction data for a subset of films on MgO: Bragg–Brentano scans of (a) films grown at constant O2 partial pressure and varying total pressure; (b) films grown at a constant total pressure of 200 mTorr and varying partial O2 pressure; and (c) reciprocal space map of J30 grown at 50 mTorr O2. In (a) and (b), the Cukα doublet can be resolved in single-phase films and reflections from stray CuKβ and WL radiation are indicated with arrows. A CuKα1 monochromator was used for (c).

Figure 2

Figure 3. AFM images of J30 grown on MgO in: (a) 50 mTorr O2; (b) 150 mTorr O2; (c) 200 mTorr O2; (d) 300 mTorr O2; and (e)–(h) respective line traces. Note the variable color scales in (a)–(d) and constant height scale for (e)–(h). Coordinates of line traces are denoted by dashed white lines in (a)–(d). The scale bar in (a) applies to (b)–(d).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Collective data set for J30 films grown on alumina: (a) offset XRD plots and corresponding AFM images for (b) 50 mTorr O2; (c) 50 mTorr O2 + 200 mTorr Ar; (d) 50 mTorr O2 post-annealing; and (e) bare Al2O3 substrate. Deposition atmospheres are labeled in (a). Data for a bare substrate is included in (a) and (e) for reference. Arrows in (d) denote scandium-rich grains. The scale bar in (e) applies to (b)–(d).

Supplementary material: PDF

Kotsonis et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S8

Download Kotsonis et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 947.7 KB