Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:52:03.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CPW-fed circular-shaped fractal antenna with three iterations for UWB applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2015

Sarthak Singhal*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India. Phone: +917376157421
Ankit Pandey
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India. Phone: +917376157421
Amit Kumar Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India. Phone: +917376157421
*
Corresponding author: S. Singhal Email: ssinghal.rs.ece@iitbhu.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed circular-shaped fractal antenna with third iterative orthogonal elliptical slot for ultra-wideband applications is presented. The bandwidth is enhanced by using successive iterations of radiating patch, CPW feedline, and tapered ground plane. An impedance bandwidth of 2.9–20.6 GHz is achieved. The designed antenna has omnidirectional radiation patterns along with average peak realized gain of 3.5 dB over the entire frequency range of operation. A good agreement is observed between the simulated and experimental results. This antenna structure has the advantages of miniaturized size and wide bandwidth in comparison to previously reported fractal structures.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the designed antenna.

Figure 1

Table 1. Optimized dimensions of the parameters.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Four iterations of the antenna structure: (a) zeroth iteration; (b) first iteration; (c) second iteration; and (d) third iteration.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Variation of reflection coefficient characteristics for different values of Wf2.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Variation of reflection coefficient characteristics for different values of t.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Reflection coefficient versus frequency characteristics for four iterations of the designed antenna.

Figure 6

Table 2. Comparison of the four iterations of the designed antenna.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Prototype of the designed antenna structure.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Comparison of simulated and experimental reflection coefficient characteristics of the designed antenna structure.

Figure 9

Table 3. Comparison of the simulated and measured results of the designed antenna.

Figure 10

Table 4. Comparison of the designed antenna with other antennae in terms of dimensions and bandwidth.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Variation of real and imaginary parts of input impedance of the designed antenna structure.

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Surface current density distribution of the designed structure. (a) 4.7 GHz, (b) 7.6 GHz, (c) 10.9 GHz, and (d) 15.6 GHz.

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Radiation pattern measurement setup arrangement for the designed antenna.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Radiation patterns of the designed antenna in E- and H-planes at resonance frequencies: (a) 4.7 GHz, (b) 7.6 GHz, (c) 10.9 GHz, and (d) 15.7 GHz.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Variation of peak realized gain with frequency for the designed antenna structure.

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Simulated variation of radiation and total efficiencies with frequency.

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Time-domain analysis configurations: (a) face-to-face arrangement and (b) side-by-side arrangement.

Figure 18

Fig. 15. Simulated normalized amplitudes of the transmitted and received pulses during the time-domain analysis of the circular-shaped fractal antenna.

Figure 19

Table 5. Fidelity factor (in %) for face-to-face and side-by-side configurations.

Figure 20

Fig. 16. Variation of group delay with frequency for face-to-face and side-by-side configurations.

Figure 21

Fig. 17. Variation of transmission coefficient magnitude with frequency for face-to-face and side-by-side configurations.

Figure 22

Fig. 18. Variation of phase of S21 with frequency for face-to-face and side-by-side configurations.