Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:39:56.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ice flow relations for stress and strain-rate components from combined shear and compression laboratory experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

William F. Budd
Affiliation:
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia E-mail: Roland.Warner@aad.gov.auInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Roland C. Warner
Affiliation:
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia E-mail: Roland.Warner@aad.gov.auDepartment of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
T.H. Jacka
Affiliation:
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia E-mail: Roland.Warner@aad.gov.auDepartment of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
Jun Li
Affiliation:
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, AustraliaSGT Inc., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Adam Treverrow
Affiliation:
Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia E-mail: Roland.Warner@aad.gov.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The generalized (Glen) flow relation for ice, involving the second invariants of the stress deviator and strain-rate tensors, is only expected to hold for isotropic polycrystalline ice. Previous single-stress experiments have shown that for the steady-state flow, which develops at large strains, the tertiary strain rate is greater than the minimum (secondary creep) value by an enhancement factor which is larger for shear than compression. Previous experiments combining shear with compression normal to the shear plane have shown that enhancement of the tertiary octahedral strain rate increases monotonically from compression alone to shear alone. Additional experiments and analyses presented here were conducted to further investigate how the separate tertiary shear and compression strain-rate components are related in combined stress situations. It is found that tertiary compression rates are more strongly influenced by the addition of shear than is given by a Glen-type flow relation, whereas shear is less influenced by additional compression. A scalar function formulation of the flow relation is proposed, which fits the tertiary creep data well and is readily adapted to a generalized form that can be extended to other stress configurations and applied in ice mass modelling.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2013
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Diagrammatic representation of the ice creep test configuration for long rectangular prism ice samples in horizontal shear combined with vertical compression, confined in the direction of flow but free to extend in the transverse direction. The solid and dotted lines in the profile view show the respective initial and final shapes of the initially rectangular deformation samples. The dashed lines indicate the initial profile of the ‘back cut’ parallelepiped samples.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Minimum strain rates from deformation tests for shear alone ( crosses), and uncomfined compression alone ( open squares) as functions of the individual stress, and the corresponding octahedral ( versus τo) relation (open circles), confirming a Glen-type creep power law with exponent n = 3. All tests were performed at −2°C. The sloping lines have all been drawn with n = 3, to show more clearly the ratios expected for Ks (dotted line), kc (dashed line) and Ko (solid line) in Eqns (20), from the logarithmic spacings of the parallel lines.

Figure 2

Table 1.Results of combined shear and compression ice deformation experiments. Sample dimensions: length, L, width, W, height, H, and, for cylindrical sample, diameter, D. Stresses: compressive stress, σ, shear stress, τ, octahedral stress, τo. Combined stress shear variable: rs (Eqn (37)). Minimum strain rates: compressive, , shear, , octahedral, ; tertiary strain rates: compressive, , shear, , octahedral, ; final octahedral strain, εo, final, Samples were initially isotropic, and temperature for all tests was −2°C. The blanks in the table correspond to the zero-stress components in the compression-alone and shear-alone tests, or indicate where data were not available

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Crystal orientation fabrics for horizontal (x-y) sections, with x in the shear direction as shown in Figure 1. The units of the applied compression, σ, and shear, τ, are MPa. The total accumulated octahedral strain, εo, is given below for each sample. (a) Randomly oriented laboratory-made ice (εo = 0%). (b) Two-maximum fabric generated by confined compression alone (εo = 15%). (c) Girdle fabric generated by unconfined compression alone (εo = 22%). (d) Single-maximum fabric generated by shear alone (εo = 101 %). (e) Fabric generated by large shear and smaller confined compression deviator (test 24, εo = 28%). (f) Fabric generated by comparable shear and confined compression deviator (test 22, εo= 43%). All experiments were conducted at −2°C. All crystal orientation fabric diagrams are lower-hemisphere Schmidt equal-area plots, with (a–d) from previously published tests.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Time series of strain rates for individual shear and compression components, and corresponding octahedral values. All experiments were conducted at −2°C. The rms fractional deviation, v, of the cubic spline curve from the experimental strain-rate values (Eqn (32)) is given for each fit to component and octahedral values: (a) high shear stress (τ = 0.48 MPa), low compression (σ = 0.16 MPa) (test 2); (b) comparable shear and compression deviator (τ = 0.49 MPa, σ = 0.98 MPa) (test 22); (c) high-compression deviator, low shear stress (σ = 0.98 MPa, τ = 0.245 MPa) (test 18).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Progress of individual component and octahedral strain rates as a function of the corresponding component strains for the experiments shown in Figure 4. All experiments were conducted at −2°C. The rms fractional deviation, v, of the cubic spline curve from the experimental strain-rate values is given for each fit to component and octahedral values.

