To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Corporate governance involves the rules and practices that direct and control the decision-making of a corporation. The allocation of discretionary decision rights to individuals in organisations directly connects corporate governance with the principles of contributive justice. In this chapter, we start from Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice to provide a perspective on organisational justice and explore the process towards achieving contributive justice as far as determined by the patterns of corporate governance of the organisation. Specifically, we argue that just corporate decision-making needs to build on the contribution of stakeholders to the corporation. This argument is captured by a conceptualisation of justice in terms of contributive justice (see Chapter 3). The emphasis on contributive justice within corporate governance is further developed in a generalised stewardship theory as a model of governance that orients stakeholders towards advancing the collective benefit. The generalised stewardship approach to corporate governance particularly emphasises the contributive aspect of organisational participation, emphasising not only transparency and ex post accountability on the distribution of resources and outcomes but also ‘process accountability’, equity, and integrity.
This chapter advocates using contributive justice as a form of social justice in work situations as a necessary complement to distributive justice. In addition, it is argued that contributive justice fits better with the capability approach (CA) than distributive justice does. Finally, it is argued that most people are prone to prosocial behaviour under the right circumstances. Sen’s concept of freedom (central to the CA) is very compatible with contributive justice. Kulkarni’s definition of social justice as ‘equal freedom of capabilities’ is adapted to ‘equal freedom of capabilities in contribution’. Contributive justice, in combination with the CA, might provide more opportunities for an inclusive and diversified (work) environment. Additionally, contributive justice is apt to identify and cope with people with malicious intentions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.