Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T17:17:08.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tectonic evolution of the South Altyn, NW China: constraints by geochemical, zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopic analysis of the Palaeozoic granitic plutons in the Mangya area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

Nan Xu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Cai-lai Wu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Yuan-Hong Gao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Min Lei
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Kun Zheng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Dong Gao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of MLR, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
*
Author for correspondence: Nan Xu, Email: wucailai@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The South Altyn Orogenic Belt (SAOB) is one of the most important orogenic belts in NW China, consisting of the South Altyn Continental Block and the Apa–Mangya Ophiolitic Mélange Belt. However, its Palaeozoic tectonic evolution is still controversial. Here, we present petrological, geochemical, zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopic data for the Mangya plutons with the aim of establishing the Palaeozoic tectonic evolution. We divide the Early Palaeozoic magmatism in the Apa–Mangya Ophiolitic Mélange Belt into four episodes and propose a plate tectonic model for the formation of these rocks. During 511–494 Ma, the South Altyn Ocean (SAO) was in a spreading stage, and some shoshonite series, I-type granitic rocks were generated. From 484 to 458 Ma, the oceanic crust of the SAO subducted northward, accompanied by large-scale magmatic events resulting in the generation of vast high-K calc-alkaline series, I-type granitic rocks. During 450–433 Ma, the SAO closed, and break-off of the subducted oceanic slab occurred, with the generation of some high-K calc-alkaline series, I–S transitional type granites. The SAOB was in post-orogenic extensional environment from 419 to 404 Ma, and many A-type granites were generated.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Map of China showing location of study area. (b) Distribution of granitic rocks in the Altyn Orogenic Belt. (c) Geological map of the Mangya area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a, c–f) Field pictures showing the characteristics of the outcrops. (b) Hand specimen showing the texture of the diorite. (a2–f2) Photomicrographs of the samples showing the mineral associations. Bt – biotite; Hbl – hornblende; Kfs – K-feldspar; Pl – plagioclase. Q – quartz.

Figure 2

Table 1. Major and trace elements concentrations and ratios of the samples in this study

Figure 3

Table 2. Zircon Lu–Hf isotopic data of Mangya plutons

Figure 4

Table 3. Geological features of the plutons from Mangya in this study

Figure 5

Fig. 3. CL images and U–Pb ages of the plutons in the Mangya area. Red circles – analysed spots of LA-ICP-MS analysis; green circles – analysed spots of Lu–Hf analysis.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. U–Pb concordia diagram for the zircon grains of the plutons in the Mangya area.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. U–Pb concordia diagram for the zircon grains of the plutons in the Mangya area.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. (a) SiO2–(Na2O + K2O) diagram for the plutons in the Mangya area (after Middlemost, 1994; Irvine & Baragar, 1971). (b) A/CNK–A/NK diagram (Rickwood, 1989); (c) SiO2–Fe* diagram (Frost & Frost, 2008); (d) K2O–SiO2 diagram (Maniar & Piccoli, 1989). Fe* = FeOT/(FeOT + MgO).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Harker diagrams.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Primitive-mantle-normalized trace-element spider diagrams (a, c, e, g) (normalizing values from Sun & McDonough, 1989) and chondrite–normalized REE distribution patterns (b, d, f, h) (normalizing values from Taylor & McLennan, 1985) of the plutons in the Mangya area.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Zircon ϵHf(t) values vs age (Ma) for the plutons in the Mangya area.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. (a, b) Plots of granite genetic types (after Whalen et al.1987). (c) Plot of Sr/Y vs Y (after Drummond & Defant, 1990). (d) Plot of (La/Yb)N–YbN (Defant & Drummond, 1990).

Figure 13

Fig. 11. (a) Plot of Al2O3/(MgO + FeOT) vs CaO/(MgO + FeOT) (Altherr et al.2000). (b) Plot of Ta/Yb vs Th/Yb (Gorton & Schandl, 2000). (c) Plot of Rb vs (Y + Nb) (Pearce et al.1984). (d) Plot of R1 vs R2 (Batchelor & Bowden, 1985). R1 = 4 * Si − 11 * (Na + K) − 2 * (Fe + Ti); R2 = 6 * Ca + 2 * Mg + Al; Si, Na, K, Fe, Ti, Ca, Mg and Al represent their atomic percentage contents.

Figure 14

Fig. 12 Schematic model of the plate tectonic evolution and magmatism in the AMOB, looking west at the time of granites emplacement.

Supplementary material: File

Xu et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Xu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 422.9 KB