Figure 6

Fig. 6.The influence of incrersing each component stress on the other components strain rate. (a) T he influence of increasing normal compression stress on the shear strain rate. Shear strain-rate curves, ( versus octahedral strain, εo) are shown for a fixed shear stress (τ = 0.49 MPa) and rainree values of the confined normal stress (σ = 0,0.98, 1.96 MPa) (tests 1, 22 and 16 respectively). (b) The influence of increasing horizontal shear stress on the vertical compressive strain rate. Compressive strain-rate curves, ( versus octahedral strain, εo) are shown for a fixed confined normal stress (σ = 0.49 MPa) for three values of the shear stress (τ = 0.061, 0.245, 0.420 MPa) (tests 14, 15 and 4 respectively). The increases in the component tertiary strain rates expected for the combined stress experiments, assuming a Glen-type flow relation, are indicated by the vertical arrows near the right margins.

Figure 7

Fig. 7.The influence of increasing compression on the shear rate, and of increasing shear on the compression rate, for steady-state tertiary flow. The normalized ratios of component strain rates to the cube of the component stress deviators i.e. for shear and for compression, are shown as a function of the relative increase in the other component stress, through for shear strain rate and for compression. Also shown are the curves for the Glen-type flow relation from Eqns (34) and (35) (solid curve) and curves for the regression models: shear component from Eqn (41) (lighter dashed curve), and for compression from Eqn (42) (lighter dot-dashed curve). The corresponding predictions of the scalar function flow relation from Eqns (54) and (55) (for ES = 4.5EC) are shown as the corresponding bolder curves.

Figure 8

Fig. 8.(a) Dependence of the (normalized) ratio of tertiary octahedral strain rate, and the cube of the octahedral stress, (i.e. the effective tertiary flow parameter) on the relative proportions of the shear and compression deviatoric stresses, as described by the variable rs. From Eqn (56), the ratio is normalized to at τ =0 (rs = 0). The dashed curve shows the relationship corresponding to Eqn (47) for Es = 4.5Ec. The solid curve shows the corresponding relation for the scalar formulation from Eqns (56) and (57), i.e. [Esτ2+ EcS2] / [Ec(τ2 +S2)] which fits the experimental data well. (b) Dependence of the quantity on the stress configuration parameter rs, where is calculated from Eqns (54) and (55) for the shear and compression components respectively, and Eqn (56) for the octahedral strain rate. These values are normalized by for rs = 0. As in (a), the solid curve is given by [Esτ2 + EcS2]/[Ec(τ2 + S2)]. The important result from the scalar formulation here is that the individual strain-rate components for shear and compression follow the same relation as τo (Eqns (54) and (55)), as would all tensor components. One outlier (test 17) lies off-scale.

Figure 9

Table 2.Statistics of ice crystal orientation fabrics (angles in degrees) for fabrics a–f shown in Figure 3. The c-axis angles are measured relative to the x, y, z, axes with z vertical, x along the shear direction and y transverse, as shown in Figure 1. φ is the angle between the c-axis and the vertical (co-latitude).χ is the angle between the vertical and the projection of the c-axis in the (y, z) plane. ψ is the angle between the vertical and the projection of the c-axis in the (x, z) plane. χ = tan−1(tan φ sin θ); ψ = tan−1(tan φ cos θ), where θ is the angle between the projection of the c-axis in the (x, y) plane and the x-axis (i.e. the c-axis longitude, measured from the shear direction). is the mean colatitude and its standard deviation, φ1/2 is the median angle from the vertical (enclosing 50% of the total number of c-axes) and φ1/4 is the first quartile angle from the vertical (enclosing 25% of the total axes)