Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:45:53.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probing halloysite nanotube (HNT) sorption sites using surface engineered gold or silver nanoparticles – effects of halloysite morphology and binding groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2026

Nia Gray-Wannell*
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute , Aberdeen, UK
Christopher P. Kershaw
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University , UK
Zabeada Aslam
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds , UK
James McGettrick
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University , UK
Stephen Hillier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute , Aberdeen, UK Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Chris Greenwell
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University , UK
Rik Brydson
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds , UK
Peter J. Holliman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University , UK
*
Corresponding author: Nia Gray-Wannell; Email: nia.gray-wannell@hutton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) can be used as stable support materials for gold and silver nanoparticles (Au/Ag-NPs) without distinction given to the morphology of the tubular HNTs, i.e. polygonal prismatic or cylindrical. The present study aimed to use direct visualization techniques to observe and compare the adsorption sites and behaviors of the two tubular morphologies with both Au- and Ag-NPs. Au/Ag-NPs were surface engineered with methyl-, carboxylate-, or phosphonate-terminated linker groups and reacted with halloysite nanotubes with two different morphologies, forming composite materials HNTs@Au-NPs and HNTs@Ag-NPs. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to investigate the sorption reactions. Au-NPs disperse well into individual particles while the Ag-NPs show a tendency to agglomerate, making them less suitable probes for adsorption onto HNTs. The results also indicate that polygonal prismatic HNTs show greater sorption than cylindrical HNTs, where NPs were detected on the external walls of the nanotubes. This sorption is suggested to occur at the steps and edges of the particles, at the termini of the tubes, and in the hollow inner lumina. For the varying linker groups, carboxylate- and phosphonate-derivatized Au-NPs show similar sorption behavior on HNTs, while no surface sorption was observed for the methyl-terminated linkers. This justifies the hypothesis that the carboxylate and phosphonate moieties chemisorb to the hydroxyls of the aluminol groups at the edge sites, steps, and lumina of polygonal prismatic HNTs, identifying these as key anion bonding sites on HNTs, while non-ionic, methyl-terminated Au-NPs do not adsorb. Identification of these specific anionic bonding sites on two different HNT morphologies highlights the importance of HNT morphology in their use as stable support materials in applications such as catalysis, anion sorption, and drug delivery, amongst others.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Reaction scheme showing derivatized Au-NPs chemisorbing to halloysite surface hydroxyl groups (R = halloysite).

Figure 1

Table 1. XPS data (elements shown as at.% and normalized to the removal of carbon)Table 1. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. FTIR spectra showing the out-of-phase stretching Al–OH bands present in the polygonal prismatic HNTs in the discrete hydroxyl region from 3400 to 3800 cm–1 of: (a) polygonal prismatic HNTs@Au-NPs with a phosphonic acid terminated linker; (b) polygonal prismatic HNTs after reaction with Au-NPs and a methyl terminated linker; and (c) original polygonal prismatic HNT material.Figure 2. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 3. SAED images for: (a) cylindrical HNT; (b) cylindrical HNTs@Au-NPs; (c) prismatic HNT; and (d) prismatic HNTs@Au-NPs.Figure 3. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 4. TEM images of the cylindrical and polygonal prismatic halloysite nanotubes in their untreated form and after treatment with Au-NPs and a phosphonic acid terminated linker: (a) cylindrical HNT before treatment; (b–d) cylindrical HNTs@Au-NPs; (e) polygonal HNT before treatment; (f–h) polygonal HNTs@Au-NPs.Figure 4. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 5. FTIR spectra of polygonal prismatic halloysite with and without Au/Ag-NPs: (a) original material; (b) HNTs@Ag-NPs with a carboxylate terminated linker; (c) HNTs@Ag-NPs with a phosphonic acid terminated linker; (d) HNTs@Au-NPs with a carboxylate terminated linker; and (e) HNTs@Au-NPs with a phosphonic acid-terminated linker.Figure 5. long description.

Figure 6

Figure 6. TEM images of polygonal HNT: (a,b) HNTs@Au-NPs and a phosphonic acid-terminated linker; (c,d) HNTs@Au-NPs and a carboxylate-terminated linker; (e) HNTs@Ag-NPs and a phosphonic acid-terminated linker; and (f) HNTs@Ag-NPs and a carboxylate-terminated linker.Figure 6. long description.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Graphical depiction of the distinction between: (a) cylindrical and (b) polygonal prismatic HNTs@Au-NPs sorption with phosphonic acid linkers, with the crystalline structure of each HNT layer indicated.Figure 7. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Gray-Wannell et al. supplementary material

Gray-Wannell et al. supplementary material
Download Gray-Wannell et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5 MB